Give your reasoning why.
Experiment What’s more immoral, a 35 year old man banging a 13 year old foid or a 35 year old man?
Accidentally voted for the 13 year old foid one fuck
Homosexuality is abnormal since the only reason sex and 2 genders exist is reproduction. It's abnormal from a purely biological perspective.
Fucking a 13 year old is completely normal biologically speaking. If we go by the laws of nature there is absolutely 0 reasoning to be against it. Muh morals is not an argument btw and feminist reasoning. And "she's a child" is not just not an argument, but also objectively wrong. From a biological perspective they stop being children once they hit puberty.
Fucking a 13 year old is completely normal biologically speaking. If we go by the laws of nature there is absolutely 0 reasoning to be against it. Muh morals is not an argument btw and feminist reasoning. And "she's a child" is not just not an argument, but also objectively wrong. From a biological perspective they stop being children once they hit puberty.
The 35 year old man fucking a 13 year old girl is definitely more immoral.
As for what's more degenerate, I'd likely lean towards the man on man option.
As for what's more degenerate, I'd likely lean towards the man on man option.
Glows me XD
Well hopefully most people don’t fuck up the poll
I thought degenerate meant immoral. What are your definitions?
I see immoral as meaning not conforming with societal expectations and expected morals, a 13 year old foid is likely learning the basics to life still in school and the idea of her going home and getting fucked by an adult is quite against western societal standards and expected morals.
If you upped the age of the foid to 15 I would definitely vote the man on man being more immoral, as France has the AOC at 15 and I feel that's when a foid has a bearing on life enough to be doing her own things.
Degenerate behaviour is just degenerate, disgusting, unnatural, uncivil behaviour which I would classify the man on man option being regardless.
Are you from France?
35 year old man banging a 35 year old man is a gross violation of nature. Serves nothing but to spread aids and give the guy anal cancer. 35 year old man banging 13 year old girl is normal and natural and for most of history noone would bat an eye.
i think the second one or the first, not a big difference ngl
13 is still kid tier tbh. she must be at least 15 or 16 then answer is obvious
Is a 35 year old man more immoral? What?
You do realize 13 year olds have sex right?
I have a 13 yo cousin and I know how they look. I would have been repulsed to have a sex with a girl that age, they might be having sex with each other, but it's still a low age for a adult man to desire. But I think they're totally desirable by the time they turn 16.
You wouldn’t be repulsed to have sex with a man though?
Morality is a weird concept. Things that were okay before are not okay today. So given that the case is that we reach a consensus as humans as to what it's moral or not. We can say that:
A man banging a 13yo is seen as inmoral in today's society, thus it's the choice that i choose. A man banging another man is just gay, may be repulsible for some but in no way inmoral
A man banging a 13yo is seen as inmoral in today's society, thus it's the choice that i choose. A man banging another man is just gay, may be repulsible for some but in no way inmoral
So socially acceptability = morality?
Pretty much. We can go and say that we can differentiate between good and bad. But sociopaths exists, so how to explain that? Are we the good ones? Or are we just wired in a certain way?
Holy shit this is the purest form of sheep mentality.
Read the poll again
Similar threads
Discussion
What would you say is worse? Looking old as fuck for your age or looking too young for your age
- NIGGA BANBAN
- Inceldom Discussion
Sir Silentium
Users who are viewing this thread
