AntiPain
just put custom title theory
-
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2018
- Posts
- 3,401
You think it's just animals right? Bullshit. Check the comments and the fucking title.
People will use a fucking animal fight to promote agenda.
"YOU GO GARL! DAMN THOSE MATERNAL INSTINCTS THOUGH!"
It's obvious to anyone with an IQ higher than 50 that it's political and ideological.
The bear mother, although she's an animal, represents the human mother.
The tiger represents the male, looks strong and intimidating.
"Mothers will go to great lengths to protect their offspring" is the first text block displayed on their video.
Notice there's no mention of animalistic behavior, it's purposely written so to equate an animal mother to a human mother (although we are animals).
It's true, mothers, both animal and human ones will do so. However, humans won't statistically show this behavior as much as animals
because of variations, we have more variations than animals when it comes to actual performance, and they still try to show it like it applies to both
at the same probability.
You can look at the comments and see the support for the bear. Truth is, when talking about such stories each story will represent something that applies
in a way to human society. Here it's the feminist idea, showing the female mother as a hero and the tiger as the enemy.
National Geographic obviously used this in a feminist manner in order to gain support and views, but this video shows the political fight and the constant
attempt to glorify any female attribute as good and positive, as motherhood is indeed a female attribute.