Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

RageFuel When have you ever seen dating roaches plead guilty for scamming?

  • Thread starter femcelbreedingnig
  • Start date
femcelbreedingnig

femcelbreedingnig

Repugnant, Abrasive, Abhorrent
★★
Joined
Jan 1, 2025
Posts
4,692
Online time
1h 38m
I have never heard of a case of a manosphere influencer peddling dating advice being charged with false advertising.

This is why for decades people would sell the most slimmest of snake oil in the most sleaziest of ways to try and profit off of male sexual frustration.

You have literal PUAs nowadays leaning heavily into looksmaxxing and blackpill content, just to play a promo in the middle of their videos, talking about some “join my private community if you want to learn how to communicate effectively and exploit raw primal attraction triggers to get any girl you want.”
Obviously you can’t get ANY girl you want. Nobody can get everything they want. Our wants are unlimited. But you have these bluepilled leaders who probably do believe in these scams, so they won’t attack these grifters JFL:feelskek::fuk:.
Worse is when grifters promise their bootcamps or programs will help you sleep with 10s of 100s of femholes. Mixed in with messaging about sleeping with “hot girls.” But you can’t do anything about that because “muh beauty/hotness is subjective” bullshit and you can also technically sleep with tons of junky homeless landwhales or quasi night-walkers if you lead with your wallet.

No accountability on false dating advertisements has created the environment filled to the brim with bad actors with millions of views and followings—where effectively anyone can monetize dating advice! It’s literally a free money glitch for the soulless!

I bet you if you look through PUAhate archives, you can find a thread about this.

Speaking of, I have a special thread I’ll make about years old incel/blackpill content I found in other unsuspecting forums.
 
Last edited:
Never payed attention to any of that shit tbh
 
Dating advice is one of the few industries where you can promise literally anything and nobody regulates it.
 
And Sex Industry.
Explain.

Also, after authorities found out that ER was on PUAhate, the fact that no institution looked into the shady stuff that was (and still is) going on within the dating niche goes to show you how hopeless any resolution is.
Same with Minassian.

I’ll ask AI about this thread right now …
 
PUA faded as the “looksmaxxers” came
 
I’ll ask AI about this thread right now …
AI basically said no one has ever been convicted/jailed in the dating niche for this stuff and that issues tend to be handled through public criticism or refund disputes, not criminal courts. Bad coaching might just only lead to complaints or lawsuits under consumer protection (no matter how much money is involved) because even if the advertisements offered guarantees, it's still seen as "marketing fluff" JFL.

However when it comes to life advice coaching, everything is the opposite (lawsuits for manipulating the vulnerable, offering guarantees and high fees). Clown World

All the lawsuits against dating roaches have been confidential, compared to life coaches

While specific high-profile cases are scarce, legal experts confirm that dating coaches have faced lawsuits for things like
  • breach of contract (e.g., "You'll find love in 90 days.” "I've helped 5,000 men get married." "Everyone who takes my course gets a girlfriend.")
  • exaggerating credentials or success rates with vague or inflated statistics like "Most clients see results after just one session," which can be misleading if not backed by data. They may present stories or reviews that suggest high success, sometimes without verifying them.
  • diagnosing health condition / being misdiagnosed or misled about their mental health (with things like "You have narcissistic personality disorder," or "You're depressed and need medication.”)
  • experiencing emotional harm from unqualified "healing" sessions for childhood abuse, PTSD, or panic attacks, despite lacking clinical training. (Normie bullshit)
  • paying thousands for coaching that promised psychological transformation to "reprogram your subconscious," "heal attachment wounds," or "resolve deep emotional blocks," (for the purposes of dating I assume) but delivered none.
The AI included what people have threatened to sue over (like fake testimonies) btw

At least it seems to be a bipartisan effort to attack the the dating sector (senators in Sept 2025 probed Match Group over romance scam phishing bots), but only insofar as scams and corporations. Nothing industry wide
 
Last edited:
AI basically said no one has ever been convicted/jailed in the dating niche for this stuff and that issues tend to be handled through public criticism or refund disputes, not criminal courts. Bad coaching might just only lead to complaints or lawsuits under consumer protection (no matter how much money is involved) because even if the advertisements offered guarantees, it's still seen as "marketing fluff" JFL.

However when it comes to life advice coaching, everything is the opposite (lawsuits for manipulating the vulnerable, offering guarantees and high fees). Clown World

All the lawsuits against dating roaches have been confidential, compared to life coaches




At least it seems to be a bipartisan effort to attack the the dating sector (senators in Sept 2025 probed Match Group over romance scam phishing bots), but only insofar as scams and corporations. Nothing industry wide
Dating advice is one of the few industries where you can promise literally anything and nobody regulates it.

So yeah as I was saying, nothing industry wide, let alone niche wide.

Perhaps there have been confidential cases with indexed links I should ask AI about.

Either way, dating roaches can still get away with selling “smooth talk your way into any hot girl you want with my course” with no protections for vulnerable genetic deadends or autists. And I don’t see any solutions on how it can be regulated. Only upside is that if you really got scammed of a lot of money, you could probably get your money back if you push for it all the way.

As long as PUAs 1.) don’t claim to be affiliated with an institution/famous people they never were, 2.) don’t make any direct concrete/measurable/ numerical guarantees of success inside the marketing or course, or 3.) try to diagnose their clients with disorders and recommend pharma jewpills—
it’s free reign. Everything else is deemed as advice or opinions :fuk:

To give an example of how much leeway these PUAs have, when Todd Valentine was apart of RSD, he used to run a monetized course called “3 girls a day” but he probably never guaranteed that following his course will make anyone who paid for it get that result. So it’s “legal” and allowed to be monetized. Despite that program being filled with recorded material of him having morning afternoon and evening dates that “turned into sex,” and talking constantly about how much sex he was having in a day. And that’s me giving Todd the benefit of the doubt that he did NOT guarantee ‘3 girls a day’
IMG 2772

Look at that chilling smile. Reminds me of my dad

It’s so deregulated, that andrew tate can get away with basically scamming losers on camgirl sites who thought they were going to meet up with hot sex symbols to date/marry in front of millions of people’s faces. He calls entertaining and scamming these incels in denial “saving them from ending it all” JFL.

Any one who gets big off of anything sex/dating industry related might be charismatic, but likely untrustworthy people as a whole with some elements of the dark tetrad.

Also, I meant to put
"I've helped 5,000 men get married." "Everyone who takes my course gets a girlfriend."
as examples of exaggerating success rates
 
Last edited:
Haven't you seen the exorbitant amounts these whores charge for "exclusive OF content?" There's basically no limit.
That’s an example of marketing fluff that isn’t as predatory as PUAs are. At least with the OF toilets, they say it’s “juicy:ahegao:” even though there’s free porn everyone else. With the PUAs, their marketing is “get any hot girl you want.” Scroll up and read what I said about Todd Valentine… he makes videos and talks regularly about “gaming” 9s and 10s. And “hot girl blaise”
And people willingly pay millions for bland, low effort art btw.
When the subhuman pay $10k for a coaching session, they don’t even get value from it. More like a loss of value

Exorbitant prices are usually considered scammy when you are on your way out or in the middle of a service (a better example would be if an onlyfans girl like Lil Tay raised the price from let’s say $5 on her day-one release to $10,000 the day before the monthly recurring subscription charges every user. Or a picture that costed $1 to buy, but charged you a $6,900 fee if you screenshotted it. Things like that, if they even exist).

I thought you were going to reference penis enlargement pills, or romance scams on the likes of what andrew tate did on camgirl sites.
 
Last edited:
Nothing happens because the men who are the type to buy dating coaching are the same to want to keep everything about it down low. No man wants society to view him as someone who ever struggled with women to the point of needing help. That's why all these disputes are confidential.


Another reason is gynocentricism. Once you start to legally regulate the dating niche or adjacent niches, then lots of foids will be found being liable. Their primary weapon against men can't be taken away now, can it?
Tagging those online: @AsiaCel @Misogynist Vegeta @AssyrianCel @Paladin @GeckoBus @Stupid Clown @Oneitiscel @drowningindenial @SlayerSlayer @ItsovERfucks
 
It'd be very difficult to charge them with false advertising. Society very clearly does not give a shit about men. Neither does the legal system.
 
The state defends bluepillers
 
Total state of PUA in 2025 is to grift incels with a bold face. This guy literally… literally commented that his goal was complete by being featured on Rehab Room.
He then goes on to basically admit in the video that his “primal switch” marketing was a grift he doesn’t stand by AND that he’s now inviting Yad to a PUA competition collab :feelskek: :feelskek:

View: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Lxfsc22SafY


It’d be truly funny if it weren’t for the fact that he’s taking advantage of autistic inkwells. PUAs are scum man, but at least this guy is funneling redpilled normies into the blackpill pipeline the hardest
 
Total state of PUA in 2025 is to grift incels with a bold face. This guy literally… literally commented that his goal was complete by being featured on Rehab Room.
He then goes on to basically admit in the video that his “primal switch” marketing was a grift he doesn’t stand by AND that he’s now inviting Yad to a PUA competition collab :feelskek: :feelskek:

View: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Lxfsc22SafY


It’d be truly funny if it weren’t for the fact that he’s taking advantage of autistic inkwells. PUAs are scum man, but at least this guy is funneling redpilled normies into the blackpill pipeline the hardest


And now he’s proving that the people attacking him brought him the most sales JFL. Can’t believe itv didn’t see/think this
 

Similar threads

tagenok
Replies
2
Views
554
Halfpassedover
Halfpassedover
4RAB.GUY
Replies
18
Views
444
xxdarkpixelsxx
xxdarkpixelsxx
R
Replies
17
Views
424
JewProducER
JewProducER
Castaway
Replies
22
Views
755
OverLoner
OverLoner

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top