W
WizardofSoda
Overlord
★★★★★
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2019
- Posts
- 7,593
If you look at tyrannical societies, they always have falling birthrates, and eventually declining population and are having to import people just to prop up their systems. Whereas when you see anarchism, the people are having like 4 children each. So we are importing Afghans, Somalis, Ethiopians, Pakis and not the other way around. We can have all the army we want, they are still taking over here by numbers. And our armies did try to take control of them and implement our system in their countries, but we weren't able to make it last. Russia is being taken over year by year by the 'Stans through immigration.
The most totalitarian societies like in East Asia or Europe they have so few children that their countries populations will collapse unless they have an improbable turnaround in their birthrates. Yet in national anarchism those countries are not even remotely worried about falling population - they have fast growing populations.
Take Iraq that was hit by brutal warfare and massive ethnic division. They still have a fertility rate of 3.50. Whereas in Iran which has been peaceful and orderly since the end of the Iran-Iraq war, their fertility rate is 1.60, and in Turkey which is also orderly their fertility rate is 1.66.
The most totalitarian societies like in East Asia or Europe they have so few children that their countries populations will collapse unless they have an improbable turnaround in their birthrates. Yet in national anarchism those countries are not even remotely worried about falling population - they have fast growing populations.
Take Iraq that was hit by brutal warfare and massive ethnic division. They still have a fertility rate of 3.50. Whereas in Iran which has been peaceful and orderly since the end of the Iran-Iraq war, their fertility rate is 1.60, and in Turkey which is also orderly their fertility rate is 1.66.