Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Wherever you see anarchism they have lots of children and the culture expanding

W

WizardofSoda

Overlord
★★★★★
Joined
Aug 25, 2019
Posts
7,593
If you look at tyrannical societies, they always have falling birthrates, and eventually declining population and are having to import people just to prop up their systems. Whereas when you see anarchism, the people are having like 4 children each. So we are importing Afghans, Somalis, Ethiopians, Pakis and not the other way around. We can have all the army we want, they are still taking over here by numbers. And our armies did try to take control of them and implement our system in their countries, but we weren't able to make it last. Russia is being taken over year by year by the 'Stans through immigration.

The most totalitarian societies like in East Asia or Europe they have so few children that their countries populations will collapse unless they have an improbable turnaround in their birthrates. Yet in national anarchism those countries are not even remotely worried about falling population - they have fast growing populations.

Take Iraq that was hit by brutal warfare and massive ethnic division. They still have a fertility rate of 3.50. Whereas in Iran which has been peaceful and orderly since the end of the Iran-Iraq war, their fertility rate is 1.60, and in Turkey which is also orderly their fertility rate is 1.66.
 
Humans are naturally discontent with civilization.
 
Birthrates are very dependent on the economic state of a society yes. This could be solved in authoritarian regimes with a positive population control where women have the duty of having 2-3 kids before their 30s so that the population doesn't go down.
 
Humans are naturally discontent with civilization.

It reminds me of how most people want to go to the cities, but people are unhappy in the cities. And the same thing with birthrates, the cities always have low birthrates. Meanwhile people are happy in the rural areas, with good birthrates, but ironically want to leave for the cities.
 
you don't know what anarchism means

anarchism isn't chaos. Joker wasn't an anarchist.
 
Birthrates are very dependent on the economic state of a society yes. This could be solved in authoritarian regimes with a positive population control where women have the duty of having 2-3 kids before their 30s so that the population doesn't go down.

Strange thing is authoritarian societies don't seem to promote the birthrate.
 
you don't know what anarchism means

anarchism isn't chaos. Joker wasn't an anarchist.

These societies aren't really chaotic. Take in Afghanistan every day 40 million Afghans have to get food and water at a minimum. When I see videos of the country there is buildings, cars, motorbikes, everybody has clothing, even cell phones. All these things take a supply system and somebody operating the systems. Like somebody is transporting in the fuel for all those vehicles.
 

Similar threads

SnakeCel
Replies
7
Views
165
ReconElement
ReconElement
Lonelyus
Replies
13
Views
650
StephenK
StephenK
Seahorsecel
Replies
5
Views
194
NorthernWind
NorthernWind

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top