Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

What's your favourite blackpill?

ReturnOfSaddam

ReturnOfSaddam

Eternal President of Iraq
★★★★
Joined
May 23, 2020
Posts
2,325
I'd have to think about this for a while but one of mine is the OKCupid Looks VS Personality rating thing. It's such a massive sample size and so undeniable. Even the thickness/density of the data points almost makes it look like a big fat pill. It's beautiful, anyone who denies this shit is legit retarded.
600px-OK_Cupid_Looks_Personality.png
 
Meeks. Extremely undeniable. IT NEVER touched it.
And personally the blackpill that introduced me to this community
 
Meeks. Extremely undeniable. IT NEVER touched it.
And personally the blackpill that introduced me to this community

Mine was probably Ted Bundy.

As well as Blackpill Jesus on the Lesbianpill, Dogpill and OkCupid statistics.
 
Every time a personality detector fails
 
I'd have to think about this for a while but one of mine is the OKCupid Looks VS Personality rating thing. It's such a massive sample size and so undeniable. Even the thickness/density of the data points almost makes it look like a big fat pill. It's beautiful, anyone who denies this shit is legit retarded.
600px-OK_Cupid_Looks_Personality.png
None of them, because I already knew them from the start
 
Meeks. Extremely undeniable. IT NEVER touched it.
And personally the blackpill that introduced me to this community
Yeah Meeks is just undeniable. Foids straight up admitting they want to be raped by him JFL.

My favourite thing about Meeks is how he's legit fucking retarded, there's a video of him giving out "just go for it brah" tier advice. The guy is genuinely unaware that his success is literally ALL down to genetics. It just drives home the utter blackpill even more.
 
Mine is facial attractiveness being the biggest predictor of IQ, even more than their parent's education. That was when I knew the world was super unfair, and that it was over to oblivion.
Yeah Meeks is just undeniable. Foids straight up admitting they want to be raped by him JFL.

My favourite thing about Meeks is how he's legit fucking retarded, there's a video of him giving out "just go for it brah" tier advice. The guy is genuinely unaware that his success is literally ALL down to genetics. It just drives home the utter blackpill even more.
I remember that video lmao
 
FACE.

Also, watch what women do, not listen to what they say.
 
Only male models have sex change my mind
 
1598482353440

This one, proves if you’re sub 8 you are automatically invisible to women
 
The drivers license pill and the dick pill

@LastGerman
 
Yeah Meeks is just undeniable. Foids straight up admitting they want to be raped by him JFL.

My favourite thing about Meeks is how he's legit fucking retarded, there's a video of him giving out "just go for it brah" tier advice. The guy is genuinely unaware that his success is literally ALL down to genetics. It just drives home the utter blackpill even more.
That video is legit hilarious he unironically says just believe in urself and ur dreams bro just bee yourself
 
The Meekspill is the very essence of the blackpill. Without him, we would just be a bunch of dudes with the wrong mindset regarding women. He singlehandedly proved us all right and that too on a global scale.
 
I'd have to think about this for a while but one of mine is the OKCupid Looks VS Personality rating thing. It's such a massive sample size and so undeniable. Even the thickness/density of the data points almost makes it look like a big fat pill. It's beautiful, anyone who denies this shit is legit retarded.
600px-OK_Cupid_Looks_Personality.png
I love how they rapidly took this down when Incels started using this as evidence to back up our claims.
 
The Meekspill of course

3rtqVWk
 
The Meekspill is the very essence of the blackpill. Without him, we would just be a bunch of dudes with the wrong mindset regarding women. He singlehandedly proved us all right and that too on a global scale.

This. Women really exposed themselves with the Meekspill.

I love all the black pills regarding attraction too (and how it's looks based), and all the black pills about relationships and money (and how ultimately money won't buy you anything except disinterested cooch).
 
That image is gold. It's Eurasian Tiger's most iconic work.
It depresses me everytime I look at it because it really depicts how we value something as superficial as looks above hard work and intelligence. It's just not fair...
 
It depresses me everytime I look at it because it really depicts how we value something as superficial as looks above hard work and intelligence. It's just not fair...
It basically summed up the blackpill perfectly and there are so many elements there. The ugly hapa kid is the icing on the cake.
 
Last edited:
Meekspill and the atomic blackpill
 
Mine is facial attractiveness being the biggest predictor of IQ, even more than their parent's education.
The fuck you talking about? It's the very opposite. There's absolutely no correlation between attractiveness, IQ or even Health!

Example:
"The authors find that there is some indication that attractiveness has an overall relationship with health among women, but little indication that male attractiveness relates to male health."
"Our study revealed no relation between intelligence and either attractiveness or face shape."
there was no relationship between attractiveness and actual academic performance (r = 0.03), but a strong positive correlation between attractiveness and perceived intelligence (r = 0.81), attractiveness and perceived academic performance (r = 0.74) and attractiveness and perceived conscientiousness (r = 0.81).
However a whitepill emerges:
There was a significant correlation between older age and higher actual academic performance

Sometimes attractiveness can be linked to "health", but that's because higher attractivness correlated with masculinity, and masculinity correlates with semen quality (higher sexual dimorphism), which obviously makes sense. But in the sense of actual health (immune function and so on) there's at most low, insignificant correlation.

Show me the studies that show otherwise, if they do exist, please.
You seem to be falling for the halo effect ( https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0148284 ).

Who the fuck told you face attractiveness correlates with IQ to any degree? Our wiki does not state such whatsoever.
 
Racepill, 100% provable and 100% potent to nonwhites
 
My favorite blackpill is the dark triad pill. Rapists, murderers, thieves, pedophiles, delinquents, bullies etc all tend to do better with women than normal men. Obviously looks still mog dark triad pill, but it's the ultimate proof that "good personality" and "treating women nice" is all just bullshit
 
To answer OP:
Chickens preferring more attractive people.
Second probably infants being able to tell who is attractive or not in milliseconds.
 
The heightpill killed me.
 
Loli Pill of course, it's such a deep black pill even other black pillers on this site have a hard time accepting it. The truth that girls are most loyal, most obedient, most easy to please, least hypergamous, and least bitchy when they are in the first/early stages of their sexual prime, and thus make for the best wives
 
My favorite blackpill is Invisible being incel.
Not only incel but the CEO of it.
 
My favorite blackpill is Invisible being incel.
Not only incel but the CEO of it.
He is a legit god. I know he always had the FaceAndLMS tag but I think Invisible is a cooler name. FaceAndLMS is obviously the better name for a youtube channel though.
 
Hope one day my bi racial kid will be strong and tall as him.
 
Loli Pill of course, it's such a deep black pill even other black pillers on this site have a hard time accepting it. The truth that girls are most loyal, most obedient, most easy to please, least hypergamous, and least bitchy when they are in the first/early stages of their sexual prime, and thus make for the best wives
High IQ
The LoliPill is a Hiroshima Nagasaki BLACKPILL
 
The fuck you talking about? It's the very opposite. There's absolutely no correlation between attractiveness, IQ or even Health!

Example:
"The authors find that there is some indication that attractiveness has an overall relationship with health among women, but little indication that male attractiveness relates to male health."
"Our study revealed no relation between intelligence and either attractiveness or face shape."
there was no relationship between attractiveness and actual academic performance (r = 0.03), but a strong positive correlation between attractiveness and perceived intelligence (r = 0.81), attractiveness and perceived academic performance (r = 0.74) and attractiveness and perceived conscientiousness (r = 0.81).
However a whitepill emerges:
There was a significant correlation between older age and higher actual academic performance

Sometimes attractiveness can be linked to "health", but that's because higher attractivness correlated with masculinity, and masculinity correlates with semen quality (higher sexual dimorphism), which obviously makes sense. But in the sense of actual health (immune function and so on) there's at most low, insignificant correlation.

Show me the studies that show otherwise, if they do exist, please.
You seem to be falling for the halo effect ( https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0148284 ).

Who the fuck told you face attractiveness correlates with IQ to any degree? Our wiki does not state such whatsoever.
I didn't mention health at all, or academic success. I specifically mentioned IQ, which if you watched the recent INCEL TV video, you would have seen it. IQ is purely genetic and can't be compensated by studying or education.


The study you posted is of twins, which means same dna thus appearance is different cause of environment. When the different genes result in different facial attractiveness (non twin studies), then it is the biggest correlate like in the study I linked.
 
Last edited:
I didn't mention health at all, or academic success. I specifically mentioned IQ, which if you watched the recent INCEL TV video, you would have seen it. IQ is purely genetic and can't be compensated by studying or education.


The study you posted is of twins, which means same dna thus appearance is different cause of environment. When the different genes result in different facial attractiveness (non twin studies), then it is the biggest correlate like in the study I linked.
Honestly that's a really weak link. As the Author said:
However, the relatively weak measure of physical attractiveness in the NCDS data is likely to attenuate the true association between general intelligence and physical attractiveness. At the same time, given that the attractiveness ratings of the NCDS respondents were given by their two elementary school teachers, who were largely aware of the students' cognitive ability from their academic work, it is also possible that there may be some halo effect, where more intelligent, better students are considered by their teachers to be physically more attractive. However, such a halo effect, if it exists, does not explain where the perception that more intelligent individuals are physically more attractive comes from. The results presented in this paper suggest that the perception is based on empirical reality (Kanazawa & Kovar, 2004).

ie. attractiveness was poorly measured with no controls from a biased source. Weak. That study, due to its purely statistical nature is actually really shitty. No control groups. Epidemiological studies are one of the weakest possible studies in science. It also is really weird that there'd be such a huge difference between UK and US which should really make you think.
Also academic success is strongly associated with IQ. It's a proxy measure.

Also, you ignored the most important meta-analysis I've presented. This is actually a very good study because it's a fucking meta-analysis and not some weak ass statistical finding:
 
Last edited:
Honestly that's a really weak link. As the Author said:
However, the relatively weak measure of physical attractiveness in the NCDS data is likely to attenuate the true association between general intelligence and physical attractiveness. At the same time, given that the attractiveness ratings of the NCDS respondents were given by their two elementary school teachers, who were largely aware of the students' cognitive ability from their academic work, it is also possible that there may be some halo effect, where more intelligent, better students are considered by their teachers to be physically more attractive. However, such a halo effect, if it exists, does not explain where the perception that more intelligent individuals are physically more attractive comes from. The results presented in this paper suggest that the perception is based on empirical reality (Kanazawa & Kovar, 2004).

ie. attractiveness was poorly measured with no controls from a biased source. Weak. That study, due to its purely statistical nature is actually really shitty. No control groups. Epidemiological studies are one of the weakest possible studies in science. It also is really weird that there'd be such a huge difference between UK and US which should really make you think.
Also academic success is strongly associated with IQ. It's a proxy measure.

Also, you ignored the most important meta-analysis I've presented. This is actually a very good study because it's a fucking meta-analysis and not some weak ass statistical finding:
" it is also possible that there may be some halo effect, where more intelligent, better students are considered by their teachers to be physically more attractive. "

If you believe this, you are not black pilled.
 
" it is also possible that there may be some halo effect, where more intelligent, better students are considered by their teachers to be physically more attractive. "

If you believe this, you are not black pilled.
That's author's conclusions not mine.
Also twins are not a limitation - different twins have different genes.... the whole point of the study is to show that meanwhile there is almost no variability in IQ between twins, there is in attractiveness, and as such, saying that attractiveness is highly correlated with IQ would obviously be wrong. Twins also allow you to check whether highly attractive twins have more IQ than less attractive twins.
In this study nothing of this sort has been found. Moreover it uses a reliable rating method, not your fucking teachers. Read the whole fucking study.
More attractive people get treated better their whole life. I think it obviously could show on IQ tests(which is again why twins were included there, since they'd be more likely to have a similar growing environment). Doesn't mean they are superior genetically, as evidenced by the health studies anyway. Incel.tv is not a scientist nor has any academic credentials so JFL at him.
 
Mine was probably Ted Bundy.

As well as Blackpill Jesus on the Lesbianpill, Dogpill and OkCupid statistics.
the lesbianpill and the dogpill were things I wondered about before but I coped hard with that "no, it can't be" jfl
 
it was just too obvious that the most important thing for getting the foid OF YOUR CHOICE is being attractive, that’s all.

I was blackpilled in the early 2000s when I was a teenager. I had many crushes that always had zero interest in me, I started noticing how the facial features of men dictated how they could get foids. Strong jaw, tall, normal sized nose, thin hunter eyes.
 
" it is also possible that there may be some halo effect, where more intelligent, better students are considered by their teachers to be physically more attractive. "

If you believe this, you are not black pilled.
JFL, that author must be retarded. The halo effect would literally be the opposite, attractive kids being considered more intelligent/better students.
 
the lesbianpill and the dogpill were things I wondered about before but I coped hard with that "no, it can't be" jfl
JFL I just remembered when I was younger was a rumour that this girl at school would let her dog eat her out. I laughed at the time thinking it was just ridiculous bullshit, either a rumour started by someone who disliked her or made up as a joke but now that I think about it it was probably true. Fucking hell.
it was just too obvious that the most important thing for getting the foid OF YOUR CHOICE is being attractive, that’s all.

I was blackpilled in the early 2000s when I was a teenager. I had many crushes that always had zero interest in me, I started noticing how the facial features of men dictated how they could get foids. Strong jaw, tall, normal sized nose, thin hunter eyes.
That's an interesting time to grow up. Is there any truth in the claims that foids were less bitchy/things were better back then? I know you didn't have any success but did it seem better for men? I mean these days they are just straight up rude and will openly talk about how they literally despise short men, etc.
 
Last edited:
That's author's conclusions not mine.
Also twins are not a limitation - different twins have different genes.... the whole point of the study is to show that meanwhile there is almost no variability in IQ between twins, there is in attractiveness, and as such, saying that attractiveness is highly correlated with IQ would obviously be wrong. Twins also allow you to check whether highly attractive twins have more IQ than less attractive twins.
In this study nothing of this sort has been found. Moreover it uses a reliable rating method, not your fucking teachers. Read the whole fucking study.
More attractive people get treated better their whole life. I think it obviously could show on IQ tests(which is again why twins were included there, since they'd be more likely to have a similar growing environment). Doesn't mean they are superior genetically, as evidenced by the health studies anyway. Incel.tv is not a scientist nor has any academic credentials so JFL at him.
This doesn't change the fact that in the general population, attractive people have higher iq's on average. Using twins is flawed because it controls for the genetic factors. A twin study usually involved genetic twins, unless this isn't the case this time.

.
JFL, that author must be retarded. The halo effect would literally be the opposite, attractive kids being considered more intelligent/better students.
Exactly, normies think intelligent people will be seen as more attractive lmao. That's what happens when you are bluepilled, you have backwards thinking.
 
This doesn't change the fact that in the general population, attractive people have higher iq's on average. Using twins is flawed because it controls for the genetic factors. A twin study usually involved genetic twins, unless this isn't the case this time.

.

Exactly, normies think intelligent people will be seen as more attractive lmao. That's what happens when you are bluepilled, you have backwards thinking.
That study involved both MZ and DZ twins, so that argument does not stand.
The statistical samples used in the study you linked simply do not bear scrutiny. If there is a correlation between attractiveness and IQ (as per meta-analyses) it'd stand as a relatively weak correlation anyway. Such a weak link could be easily explained by environmental factors (being treated as a subhuman etc.). IQ is not 100% genetic, it's MOSTLY genetic, and it's especially prone to getting lower by environmental factors (ie. it's easy to get it down because of shitty upbringing, but it's very hard to get it up once you reach your genetic potential).
 
That study involved both MZ and DZ twins, so that argument does not stand.
The statistical samples used in the study you linked simply do not bear scrutiny. If there is a correlation between attractiveness and IQ (as per meta-analyses) it'd stand as a relatively weak correlation anyway. Such a weak link could be easily explained by environmental factors (being treated as a subhuman etc.). IQ is not 100% genetic, it's MOSTLY genetic, and it's especially prone to getting lower by environmental factors (ie. it's easy to get it down because of shitty upbringing, but it's very hard to get it up once you reach your genetic potential).
Why do they not bear scrutiny?

Other studies also show support with attractiveness being important, and in those show attractiveness plus height is a better predictor than social status, like in that INCEL TV video. The study you pointed out was in the video he made, and he says it is the only study he found that shows no correlation.

Also, the study didn't look at people being ugly, but just attractive or not attractive, which can include normies an such. This doesn't mean that people treat them like subhumans, which would then not effect IQ from to social rejection.
 
This. Women really exposed themselves with the Meekspill.

I love all the black pills regarding attraction too (and how it's looks based), and all the black pills about relationships and money (and how ultimately money won't buy you anything except disinterested cooch).
Truly, Jeremy Meeks should be a saint here for his contributions to the blackpill.
 
The one where you can put mods on ignore.
 
Truly, Jeremy Meeks should be a saint here for his contributions to the blackpill.

And from what others have said, this motherfucker had the nerve to blue pill by saying, "just believe in yourself, bro."

JFL.
 

Similar threads

S
Replies
40
Views
688
DefeatedIncel
DefeatedIncel
B33troot
Replies
15
Views
475
over_department
over_department
Incline
Replies
16
Views
221
fukurou
fukurou
Racial-Identitarian
Replies
9
Views
519
illumizoldyck
illumizoldyck

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top