It's Over When you verbally lash out at people that mock you they act hurt but then act the same the next time they see you

[Dregster]

.co users have done this shit to me many times on this forum and discord. I won't name names.

PM me names

 

[your personality]

Yeah, you're right about Mexicans being aggressive, though.
How many times they threw racist slurs of "chino" and "chinito" at me even in the streets.
But Napoleon complex is a fiction made to demean manlets.

Yeah I know the Napoleon complex is meant to demonize manlets but there are some manlets that like any other group that is stereotyped, act in the same way that the stereotype suggests they act.

And it's important to have faith in male friendship, as they are trying to destroy that also by making it seem gay like female "friendships."

Both Napoleon complex and the devaluation of male friendship is something (((they))) want to be accepted as truth and we can't let it.

Imo the thing to keep in mind though is that just like all kinds of associations even friendships are not unconditional and can still very easily fray.
It's my belief that males work best in loose associations not really close knits groups where betrayal and distancing over time can lead to feelings of despair and loss of hope.

 

[TheMostAncientcel]

The normies way of joking/teasing is very different when it is between themselves and not towards a subhuman.

1)It is done between males of more or less similar social status level.

2)It is very straightforward and not subtle.Sometimes even hyperbolic.

3)It is between people who actually hang out together or at least have a certain degree of confidence.Never towards strangers or semistrangers.

4)It is part of a greater tapestry of interactions not limited to the teasing but even to sharing a beer between men at the end of the day.

5)They laugh if the normie friend answers in a very insulting way and then the insulter laughs too while if it is the subhumans trying to answer with an insult it creates awkard silences and the usual "easy man..."

6)It happens even between 2 normies when alone while the subhuman is always teased in front of a pubblic (better if women are present)

 

[epillepsy]

Imo the thing to keep in mind though is that just like all kinds of associations even friendships are not unconditional and can still very easily fray.
It's my belief that males work best in loose associations not really close knits groups where betrayal and distancing over time can lead to feelings of despair and loss of hope.

This loose association is the natural way males work with each other, but close associations form within individual members within that group and make betrayal LESS likely, not more.
Of course most friendships sputter out but they don't want you to have strong solidarity with other males because that will disrupt gynocracy.
That's what the gay propaganda of demonizing male friendships as homosexuality is all about.

 

[your personality]

The normies way of joking/teasing is very different when it is between themselves and not towards a subhuman.

1)It is done between males of more or less similar social status level.

2)It is very straightforward and not subtle.Sometimes even hyperbolic.

3)It is between people who actually hang out together or at least have a certain degree of confidence.Never towards strangers or semistrangers.

4)It is part of a greater tapestry of interactions not limited to the teasing but even to sharing a beer between men at the end of the day.

5)They laugh if the normie friend answers in a very insulting way and then the insulter laughs too while if it is the subhumans trying to answer with an insult it creates awkard silences and the usual "easy man..."

Very much agree.
Or the sarcastic egging on to the designated subhuman male and encouraging him to make more of a scene to embarrass himself.

6)It happens even between 2 normies when alone while the subhuman is always teased in front of a pubblic (better if women are present)

Yup that's been my observation too.

This loose association is the natural way males work with each other, but close associations form within individual members within that group and make betrayal LESS likely, not more.

It's just the fallout that comes from those close association drifting apart that can have a very long lasting negative impact on morale of group.
It's like the betrayal that comes from someone promising you something and not delivering versus there being no betrayal or hard feelings if no one ever promised you to do something and they were late in delivering what they had talked about.

Of course most friendships sputter out but they don't want you to have strong solidarity with other males because that will disrupt gynocracy.
That's what the gay propaganda of demonizing male friendships as homosexuality is all about.

Yeah but that's been going on for a while now.
But for bullied males that are too broken and have a form of PTSD and feelings like it is just a matter of time before they are betrayed imo it's better they maintain loose associations with others at best.

 

[epillepsy]

It's just the fallout that comes from those close association drifting apart that can have a very long lasting negative impact on morale of group.
It's like the betrayal that comes from someone promising you something and not delivering versus there being no betrayal or hard feelings if no one ever promised you to do something and they were late in delivering what they had talked about.

Yeah, that is a risk. Doesn't mean you don't form close bonds just for that reason.
The betrayal doesn't happen 100%.

Yeah but that's been going on for a while now.
But for bullied males that are too broken and have a form of PTSD and feelings like it is just a matter of time before they are betrayed imo it's better they maintain loose associations with others at best.

Okay I get that but that is an unusual case.

 

[your personality]

Yeah, that is a risk. Doesn't mean you don't form close bonds just for that reason.
The betrayal doesn't happen 100%.

Imo it's a risk versus reward scenario.
On one hand you don't risk anything and never have the reward of fulfilling friendships.
On the other hand you can risk too much investment into fulfilling friendships only to have some of them fizzle out or the people distance themselves from you over time leaving you feeling just as alone and unwanted as before.

Okay I get that but that is an unusual case.

I think it's more common especially with many incels since a lot of people here have told of their stories of getting bullied and how it permanently scarred and stunted them.

 

[Simulacrasimulation]

This seems like an Incel trait of sorts tbh

You are the kid that is singled out, bullied and mocked in passive aggressive ways. You tell the people harassing you and singling you out many times to leave you alone. Some pretend to agree they'll back off and smirk while others don't listen and keep insisting that you are "being too sensitive".

Then when you've finally had enough and verbally lash out and insult them to get them to stop harassing you the people that harassed you act hurt emotionally and look a bit scared.

But that's where anything similar about a guy standing up to bullies ends. The next time they see you they remain very passive aggressive, smirking at you. You are known even more as the weird kid and still singled out. Many people now like to make you "flip out" for laughs and bait you into reacting. Others even point it out to you that it's so easy to get to you.

Imo it's a sign that they don't take you seriously and they were just waiting to break your composed facade that they think is fake and entitled (like you aren't supposed to be at peace with yourself or constantly doubting yourself) and wouldn't stop harassing you until they did. They want to see you lash out helplessly in frustration and pretend to act shocked but the next day go back to acting the way they were and show it didn't affect them at all.

And people label people like us dysfunctional. How can you harass someone to that extent, act shocked when they verbally lash out but then continue mocking and being passive aggressive and sending the message that no matter what you see yourself as above someone and that the person you are bothering is just the designated easy target for laughs? It takes a psychopath to do that yet that's how so many normies behave.
Incel "critics" are full of shit when they talk about how incels are socially dysfunctional when normies are way more dysfunctional and weird and passive aggressive.

yes this is built into the norman mindset

they go straight to the wahmen victim complex when they get backed up by an incel or someone lower SMV than themselves due to their narcissism

what they cant handle though is when you or an incel KEEPS ON BACKING THEM UP ON A DAILY BASIS basically you start mocking them first you completely flip the table and once you know the group or individuals who are mocking you, you make the first move to actively lampoon and passive aggressively shit on them, then ignore them in the same manner they have done to you, but even more aggressively, they have absolutely nothing for this, they completely chimp out.

 

[dirtykombatcel]

IDK seems like an odd scenario tbh. Typically if you insult the bullies back, there's going to be a fight. I don't think they'd act hurt.

Or maybe you're talking in the online sense, which is actually true. foids and soys insult incels all day, but we make a meme roasting them back and suddenty we're harrassing them.

Classic social manipulation. It happens in order to win the confrontation not only in the primitive sense, but also in a moral sense.

Not only they are degrading someone and making them feel like shit, they also get the moral compensation of acting hurt so that they are ALSO the victims.

Being both the VICTIM and the ATTACKER, you win both sides, the moral standpoint and the primitive standpoint.