While pretty much everyone here would agree that the 'you're not entitled to sex' line is retarded, one thing that stands out to me is the fact that normal females never follow this logic. If you see posts from females about relationships that are lacking in sex, or even lacking in the specific kind of sexual fetishes that they like, you will see that many of them will rapidly turn to cheating or end the relationship if the situation doesn't seem fixable. Furthermore, if you look at the comments from others on such posts, you will notice a clear theme; other females will heavily insist that it is unhealthy and unnatural for any person to go without satisfying sex. Everyone will be preaching the fact that staying in a sexually unsatisfying relationship is bad for your mental state and everyone will say that the female in question deserves a partner that will meet her needs.
Why do normies never bring this up when talking about inceldom? Why, when they fully admit that a lack of sex is unhealthy and punishing on a person, do they insist that we don't need it or deserve it? The answer is pretty clear: they know that nobody wants to have sex with us, and so they don't want us to expect any kind of sex within our lives. They can tell an average female that she deserves sex because they know that someone will likely have sex with her, but they can never say such a thing to an average man, because they know that there is a real possibility that nobody will want to have sex with him. Telling us that we don't deserve sex simply removes the burden of ever having to provide it from them.
So what does this mean for us? Simply but, it means that we absolutely do deserve sex. It's a well-established fact that a total lack pf intimacy is unhealthy for any person, and almost everyone agrees that someone that is not harming anyone deserves a chance to have a fulfilling life. Now, in most situations where someone deserves something but we are worried that they may not get it, we make it a law that is must be provided to them in some way. With this in mind, the idea of it being a legal obligation for some females to have relationships with us makes sense and would be the humane way of dealing with a potential incel crisis as the dynamic between sexes becomes more strained.
Why do normies never bring this up when talking about inceldom? Why, when they fully admit that a lack of sex is unhealthy and punishing on a person, do they insist that we don't need it or deserve it? The answer is pretty clear: they know that nobody wants to have sex with us, and so they don't want us to expect any kind of sex within our lives. They can tell an average female that she deserves sex because they know that someone will likely have sex with her, but they can never say such a thing to an average man, because they know that there is a real possibility that nobody will want to have sex with him. Telling us that we don't deserve sex simply removes the burden of ever having to provide it from them.
So what does this mean for us? Simply but, it means that we absolutely do deserve sex. It's a well-established fact that a total lack pf intimacy is unhealthy for any person, and almost everyone agrees that someone that is not harming anyone deserves a chance to have a fulfilling life. Now, in most situations where someone deserves something but we are worried that they may not get it, we make it a law that is must be provided to them in some way. With this in mind, the idea of it being a legal obligation for some females to have relationships with us makes sense and would be the humane way of dealing with a potential incel crisis as the dynamic between sexes becomes more strained.
