JFL What's Behind the Rise of Lonely, Single Men

[InMemoriam]

What's Behind the Rise of Lonely, Single Men

Men need to address their deficits to meet healthier relationship expectations.

www.psychologytoday.com

What's Behind the Rise of Lonely, Single Men
Men need to address their deficits to meet healthier relationship expectations.

Posted August 9, 2022

Reviewed by Hara Estroff Marano

Here are three broad trends in the relationship landscape that suggest heterosexual men are in for a rough road ahead:

Dating Apps. Whether you’re just starting to date or you’re recently divorced and dating again, dating apps are a huge driver of new romantic connections in the United States. The only problem is that upwards of 62% of users are men and many women are overwhelmed by the number of options they have.

Competition in online dating is fierce, and lucky in-person chance encounters with dreamy partners are rarer than ever.

Relationship Standards. With so many options, it’s not surprising that women are increasingly selective.

I do a live TikTok show (@abetterloveproject) and speak with hundreds of audience members every week; I hear recurring dating themes from women between the ages of 25 and 45: They prefer men who are emotionally available, who are good communicators, and who share their values.

Skills Deficits. For men, this means a relationship skills gap that, if not addressed, will likely lead to fewer dating opportunities and longer periods of being single. There's less patience for poor communication skills today.

The problem for men is that emotional connection is the lifeblood of healthy, long-term love and it requires all the skills that families still are not consistently teaching young boys.

While there’s probably no chance of stemming the rising tide of unintentional single men, there is some good news.

The algorithms are becoming increasingly more complex on dating apps and other online platforms. One result is that great matches are on the rise. One dating app, Hinge, found through beta trials that 90% of users rated their first date positively, with 72% indicating that they wanted a second date.

How can men reap the benefit of the algorithms? Level up your mental health game. That means getting into some individual therapy to address your skills gap. It means valuing your own internal world and respecting your ideas enough to communicate them effectively. It means seeing intimacy, romance, and emotional connection as worthy of your time and effort.

Ultimately, we have an opportunity to revolutionize romantic relationships and establish new, healthier norms starting with the first date. It’s likely that some of these romances will be transformative and healing, disrupting generational trauma and establishing a fresh culture of admiration and validation.

Men have a key role in this transformation but only if they go all-in. It’s going to take that kind of commitment to themselves, to their mental health, and to the kind of love they want to generate in the world. Will we step up?

 

[Betrayed]

Why is it always foids doing these shitty articles did they fire all the actual single men because they're not Jewish or what

 

[Sexless incel]

Feminism is the reason for all problems that men have to face nowadays

 

[InMemoriam]

Why is it always foids doing these shitty articles did they fire all the actual single men because they're not Jewish or what

the only thing said to be true is the shift in women standards they had to fuck it up by citing emotional connection

 

[Fallenleaves]

Shits too long no one will read it

 

[EnterTheVoid]

Didnt read that useless shit. Answer is always foids.

 

[HomicidalSuicidal88]

Fucking foids cause men to be lonely

 

[Izayacel]

Feminism is the reason for all problems that men have to face nowadays

 

[Simulacrasimulation]

What's Behind the Rise of Lonely, Single Men

Men need to address their deficits to meet healthier relationship expectations.

www.psychologytoday.com

What's Behind the Rise of Lonely, Single Men
Men need to address their deficits to meet healthier relationship expectations.

Posted August 9, 2022

Reviewed by Hara Estroff Marano

Here are three broad trends in the relationship landscape that suggest heterosexual men are in for a rough road ahead:

Dating Apps. Whether you’re just starting to date or you’re recently divorced and dating again, dating apps are a huge driver of new romantic connections in the United States. The only problem is that upwards of 62% of users are men and many women are overwhelmed by the number of options they have.

Competition in online dating is fierce, and lucky in-person chance encounters with dreamy partners are rarer than ever.

Relationship Standards. With so many options, it’s not surprising that women are increasingly selective.

I do a live TikTok show (@abetterloveproject) and speak with hundreds of audience members every week; I hear recurring dating themes from women between the ages of 25 and 45: They prefer men who are emotionally available, who are good communicators, and who share their values.

Skills Deficits. For men, this means a relationship skills gap that, if not addressed, will likely lead to fewer dating opportunities and longer periods of being single. There's less patience for poor communication skills today.

The problem for men is that emotional connection is the lifeblood of healthy, long-term love and it requires all the skills that families still are not consistently teaching young boys.

While there’s probably no chance of stemming the rising tide of unintentional single men, there is some good news.

The algorithms are becoming increasingly more complex on dating apps and other online platforms. One result is that great matches are on the rise. One dating app, Hinge, found through beta trials that 90% of users rated their first date positively, with 72% indicating that they wanted a second date.

How can men reap the benefit of the algorithms? Level up your mental health game. That means getting into some individual therapy to address your skills gap. It means valuing your own internal world and respecting your ideas enough to communicate them effectively. It means seeing intimacy, romance, and emotional connection as worthy of your time and effort.

Ultimately, we have an opportunity to revolutionize romantic relationships and establish new, healthier norms starting with the first date. It’s likely that some of these romances will be transformative and healing, disrupting generational trauma and establishing a fresh culture of admiration and validation.

Men have a key role in this transformation but only if they go all-in. It’s going to take that kind of commitment to themselves, to their mental health, and to the kind of love they want to generate in the world. Will we step up?

"it’s not surprising that women are increasingly selective."

this line alone is PATHETIC

This implies women just because they have more choice AUTOMATICALLY BECOME MORE SELECTIVE (GREEDY FOR THE BEST), LIKE THEY HAVE NO CONTROL OVER THEIR OWN GREED AND MIND, ABSOLVING THEM FROM ALL MANNER OR MORAL DILEMMAS, THAT THE INCREASINGLY SELECTIVE BEHAVIOUR IS NOT MORALLY SOUND.

Even if there is more to choose from why is it a straight line that women purely go to being the MOST SELECTIVE, THE MOST HYPERGAMOUS, EG INCREASING THEIR STANDARDS THE MORE THERE IS TO CHOOSE FROM. If you are moral IT DOESNT MATTER HOW MUCH OF WHAT THE ENVIRONMENT IS OFFERING YOU CHOSE BASED ON WHAT IS MORALLY CORRECT, THE AMOUNT ON OFFER SIMPLY DOESNT MATTER.

EXAMPLE THAT COMPLETELY NUKES THIS ANGLE
If someone wants to lose weight and be healthy, IT DOESNT MATTER HOW MANY CAKES ARE SURROUNDING THEM AND PUSHED IN THEIR FACE, AND FLASHED ON SCREENS AND TV'S AND MAGAZINES. AS THE PERSON BEING "HEALTHY" KNOWS THEY CANT HAVE ALL THESE CAKES NO MATTER HOW MANY CAKES AND THE VARIETY AND QUALITY OF CAKE, BECAUSE THEY KNOW CERTAIN FOODS LIKE CAKES ARE TOXIC AND WILL MAKE THEM FAT AND ARE NOT IN LINE WITH THEIR LIFESTYLE.

SAME DIFFERENCE DOUCHEBAGS: most "top men" are literally toxic and are misogynistic and beat and use women and are emotionally unavailable etc etc etc, the womens standards are ALL SUPERFICIAL, LOOKS, HEIGHT, MONEY, STATUS ON THESE APPS AND NOW IN REAL LIFE INCREASINGLY.
If women were applying this MUH PERSONAILTY MUH MORALS MUH MENTAL HEALTH, WHY DOES EVERY MAN THEY PICK FIT THIS NARROW CRITERIA OF SUPERFICIAL, LOOKS, HEIGHT, MONEY, STATUS.

SO BY DEFINITION THEY ARE STATING ONLY THESE TOP MEN ALSO HAVE THE TRAITS THEY REEL OFF OF MUH MENTAL HEALTH, MORALITY, CARING, WHILE THE OTHER 70% OF MEN SUDDENLY DONT HAVE THEM, HOW THE FUCK AM I TO BELIEVE THIS SHIT, ITS STATISTICALLY IMPOSSIBLE FOR ALL OF THE 70% OF MEN TO NOT HAVE THESE TRAITS.

MEANWHILE THE MALES WHO ARE IN THE TOP 20-30% OF SUPERFICIAL LOOKS, HEIGHT, MONEY, STATUS.POPULATION, SOMEHOW ARE ALSO THE ONLY GROUP OF MEN THAT POSSESS THE DESIRED TRAITS MENTAL HEALTH, MORALITY, CARING, WITH MEN IN THE BOTTOM 70% NOT POSSESSING THESE TRAITS.

THIS IS STATISTICALLY IMPOSSIBLE, ONE GROUP IN A SPECIFIC AREA EG TALL MEN HAVING SOMEHOW A MONOPOLY ON SOMETHING AS SPECIFIC AND RANDOM AS EMPATHY OR PERSONALITY IS STATISTICALLY UNBELIEVABLY UNLIKELY, AS THERE IS NO MECHANISM FOR THIS % OF THE POPULATION TO DEVELOP EMPATHY OVER EVERYONE WHY DO WOULD THEY HAVE A MONOPOLY ON EMPATHY.


FURTHERMORE THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO DATA OUTSIDE OF THE DATING SPHERE SUPPORTING THIS TOP 20% CONTAIN ALL OF THE VIRTUE SIGNALLING TRAITS MUH PERSONAILTY MUH MORALS MUH MENTAL HEALTH, IF THERE WAS DATA IT WOULD BE ALL OVER THE NEWS THAT TALL GOOD LOOKING PEOPLE ARE MORE EMPATHETIC MORE SAVES MORE LIVES, DOES MORE GOOD DEEDS, ETC ETC ETC ETC.

IF IT WAS THIS UNEQUALLY DISTRIBUTED SOCIETY WOULD BE STACKED IN CHARITIES ETC WITH PURELY TOP 20% MEN, RUNNING AROUND SAVING THE WORLD BECAUSE OF THIER MUH MUH PERSONAILTY MUH MORALS MUH MENTAL HEALTH.

ITS ABSOLUTE SHITE

THIS IS BOTH RETARDED STATISTICALLY AND MORALLY ABSOLUTE DOGSHIT LOGIC AND IS BENT TO ALLOW THEM TO CHOSE THE TOP 20% WHILE STILL RETAINING A MORAL HALO, ABSOLUTE SHIT.

 

[InMemoriam]

"it’s not surprising that women are increasingly selective."

this line alone is PATHETIC

This implies women just because they have more choice AUTOMATICALLY BECOME MORE SELECTIVE (GREEDY FOR THE BEST), LIKE THEY HAVE NO CONTROL OVER THEIR OWN GREED AND MIND, ABSOLVING THEM FROM ALL MANNER OR MORAL DILEMMAS, THAT THE INCREASINGLY SELECTIVE BEHAVIOUR IS NOT MORALLY SOUND.

Even if there is more to choose from why is it a straight line that women purely go to being the MOST SELECTIVE, THE MOST HYPERGAMOUS, EG INCREASING THEIR STANDARDS THE MORE THERE IS TO CHOOSE FROM. If you are moral IT DOESNT MATTER HOW MUCH OF WHAT THE ENVIRONMENT IS OFFERING YOU CHOSE BASED ON WHAT IS MORALLY CORRECT, THE AMOUNT ON OFFER SIMPLY DOESNT MATTER.

EXAMPLE THAT COMPLETELY NUKES THIS ANGLE
If someone wants to lose weight and be healthy, IT DOESNT MATTER HOW MANY CAKES ARE SURROUNDING THEM AND PUSHED IN THEIR FACE, AND FLASHED ON SCREENS AND TV'S AND MAGAZINES. AS THE PERSON BEING "HEALTHY" KNOWS THEY CANT HAVE ALL THESE CAKES NO MATTER HOW MANY CAKES AND THE VARIETY AND QUALITY OF CAKE, BECAUSE THEY KNOW CERTAIN FOODS LIKE CAKES ARE TOXIC AND WILL MAKE THEM FAT AND ARE NOT IN LINE WITH THEIR LIFESTYLE.

SAME DIFFERENCE DOUCHEBAGS: most "top men" are literally toxic and are misogynistic and beat and use women and are emotionally unavailable etc etc etc, the womens standards are ALL SUPERFICIAL, LOOKS, HEIGHT, MONEY, STATUS ON THESE APPS AND NOW IN REAL LIFE INCREASINGLY.
If women were applying this MUH PERSONAILTY MUH MORALS MUH MENTAL HEALTH, WHY DOES EVERY MAN THEY PICK FIT THIS NARROW CRITERIA OF SUPERFICIAL, LOOKS, HEIGHT, MONEY, STATUS.

SO BY DEFINITION THEY ARE STATING ONLY THESE TOP MEN ALSO HAVE THE TRAITS THEY REEL OFF OF MUH MENTAL HEALTH, MORALITY, CARING, WHILE THE OTHER 70% OF MEN SUDDENLY DONT HAVE THEM, HOW THE FUCK AM I TO BELIEVE THIS SHIT, ITS STATISTICALLY IMPOSSIBLE FOR ALL OF THE 70% OF MEN TO NOT HAVE THESE TRAITS.

MEANWHILE THE MALES WHO ARE IN THE TOP 20-30% OF SUPERFICIAL LOOKS, HEIGHT, MONEY, STATUS.POPULATION, SOMEHOW ARE ALSO THE ONLY GROUP OF MEN THAT POSSESS THE DESIRED TRAITS MENTAL HEALTH, MORALITY, CARING, WITH MEN IN THE BOTTOM 70% NOT POSSESSING THESE TRAITS.

THIS IS STATISTICALLY IMPOSSIBLE, ONE GROUP IN A SPECIFIC AREA EG TALL MEN HAVING SOMEHOW A MONOPOLY ON SOMETHING AS SPECIFIC AND RANDOM AS EMPATHY OR PERSONALITY IS STATISTICALLY UNBELIEVABLY UNLIKELY, AS THERE IS NO MECHANISM FOR THIS % OF THE POPULATION TO DEVELOP EMPATHY OVER EVERYONE WHY DO WOULD THEY HAVE A MONOPOLY ON EMPATHY.


FURTHERMORE THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO DATA OUTSIDE OF THE DATING SPHERE SUPPORTING THIS TOP 20% CONTAIN ALL OF THE VIRTUE SIGNALLING TRAITS MUH PERSONAILTY MUH MORALS MUH MENTAL HEALTH, IF THERE WAS DATA IT WOULD BE ALL OVER THE NEWS THAT TALL GOOD LOOKING PEOPLE ARE MORE EMPATHETIC MORE SAVES MORE LIVES, DOES MORE GOOD DEEDS, ETC ETC ETC ETC.

IF IT WAS THIS UNEQUALLY DISTRIBUTED SOCIETY WOULD BE STACKED IN CHARITIES ETC WITH PURELY TOP 20% MEN, RUNNING AROUND SAVING THE WORLD BECAUSE OF THIER MUH MUH PERSONAILTY MUH MORALS MUH MENTAL HEALTH.

ITS ABSOLUTE SHITE

THIS IS BOTH RETARDED STATISTICALLY AND MORALLY ABSOLUTE DOGSHIT LOGIC AND IS BENT TO ALLOW THEM TO CHOSE THE TOP 20% WHILE STILL RETAINING A MORAL HALO, ABSOLUTE SHIT.

ikr their privilege and entitlement is showing

 

[Cope or die]

Feminism is the reason for all problems that men have to face nowadays

"it’s not surprising that women are increasingly selective."

this line alone is PATHETIC

This implies women just because they have more choice AUTOMATICALLY BECOME MORE SELECTIVE (GREEDY FOR THE BEST), LIKE THEY HAVE NO CONTROL OVER THEIR OWN GREED AND MIND, ABSOLVING THEM FROM ALL MANNER OR MORAL DILEMMAS, THAT THE INCREASINGLY SELECTIVE BEHAVIOUR IS NOT MORALLY SOUND.

Even if there is more to choose from why is it a straight line that women purely go to being the MOST SELECTIVE, THE MOST HYPERGAMOUS, EG INCREASING THEIR STANDARDS THE MORE THERE IS TO CHOOSE FROM. If you are moral IT DOESNT MATTER HOW MUCH OF WHAT THE ENVIRONMENT IS OFFERING YOU CHOSE BASED ON WHAT IS MORALLY CORRECT, THE AMOUNT ON OFFER SIMPLY DOESNT MATTER.

EXAMPLE THAT COMPLETELY NUKES THIS ANGLE
If someone wants to lose weight and be healthy, IT DOESNT MATTER HOW MANY CAKES ARE SURROUNDING THEM AND PUSHED IN THEIR FACE, AND FLASHED ON SCREENS AND TV'S AND MAGAZINES. AS THE PERSON BEING "HEALTHY" KNOWS THEY CANT HAVE ALL THESE CAKES NO MATTER HOW MANY CAKES AND THE VARIETY AND QUALITY OF CAKE, BECAUSE THEY KNOW CERTAIN FOODS LIKE CAKES ARE TOXIC AND WILL MAKE THEM FAT AND ARE NOT IN LINE WITH THEIR LIFESTYLE.

SAME DIFFERENCE DOUCHEBAGS: most "top men" are literally toxic and are misogynistic and beat and use women and are emotionally unavailable etc etc etc, the womens standards are ALL SUPERFICIAL, LOOKS, HEIGHT, MONEY, STATUS ON THESE APPS AND NOW IN REAL LIFE INCREASINGLY.
If women were applying this MUH PERSONAILTY MUH MORALS MUH MENTAL HEALTH, WHY DOES EVERY MAN THEY PICK FIT THIS NARROW CRITERIA OF SUPERFICIAL, LOOKS, HEIGHT, MONEY, STATUS.

SO BY DEFINITION THEY ARE STATING ONLY THESE TOP MEN ALSO HAVE THE TRAITS THEY REEL OFF OF MUH MENTAL HEALTH, MORALITY, CARING, WHILE THE OTHER 70% OF MEN SUDDENLY DONT HAVE THEM, HOW THE FUCK AM I TO BELIEVE THIS SHIT, ITS STATISTICALLY IMPOSSIBLE FOR ALL OF THE 70% OF MEN TO NOT HAVE THESE TRAITS.

MEANWHILE THE MALES WHO ARE IN THE TOP 20-30% OF SUPERFICIAL LOOKS, HEIGHT, MONEY, STATUS.POPULATION, SOMEHOW ARE ALSO THE ONLY GROUP OF MEN THAT POSSESS THE DESIRED TRAITS MENTAL HEALTH, MORALITY, CARING, WITH MEN IN THE BOTTOM 70% NOT POSSESSING THESE TRAITS.

THIS IS STATISTICALLY IMPOSSIBLE, ONE GROUP IN A SPECIFIC AREA EG TALL MEN HAVING SOMEHOW A MONOPOLY ON SOMETHING AS SPECIFIC AND RANDOM AS EMPATHY OR PERSONALITY IS STATISTICALLY UNBELIEVABLY UNLIKELY, AS THERE IS NO MECHANISM FOR THIS % OF THE POPULATION TO DEVELOP EMPATHY OVER EVERYONE WHY DO WOULD THEY HAVE A MONOPOLY ON EMPATHY.


FURTHERMORE THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO DATA OUTSIDE OF THE DATING SPHERE SUPPORTING THIS TOP 20% CONTAIN ALL OF THE VIRTUE SIGNALLING TRAITS MUH PERSONAILTY MUH MORALS MUH MENTAL HEALTH, IF THERE WAS DATA IT WOULD BE ALL OVER THE NEWS THAT TALL GOOD LOOKING PEOPLE ARE MORE EMPATHETIC MORE SAVES MORE LIVES, DOES MORE GOOD DEEDS, ETC ETC ETC ETC.

IF IT WAS THIS UNEQUALLY DISTRIBUTED SOCIETY WOULD BE STACKED IN CHARITIES ETC WITH PURELY TOP 20% MEN, RUNNING AROUND SAVING THE WORLD BECAUSE OF THIER MUH MUH PERSONAILTY MUH MORALS MUH MENTAL HEALTH.

ITS ABSOLUTE SHITE

THIS IS BOTH RETARDED STATISTICALLY AND MORALLY ABSOLUTE DOGSHIT LOGIC AND IS BENT TO ALLOW THEM TO CHOSE THE TOP 20% WHILE STILL RETAINING A MORAL HALO, ABSOLUTE SHIT.

 

[based_meme]

The socially desirable and acceptable (diplomatic) statement:

They prefer men who are emotionally available, who are good communicators, and who share their values.

The truth:

They prefer men who are tall, good looking, fit, and have high paying careers or are wealthy businessmen.

"it’s not surprising that women are increasingly selective."

this line alone is PATHETIC

This implies women just because they have more choice AUTOMATICALLY BECOME MORE SELECTIVE (GREEDY FOR THE BEST), LIKE THEY HAVE NO CONTROL OVER THEIR OWN GREED AND MIND, ABSOLVING THEM FROM ALL MANNER OR MORAL DILEMMAS, THAT THE INCREASINGLY SELECTIVE BEHAVIOUR IS NOT MORALLY SOUND.

Even if there is more to choose from why is it a straight line that women purely go to being the MOST SELECTIVE, THE MOST HYPERGAMOUS, EG INCREASING THEIR STANDARDS THE MORE THERE IS TO CHOOSE FROM. If you are moral IT DOESNT MATTER HOW MUCH OF WHAT THE ENVIRONMENT IS OFFERING YOU CHOSE BASED ON WHAT IS MORALLY CORRECT, THE AMOUNT ON OFFER SIMPLY DOESNT MATTER.

EXAMPLE THAT COMPLETELY NUKES THIS ANGLE
If someone wants to lose weight and be healthy, IT DOESNT MATTER HOW MANY CAKES ARE SURROUNDING THEM AND PUSHED IN THEIR FACE, AND FLASHED ON SCREENS AND TV'S AND MAGAZINES. AS THE PERSON BEING "HEALTHY" KNOWS THEY CANT HAVE ALL THESE CAKES NO MATTER HOW MANY CAKES AND THE VARIETY AND QUALITY OF CAKE, BECAUSE THEY KNOW CERTAIN FOODS LIKE CAKES ARE TOXIC AND WILL MAKE THEM FAT AND ARE NOT IN LINE WITH THEIR LIFESTYLE.

SAME DIFFERENCE DOUCHEBAGS: most "top men" are literally toxic and are misogynistic and beat and use women and are emotionally unavailable etc etc etc, the womens standards are ALL SUPERFICIAL, LOOKS, HEIGHT, MONEY, STATUS ON THESE APPS AND NOW IN REAL LIFE INCREASINGLY.
If women were applying this MUH PERSONAILTY MUH MORALS MUH MENTAL HEALTH, WHY DOES EVERY MAN THEY PICK FIT THIS NARROW CRITERIA OF SUPERFICIAL, LOOKS, HEIGHT, MONEY, STATUS.

SO BY DEFINITION THEY ARE STATING ONLY THESE TOP MEN ALSO HAVE THE TRAITS THEY REEL OFF OF MUH MENTAL HEALTH, MORALITY, CARING, WHILE THE OTHER 70% OF MEN SUDDENLY DONT HAVE THEM, HOW THE FUCK AM I TO BELIEVE THIS SHIT, ITS STATISTICALLY IMPOSSIBLE FOR ALL OF THE 70% OF MEN TO NOT HAVE THESE TRAITS.

MEANWHILE THE MALES WHO ARE IN THE TOP 20-30% OF SUPERFICIAL LOOKS, HEIGHT, MONEY, STATUS.POPULATION, SOMEHOW ARE ALSO THE ONLY GROUP OF MEN THAT POSSESS THE DESIRED TRAITS MENTAL HEALTH, MORALITY, CARING, WITH MEN IN THE BOTTOM 70% NOT POSSESSING THESE TRAITS.

THIS IS STATISTICALLY IMPOSSIBLE, ONE GROUP IN A SPECIFIC AREA EG TALL MEN HAVING SOMEHOW A MONOPOLY ON SOMETHING AS SPECIFIC AND RANDOM AS EMPATHY OR PERSONALITY IS STATISTICALLY UNBELIEVABLY UNLIKELY, AS THERE IS NO MECHANISM FOR THIS % OF THE POPULATION TO DEVELOP EMPATHY OVER EVERYONE WHY DO WOULD THEY HAVE A MONOPOLY ON EMPATHY.


FURTHERMORE THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO DATA OUTSIDE OF THE DATING SPHERE SUPPORTING THIS TOP 20% CONTAIN ALL OF THE VIRTUE SIGNALLING TRAITS MUH PERSONAILTY MUH MORALS MUH MENTAL HEALTH, IF THERE WAS DATA IT WOULD BE ALL OVER THE NEWS THAT TALL GOOD LOOKING PEOPLE ARE MORE EMPATHETIC MORE SAVES MORE LIVES, DOES MORE GOOD DEEDS, ETC ETC ETC ETC.

IF IT WAS THIS UNEQUALLY DISTRIBUTED SOCIETY WOULD BE STACKED IN CHARITIES ETC WITH PURELY TOP 20% MEN, RUNNING AROUND SAVING THE WORLD BECAUSE OF THIER MUH MUH PERSONAILTY MUH MORALS MUH MENTAL HEALTH.

ITS ABSOLUTE SHITE

THIS IS BOTH RETARDED STATISTICALLY AND MORALLY ABSOLUTE DOGSHIT LOGIC AND IS BENT TO ALLOW THEM TO CHOSE THE TOP 20% WHILE STILL RETAINING A MORAL HALO, ABSOLUTE SHIT.

 

[Pancakecel]

Jesus, what is this shit lol.

Also, psychologytoday

 

[EnterTheVoid]

"it’s not surprising that women are increasingly selective."

this line alone is PATHETIC

This implies women just because they have more choice AUTOMATICALLY BECOME MORE SELECTIVE (GREEDY FOR THE BEST), LIKE THEY HAVE NO CONTROL OVER THEIR OWN GREED AND MIND, ABSOLVING THEM FROM ALL MANNER OR MORAL DILEMMAS, THAT THE INCREASINGLY SELECTIVE BEHAVIOUR IS NOT MORALLY SOUND.

Even if there is more to choose from why is it a straight line that women purely go to being the MOST SELECTIVE, THE MOST HYPERGAMOUS, EG INCREASING THEIR STANDARDS THE MORE THERE IS TO CHOOSE FROM. If you are moral IT DOESNT MATTER HOW MUCH OF WHAT THE ENVIRONMENT IS OFFERING YOU CHOSE BASED ON WHAT IS MORALLY CORRECT, THE AMOUNT ON OFFER SIMPLY DOESNT MATTER.

EXAMPLE THAT COMPLETELY NUKES THIS ANGLE
If someone wants to lose weight and be healthy, IT DOESNT MATTER HOW MANY CAKES ARE SURROUNDING THEM AND PUSHED IN THEIR FACE, AND FLASHED ON SCREENS AND TV'S AND MAGAZINES. AS THE PERSON BEING "HEALTHY" KNOWS THEY CANT HAVE ALL THESE CAKES NO MATTER HOW MANY CAKES AND THE VARIETY AND QUALITY OF CAKE, BECAUSE THEY KNOW CERTAIN FOODS LIKE CAKES ARE TOXIC AND WILL MAKE THEM FAT AND ARE NOT IN LINE WITH THEIR LIFESTYLE.

SAME DIFFERENCE DOUCHEBAGS: most "top men" are literally toxic and are misogynistic and beat and use women and are emotionally unavailable etc etc etc, the womens standards are ALL SUPERFICIAL, LOOKS, HEIGHT, MONEY, STATUS ON THESE APPS AND NOW IN REAL LIFE INCREASINGLY.
If women were applying this MUH PERSONAILTY MUH MORALS MUH MENTAL HEALTH, WHY DOES EVERY MAN THEY PICK FIT THIS NARROW CRITERIA OF SUPERFICIAL, LOOKS, HEIGHT, MONEY, STATUS.

SO BY DEFINITION THEY ARE STATING ONLY THESE TOP MEN ALSO HAVE THE TRAITS THEY REEL OFF OF MUH MENTAL HEALTH, MORALITY, CARING, WHILE THE OTHER 70% OF MEN SUDDENLY DONT HAVE THEM, HOW THE FUCK AM I TO BELIEVE THIS SHIT, ITS STATISTICALLY IMPOSSIBLE FOR ALL OF THE 70% OF MEN TO NOT HAVE THESE TRAITS.

MEANWHILE THE MALES WHO ARE IN THE TOP 20-30% OF SUPERFICIAL LOOKS, HEIGHT, MONEY, STATUS.POPULATION, SOMEHOW ARE ALSO THE ONLY GROUP OF MEN THAT POSSESS THE DESIRED TRAITS MENTAL HEALTH, MORALITY, CARING, WITH MEN IN THE BOTTOM 70% NOT POSSESSING THESE TRAITS.

THIS IS STATISTICALLY IMPOSSIBLE, ONE GROUP IN A SPECIFIC AREA EG TALL MEN HAVING SOMEHOW A MONOPOLY ON SOMETHING AS SPECIFIC AND RANDOM AS EMPATHY OR PERSONALITY IS STATISTICALLY UNBELIEVABLY UNLIKELY, AS THERE IS NO MECHANISM FOR THIS % OF THE POPULATION TO DEVELOP EMPATHY OVER EVERYONE WHY DO WOULD THEY HAVE A MONOPOLY ON EMPATHY.


FURTHERMORE THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO DATA OUTSIDE OF THE DATING SPHERE SUPPORTING THIS TOP 20% CONTAIN ALL OF THE VIRTUE SIGNALLING TRAITS MUH PERSONAILTY MUH MORALS MUH MENTAL HEALTH, IF THERE WAS DATA IT WOULD BE ALL OVER THE NEWS THAT TALL GOOD LOOKING PEOPLE ARE MORE EMPATHETIC MORE SAVES MORE LIVES, DOES MORE GOOD DEEDS, ETC ETC ETC ETC.

IF IT WAS THIS UNEQUALLY DISTRIBUTED SOCIETY WOULD BE STACKED IN CHARITIES ETC WITH PURELY TOP 20% MEN, RUNNING AROUND SAVING THE WORLD BECAUSE OF THIER MUH MUH PERSONAILTY MUH MORALS MUH MENTAL HEALTH.

ITS ABSOLUTE SHITE

THIS IS BOTH RETARDED STATISTICALLY AND MORALLY ABSOLUTE DOGSHIT LOGIC AND IS BENT TO ALLOW THEM TO CHOSE THE TOP 20% WHILE STILL RETAINING A MORAL HALO, ABSOLUTE SHIT.

Didnt read your post but I feel all those CAPS were absolutely appropriate and necessary considering the subject matter. Those foids need punishment.

 

[lifefuel]

These articles are always going to go in one of two directions.

A) Blame men (99% of these articles)
B) Acknowledge the blackpill

 

[Izayacel]

Feminism is the reason for all problems that men have to face nowadays

 

[ResidentHell]

psychologytoday

 

[ADHD_cel]

Feminism is the reason for all problems that men have to face nowadays

 

[turbosperg]

How can men reap the benefit of the algorithms? Level up your mental health game.

It has nothing to do with looks, guys. See? This article right here says it is all about personality.

 

[InMemoriam]

It has nothing to do with looks, guys. See? This article right here says it is all about personality.

personaliteehee is evERything mang!

 

[Knight of the Cymry]

Unchecked hypergamy, which stems from feminist ideology.

 

[IncelKing]

personaliteehee is evERything mang!

I need to get a bettER pERsonality

 

[SadRedhead29]

Feminism is being weaponized by Hollywood now

 

[war_with_myself]

 

[CrackingYs]

I don't see any solutions here like revoking womens rights, and forcing them into monogamous sexual relationships and marriage.

 

[Intellau_Celistic]

I don't see any solutions here like revoking womens rights, and forcing them into monogamous sexual relationships and marriage.

 

[mlcurrycel]

I don't see any solutions here like revoking womens rights, and forcing them into monogamous sexual relationships and marriage.

Therapists are shilling therapy instead of advising something concrete like what you did. We need enforced monogamy now!

 

[blackraven]

Shits too long no one will read it

 

[1337hikki]

Jesus, what is this shit lol.

Also, psychologytoday

The male cuckold therapist who wrote this is just one of many

 

[Defetivecuckachu]

Men have a key role in this transformation but only if they go all-in. It’s going to take that kind of commitment to themselves, to their mental health, and to the kind of love they want to generate in the world. Will we step up?

go all-in and transform yourself into Chad. It's going to take that kind of commitment. Will we step up?