The only right stance is libertarianism
I didn't claim that but he probably represent the movement better than you, no offense.
So you are against neets, that was my point...
Wokeism that is turning women gay, Wokeism that is trying to end freedom of speech, Wokeism that is bringing immigrants over, Wokeism that makes women hate men. Among many other things, but if you can't see this ur really retarded
Libertarianism is the only good answer
i’m against neets that have no reason to not work… If you’re perfectly fine then you should be working. I won’t be telling someone with 5 mental illnesses to go to work.
Anybody who can't phrase a sentence without using the word 'retarded' in the scope of serious discussions needs more introspection for sure.
Bro you are the one not thinking here, it's not about money dude, it's about family, values, offspring, the left hates the classic nuclear family and has been trying to destroy it for over 50 years, you are just thinking economically, that's a retarded way to view things.
You don't have a comeback to my take just say it.
Yes, I do not have any comeback to an emotionally charged guy because it's pointless. If you were genuinely in for a curious open minded debate, then I'd give more efforts .
Ok I will try to maintain frame.
My point is, the left promotes the rainbow agenda which is turning many women gay, it makes the life of men 100x harder (it creates a large surplus of men), also the left has tried to destroy the nuclear family for over 50 years, this has been their end goal since forever, and they are succeeding, the left keeps empowering women while keeping men down, it causes more distress and instability to society.
I don't see why you would support such agenda, since it's only making your life harder, and essentially is what makes you an ink, whether you wanna accept it or not, I'm not saying conservatism is right either, as I mentioned before the right stance is libertarianism
Last edited:
Exactly. I support some left leaning ideas but I’d never go as far as to call myself a “leftist” and it’s pretty clear that the political left hates guys who fit into the inkwell archetype for simply existing.
Not only that, but the amount of damage this ideology has caused over the decades can't be measured
These are not the problems that are causing societal collapse.
Empowering women has eased the financial burden on so many men what about that?
I saw my dad toil his life to only provide for his family, would you think this is a good outcome from the conservative 'nuclear' family structure ?
I'd say your main problem is you think in black and white. I won't lie, I have been on your side a few years ago but thankfully no longer.
Focus on the elephant in the room: rich capitalists widening the wealth disparity, tech bros using AI as an excuse to pay workers less and fire them, rich bosses treating workers like mules.
Fo
slightly left leaning? Debatable. I personally don’t think it’s that bad. Communism? Objectively terrible.
What matters most in life is family and connection, your ideology is keeping people from forming families, your ideology has empowered women to a point where they think they are better than most men, and see most men as literally trash, your ideology has caused so much damage to humanity as a whole, I won't mention the death count because it is not necessary. Men want to get wives and form families, money is important? Yes, but is secondary, what we crave for is family and connection, and your ideology has taken this from us, if you can't see this, then there's no point in "debating " this subject with you.
Incredibly based take. But flooding the workplace with women who are almost always less competent than men was a bad idea from the get go. But we need to stop blaming foids and “dei” and start blaming these billionaire CEOs who are gonna replace us all with ai and robots in the next 10 years. They’re the ones who pushed for women to enter the workplace under the guise of “female empowerment” when they actually wanted to flood the labor market with more employees to get away with paying less to workers and generate more tax revenue. Because of women being expected to work now it is socially acceptable for houses to cost so much that both the man and woman must have a job in order to pay for it.
Last edited:
Empowering women and letting them get in the working force has destroyed the average man's chance of getting a wife, because now women can work and don't need men anymore, I know you will come up with that old comeback (hur dur but back then wives didn't love their husbands, they were only with them because they were providers) it doesn't really matter, this concept of love people have was formed by Hollywood and is unrealistic for most people.
Last edited:
There is a difference between social and economical
I can understand being economically left
But being socially left??? they literally support feminism and faggotry.
I can understand being economically left
But being socially left??? they literally support feminism and faggotry.
I would gladly do this, if I had the woman I love by my side and my kids, I would 100% do it willingly.
no offence and I don't mean to shame you for this, but you do not sound mature yet.
Fighting rich capitalists won't make women respect men again, it won't make women straight again, it won't make women obedient again, so what's the point? Only to get a few more dollars in my pocket? You are only thinking economically, I want a family and kids, Fighting the elites won't reset women to their factory settings.
Could you address my other points, and I'm eager to know why you think im not mature
How is that based, if that's what created inceldom? Braindead take imo, just think critically, empowering women only made them hate men even more and made them more entitled.
you're a currycel right?
Wokeism, pre 2013 leftists weren't so obnoxious, and women didn't hate men as much back then, society wasn't so divided
I wish but nah, I'm still waiting for you to address my posts, but you keep dodging em
I want more vote guys 
it would be mental illnesses that prevent the said person from functioning as intended. If they’re too low iq to work then yeah they would excluded. But if they’re low iq and can still do basic tasks then they would work something like construction. If they’re severally autistic to the point they need assistance to go to the bathroom then they wouldn’t work. If they’re simply autistic and have bad social skills, then you could put them on something like a desk job with minimal social interaction. There’s not really a white or black answer, as every mental illness has a spectrum and the further you’re in then the harder it will be for you to integrate into society.
None, I'm an anarchist
Fine, I respect that
I have my own opinions so i wouldn't class myself under any political ideology.
Tell me some policies that make them different from one another
Nigger
there is no direction for an outcast of society.
I’m economically left wing but socially / culturally more moderate and conservative
None
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
