I suppose that after most incels have been removed from the gene pool, next generation will have it better.
Or will still be the same in the future?
Or will still be the same in the future?
Discussion When current gen incels die, will there be less incels in the future?
Yes. We are having a shrinking population but the new population will be more physically attractive and taller with better genetic health. All the genetic trash incels are simply being bred out of the genepool. Look at the netherlands most boomers there are over 6ft tall? What happened? The short men were simply bred out of existence.
T
Genetic garbage women are still reproducing, so incels will still exist. However yes there will be less of them given that more and more women are choosing to get creampied by chad or chad-lites instead of their looksmatch, even if it means they will end up single mothers.
no, in fact, the phenotype of the mother is incredibly important. you can't exterminate genetically subpar males without exterminating subhuman females.
But if the chance of offspring is 50% male, 50% female, it could be that there will be less of subpar females reproducing, or if they do they will only do it with chads, so in average there will be an improvement....
ugly women are still breeding . so no
ugly women are still breeding . so no
Hypergamy produces more incels, and it also makes the experience of inceldom worse. It's a lose lose situation basically.
ugly women are still breeding . so no
No, inceldom will always get worse forever, looking at the macro trends
I wouldn't worry about it too much we will all be dead soon boyos
Macros me
actually it's kind of impossible to raise the average, it would be a paradox. some mammals such as big cats, are aesthetic on average though. however in humans there's high variation, diversity, and it's there for a reason.
No. Europe will simply collapse into tribalistic stone age and some part of Europe will just be absorbed into a Muslim empire
This is true. But at the same time women will have more and more "standards" that will be met by fewer and fewer men. In other words, 80/20 rule is now 90/10 rule soon to be 95/5. So even though more guys will be taller and better looking the women will still only accept the top tier men. Thus there will be more incels in the future. 100 years from now the incels will look like today's chad or chad lite. And the women will choose giga chad only. Also the bottom tier foids are still reproducing which will continue to poison the gene pool especially for men.
Men will fuck anything and subhuman women exist so no.
Not sure what planet you are from if you think incels can simply be bred out. Ugly foids will still breed and incels will be created out of them. It is possible for inceldom to be solved through some means as it becomes bigger problem.
Only if the blackpill spreads enough where men finally stand up against hypergamy.
Since I don’t expect hypergamy to end anytime soon, no. There will be a lot more incels in the future as hypergamy continues.
Since I don’t expect hypergamy to end anytime soon, no. There will be a lot more incels in the future as hypergamy continues.
Pigskins are declining
The way I see it there have been several reproduction disruptors. The first one was contraception, that allowed sex without consequences. And the second and last one has been social media, which created a greater sex imbalance than ever before. There were always incels, but now there are many more than ever before. Plus graycels which are on the rise, because it has become so damn hard to be selected. But over a couple of generations, maybe the field will level. There might not be that many ugly females that choose to reproduce, who knows without access to solid data about attractiveness and reproduction.
Hypergamy is increasing
Women's stardards are increasing
The number of incels is growing
The number of gays and trannies is growing
The number of simps is growing
The amount of money women can earn from OnlyFans is increasing
Women's SMV is increasing
Men's SMV is decreasing
The number of men having sex is decreasing
...
ALL the trends are bad and point to a future where nearly all men are incels, and no man is worth of having sex with any female, and humanity goes extinct.
Women's stardards are increasing
The number of incels is growing
The number of gays and trannies is growing
The number of simps is growing
The amount of money women can earn from OnlyFans is increasing
Women's SMV is increasing
Men's SMV is decreasing
The number of men having sex is decreasing
...
ALL the trends are bad and point to a future where nearly all men are incels, and no man is worth of having sex with any female, and humanity goes extinct.
Where there are men there are incels. Unless like 80% women, that'd be cool, I'd score
Y
You can only hope tbh a life of an incel looking male is a life of constant loneliness and emptiness at best.
jbwmaxxing and average looking males breeding with extremely low SMV foids will offset a lot of this though.
The improvement will be less fast and lesser magnitude than if only good looking people (males and foids) breed. But (and not defending how society is trending) as long as at least one side that breeds is getting better looking (like is happening with only better looking males than in the past breeding) and taller then their children will be more likely to be taller and better looking than before outside of situations with genetic recombination. Already kids are taller than in previous generations.
jbwmaxxing and average looking males breeding with extremely low SMV foids will offset a lot of this though.
This is a bit of a cope tbh. This really won’t do anything to solve shit. Let’s say only good looking men breed, it’s still not going to stop the birth of ugly men since the foids are also ugly. There are also recessive genes so that’s also a thing.
As for the height thing, I honestly think it has more to do with better nutrition if anything.
Y
That sucks then. If eugenics is going to be applied it should be done evenly across men and women and not just men as is happening now. A lot of ugly foids could stop breeding though because their standards get too high to want to have children with anyone except chad so that's one way that can be avoided for ugly foids breeding with average looking men.
Aren't a lot of ugly white foids already childfree?
Could be a combination of many factors tbh
Last edited:
The best solution would be to create artificial wombs. And there will also be a way to select genes for your child before he is even born. This is the ideal way to solve the problem.
Y
China and Russia will probably lead the way with gene editing and gene selection and they are ascending while the US (where a lot of opposition to that kind of overt thing) is declining so you can hope.
Artificial wombs though? Not a chance if even those countries see that as anti woman and completely unnatural going against nature's design for things (which they probably will). Gene editing and designer babies are much more acceptable to governments than artificial wombs.
Not even surprised that the west would do something like that. This is really why incels and non-cucks need their own country. So that we can have a government that can fully facilitate the development of artificial wombs so we can completely replace foids.
Y
But even China and Russia would oppose artificial wombs imo it's just a step too far for them. Remember they might be less pro woman than western countries but not to that extent.
Easier said than done ngl there's very little livable land left on Earth that doesn't belong to someone or the other. Incels would do better focusing on both pursuits but with some remainder of incels staying in existing countries. If all incels flee to one place that leaves that place vulnerable. And just because incels have made their own country doesn't mean cucks are going to leave you alone.
Y
There is clearly a limit before women will agree to settle for a relationship. You just have to be tall and white and at least average in looks. So imo the idea that today's chad becomes tomorrow's normie is not accurate.
Y
Imo it doesn't continue forever. That's kind of a cope by uglier men that one day chads will pay too. The floor for what is considered an attractive man can get raised but not indefinitely. In that alternate reality women would at least still give those men a chance. But there is no such chance when considering for example unremarkable, short, small ethnic males that are not physically attractive and have no traits that can be virtue signaled about. Nor will there ever be probably.
You know the most lowkey hated, annoying (when they talk, "weird" and "quiet" when they don't) kid in class that no one wants to be around because of how they look completely unremarkable, average and boring? It's always that type of guy where even legit disabled and facially deform guys mog them in terms of social status and social proof.
You see this even in the concern about men's issues that some people in society may have a small amount of (like social conservatives). It's all about white or black males that meet a minimum look threshold and have been in relationships before or are disabled @RREEEEEEEEE
If there is concern about the average man falling behind it's still portrayed as at least a chadlite or committed family man going through hard times. Average looking non-NT males that don't have any traits that can be admired or virtue signaled about and have not been in relationships have nothing going for them and the problem is always seen as them not getting good or working on their craft
ngl it goes beyond even attractiveness and covers the very definition of what it means to be considered fully human. As it is now there's males in society that are not considered men and not considered attractive to any woman. That won't be the situation as much in your alternate reality where only attractive men and women mated. There would for example be no currycels or sandcels in that reality (who have only managed to persist in large numbers because of enforced monogamy in ethnic countries).
Last edited:
No since women's standards keep increasing
If everyone is attractive women would go for gigachads instead of chads
If everyone is attractive women would go for gigachads instead of chads
W
Definitely no, as long as hypergamy is allowed to continue. Women will go only for top tier men. Men overall getting more attractive won't change anything. Women standards will just continue to get higher. We can see this happening in Sweden or Netherlands. The incels there could easily slay in other countries. Couse of the insane standard women have there.
Y
There's a limit tbh otherwise 80% of men would be incels that could never get sex. That obviously isn't true so while women are indeed still "settling" for the majority of men the majority of those men are still getting sex.
It goes beyond hate tbh they just prefer not to even acknowledge your existence unless they can make fun of you or culturally appropriate any exotic characteristics of what they see as "your" culture (they don't see nonchad men as individuals but as stereotypes).sucks to be a part of the group women hate the most
Last edited:
ugly women are still breeding . so no
Y
Exactly there's a limit. It may not be 30% like now but it's not likely to be the full 80% of nonchad men (assuming the 80/20 rule is legit when it's more like 95/5 on dating apps tbh).
It is isn't it?
Normies having kids with ugly women will result in more incels
What are the middle east’s view on this?
There are many authoritarian countries that cucks don’t like that still exist. Hell, Saudi Arabia is somewhat of an ally of the US. Two things you would need are nukes and the protection of a powerful country
There will be no incel in the future, because the environmental catastrophe would have killed any human on Earth.
Y
Conferences on sex robots have been threatened with violence by radical islamists. Muslim countries like Malaysia have outright banned discussion of sex robots in public. Traditionalists of any type aren't your friend in this venture.
Child sex dolls, human-bot babies and the end of society: RT attends London’s Sex Robot Conference
Will it be possible for humans and robots to procreate? Could bots see the demise of female humans? And what about pedophiles – should they be given child sex dolls? RT went to the Love and Sex Robots Conference to find out.
Malaysia Bans International Sex Robot Symposium
"Intercourse with robots—don't try to be ridiculous," say Malaysian police.
reason.com
Saudi Arabia was the first country to give citizenship to a female robot
-
FIRST THEY CAME FOR THE SEXBOTS – There’s nothing sacred for the jihadis: The Third International Congress in Love and Sex with Robots has been rocked by terror threats from …
thedailychrenk.com
In Saudi Arabia, female robot gets rights, real women restricted
'Sophia' becomes first android granted citizenship, but critics point out that kingdom is allowing her to do what actual women and non-Muslims cannot
www.timesofisrael.com
Saudi Robot Sophia is Now Advocating For Women's Rights
In November, Sophia became the first robot to ever receive citizenship of any country.
www.newsweek.com
I guess not. It is more of a progressive thing in some aspect although liberals are definitely not our friends in this either. But I have read comment sections on sexbot videos and most seem either neutral or supportive. It’s usually just roasties who whine about it.
Y
Massive cope tbh
Make no mistake traditionalists (particularly the religious kind) would kill to make this illegal and try to kill or at least jail any man that tries to partake in this kind of thing out of talk about "degeenracy."
Progressives and liberals used to be a lot more neutral on things like this (I'm sure you even remember the time that used to be true) but now they are similarly very authoritarian but for different reasons ("concerns" about robotic sex dolls normalizing lack of consent and rape for example)
To their credit they are still fine with sex toy copes like fleshlights which most traditionalists have always opposed
Anti-Obscenity Enforcement Act - Wikipedia
Last edited:
The biggest cope is to think humankind is doing enough about the environmental catastrophe to stop it.
Nobody's able to stop the unavoidable effects of today's lack of concern about climate change, mass life extinction, heatwaves, droughts, fires and non-renewable resources shortages.
Y
DAC
A startup using minerals to draw down CO2 has scored funding – and its first buyer
Heirloom Carbon Technologies believes it can pull off carbon removal for $50 a ton, and aims to remove one billion tons by 2035.
Stripe funds 6 new ideas to suck carbon out of the atmosphere
Growing kelp, crushing rocks, zapping seawater — what's next?
grist.org
High Hopes claims stratospheric breakthrough in direct air CO2 capture
In the race to get humanity toward zero carbon emissions by 2050, the vast majority of efforts will rightly be focused on reducing emissions at their source. But there are areas where this simply won't be possible, and as carbon taxes gradually rise around the globe there will definitely be a…
newatlas.com
Btw no matter how bad climate change gets some portion of humanity would still survive. Just like a meteor impact on the same scale that killed the dinosaurs wouldn't do it either.
Mount Toba eruption almost wiped out humanity yet humanity persisted.
Last edited:
No because low quality genetics comes from Women, not men. And women will almost always get to reproduce if they want to.
I actually had to do a double take when reading that. How can an object even consent? It’s like crying over a pencil not consenting to you writing with it. But the economic benefits are so high that atleast a couple companies will try to develop them. In the end of the day, it’s all about moneyMake no mistake traditionalists (particularly the religious kind) would kill to make this illegal and try to kill or at least jail any man that tries to partake in this kind of thing out of talk about "degeenracy."
Progressives and liberals used to be a lot more neutral on things like this (I'm sure you even remember the time that used to be true) but now they are similarly very authoritarian but for different reasons ("concerns" about robotic sex dolls normalizing lack of consent and rape for example)
To their credit they are still fine with sex toy copes like fleshlights which most traditionalists have always opposed
Anti-Obscenity Enforcement Act - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Y
Their real reason of course is a spiteful and petty desire to restrict any enjoyment nonchad males get but it's also because the object is female. Just like drawings of females have more rights and consideration than the average nonchad male.
Cope. Used to think this too. Where is the marketing to perpetually single males with them becoming a growing demographic for regular use items other than fetish, humiliation and low profile sex toy stuff? Nowhere to be found.
The world has decided sexless males are useless. If they market anything to you it's all things that put the blame on YOU (like PUA and lifestyle improvement "coaching") and act like you need to get in a relationship as soon as possible.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
