Wombcel98
Chinless abomination | 5.5" wrists | NEET
-
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2019
- Posts
- 586
Don't try to be pc no one gives a rats ass about that here
I'd say they peak both mentally and physically at age 16. Men peak both mentally and physically at age 28. So mid-teens for women, late 20s for men.Physically, they probably peak at about 20. Women who have been in athletics usually don't develop peak muscle tone until mid-college. Mentally, probably about 14. That's when they're naive and curious about their new sexuality and just want to be around men.
According to Wikipedia that should be at age 20 or below, but they don't give you exact information on when a woman is most fertile. I'd guess it's around age 15-16, that's not pc enough though so they don't dare to mention it, also intercourse at that age is illegal in some countries.In 2 of the most grueling sports. Gymnastic and swimming. Foids peak early. 20 and under. But a universal answer may be is when their eggs count/quality and fertility rate is at its optimum.
According to the statistics they show us. It's because intercourse is illegal below the age of 18 in many places, plus "science" is pc. The true peak of fertility is probably between 14-17 years of age. Some girls are ready to conceive as early as the age of 9.in terms of fertility it's early 20s tho.
think what you want bro, if scientific studies won't make you change your mind, i won't either. but just so you know, teen foids are 18% more likely to have autistic kids than girls in their 20s.According to the statistics they show us. It's because intercourse is illegal below the age of 18 in many places, plus "science" is pc. The true peak of fertility is probably between 14-17 years of age. Some girls are ready to conceive as early as the age of 9.
It's 14 in Germany, but only if you're 18 or younger yourself. It's weird, like most German laws. But I think it's better than most other aoc laws.16 IMO and it's the legal AoC where I am, not that it matters
Bluepill, like most "science" these days ... I'd believe it if "teen foids" were underdeveloped 12-14 year olds, but 16 yos are definitely just as fertile as 20 year olds if not more than that.think what you want bro, if scientific studies won't make you change your mind, i won't either. but just so you know, teen foids are 18% more likely to have autistic kids than girls in their 20s.
Those are reliable stats bro. It's fine if you want to fuck 16yos, I won't judge you, but don't let your fetish cloud your judgement.Bluepill, like most "science" these days ... I'd believe it if "teen foids" were underdeveloped 12-14 year olds, but 16 yos are definitely just as fertile as 20 year olds if not more than that
Reliable stats like 30 year old women being the most attractive? Like "roasties" not being a thing cause the vagina stays the same no matter how many partners a woman had? Stats like the most attractive height in online dating is 5'8-5'10" for a man? They will tell you so many lies these days.Those are reliable stats bro. It's fine if you want to fuck 16yos, I won't judge you, but don't let your fetish cloud your judgement.
I have voted 18+ and nothing else
I'm not about to discuss it again, but where did I imply that 30 years old is the most attractive age or anything of the sort? The facts that teen foids are much more likely to have premature birth and are 18% more likely to have autistic kids than women in their 20s are not "Jewish science", but simple objective statistics.Reliable stats like 30 year old women being the most attractive? Like "roasties" not being a thing cause the vagina stays the same no matter how many partners a woman had? Stats like the most attractive height in online dating is 5'8-5'10" for a man? They will tell you so many lies these days.
It's not a fetish it's simple biology. 16 is the prime age according to most honest men.
Jfl jfl jfl jfl who are they fooling with that? Ideal height for men is 6'1" and above only. Anything else is delusion..Stats like the most attractive height in online dating is 5'8-5'10" for a man? They will tell you so many lies these days.
Jfl jfl jfl jfl who are they fooling with that? Ideal height for men is 6'1" and above only. Anything else is delusion..
It's still not a fetish, no need to apologize. I don't trust the statistics at all though.I'm not about to discuss it again, but where did I imply that 30 years old is the most attractive age or anything of the sort? The facts that teen foids are much more likely to have premature birth and are 18% more likely to have autistic kids than women in their 20s are not "Jewish science", but simple objective statistics.
And sure, probably most men consider teens to be more attractive than women in their 20s, but that doesn't change those statistics. And sorry for my awkward wording, I don't think having a fetish for teens is something to be ashamed of.
I just checked the definition of that word, and you are right, it's not a fetish.It's still not a fetish, no need to apologize. I don't trust the statistics at all though.
Do you possibly know the name of that study / have a link? Sounds at least worthy to check out.I just checked the definition of that word, and you are right, it's not a fetish.
I also don't trust every statistics out there, but the ones I brought up are pretty reliable and they had quite a big sample (over 5 milion autistic kids).
Do you possibly know the name of that study / have a link? Sounds at least worthy to check out.
I'll read the entire thing tomorrow. I wonder what the circumstances are though. Teen moms could disproportionally be having autistic children due to drug abuse or failed birth control etc. which would explain the autism peak. I don't think it's due to lack of fertility. Also "teen" can mean 13 yo (which is a little young) and 18 or even 19 yo (which is perfect for fertilization, probably even better than being 20 yo) ... it's always important to know the details when reading studies like this. Unless proven otherwise I'll keep on believing in peak fertility at age 16 since it makes sense from a biological perspective. As correlation doesn't mean causation, I'll remain sceptical of what the study appears to have found.Increased risk of autism with teen moms
Researchers found an increased risk of autism in children born to teen mothers and in children whose parents have a large gap between their ages. The analysis, which looked at autism rates among 5.7 million children in five countries, is the largest ever to confirm a higher risk in those born to...www.sciencedaily.com
I don't think it's that simple tbh. Autism is almost enitrely genetic, but it could be "triggered" by parents' age.I'll read the entire thing tomorrow. I wonder what the circumstances are though. Teen moms could disproportionally be having autistic children due to drug abuse or failed birth control etc. which would explain the autism peak. I don't think it's due to lack of fertility. Also "teen" can mean 13 yo (which is a little young) and 18 or even 19 yo (which is perfect for fertilization, probably even better than being 20 yo) ... it's always important to know the details when reading studies like this.
If the study was about 13-14 year old teens I'd believe them in an instant, as many 13-14 year olds are not yet ready to be fertilized. But if they mean 16-19 year olds by "teens" I just can't fathom they'd be more prone to autistic children for reasons of fertility ... there must be another thing causing this. It was totally normal to be pregnant at the age of 17-18 just a few generations ago, and autism rates were actually lower.I don't think it's that simple tbh. Autism is almost enitrely genetic, but it could be "triggered" by parents' age.
I think women are at their most fertile around 20-22, but you need to keep in mind that foids age faster than they used to because of their diet and lifestyle, so what once used to be a prime looks-wise, is not a prime anymore (at least in western countries).
No, actually most 16 year olds I knew had a developed body. I've known 13 year old foids with the body of an adult.Early 20s is most fertile years (actually proven by science age). Jfl at '16 is most fertile'. Have you seen average 16 year olds irl, they still look like awkward pimply children. By 20 they learned how to dress/makeup and look the best at that age BC they're put together like adults but don't have wrinkles/alot of fat yet. Teens aren't done growing and in no way are at their most fertile, because their bodies couldn't handle pregnancy. Call me whatever but I stand by 18 year old law. If they live in a culture where they make homemade food, don't drink alcohol, and stay active then their peak fertile period can stretch up to 30.
I think it's because autists wouldn't breed at all in the past, they would often die in their youth. Autism is often linked to other physical heath problems. Even now, when our health care is much more advanced, autists die at the age of 36 on average. Still, autistic people, or people carrying autism gene, get to breed and spread their autistic genes on a bigger scale than in the past. That's just my retarded theory though, since I haven't found any paper about this.If the study was about 13-14 year old teens I'd believe them in an instant, as many 13-14 year olds are not yet ready to be fertilized. But if they mean 16-19 year olds by "teens" I just can't fathom they'd be more prone to autistic children for reasons of fertility ... there must be another thing causing this. It was totally normal to be pregnant at the age of 17-18 just a few generations ago, and autism rates were actually lower.
source?think what you want bro, if scientific studies won't make you change your mind, i won't either. but just so you know, teen foids are 18% more likely to have autistic kids than girls in their 20s.
source?
>Autism rates were 18 percent higher among children born to teen moms than among those born to moms in their 20s.here ya goIncreased risk of autism with teen moms
Researchers found an increased risk of autism in children born to teen mothers and in children whose parents have a large gap between their ages. The analysis, which looked at autism rates among 5.7 million children in five countries, is the largest ever to confirm a higher risk in those born to...www.sciencedaily.com