Seahorsecel
Self-banned
-
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2023
- Posts
- 5,095
Let's say you were transported 85 years ago to 1939. You are Hitler's right-hand man and he'll listen to (almost) everything you have to say. What would you do differently?
Kill him and seize power and turn to communismLet's say you were transported 85 years ago to 1939. You are Hitler's right-hand man and he'll listen to (almost) everything you have to say. What would you do differently?
Not attack Russia and treat British and french PWOs as humanly as possible to gain their sympathy. When Russia invades, I call the Brits to help us and defeat Communism.Let's say you were transported 85 years ago to 1939. You are Hitler's right-hand man and he'll listen to (almost) everything you have to say. What would you do differently?
He already did that. He tried to avoid war with Britain and France for as long as possible and tried making treaties with Britain that they rejected. Britain and France declared war with Germany.Not attack Russia and treat British and french PWOs as humanly as possible to gain their sympathy. When Russia invades, I call the Brits to help us and defeat Communism.
Yep. People don't understand this basic fact. JFL Hitler did everything he could to secure peace; the problem was when it came to waging war. He should have developed long-range bombers to firebomb London and Britain into submission.He already did that. He tried to avoid war with Britain and France for as long as possible and tried making treaties with Britain that they rejected. Britain and France declared war with Germany.
Wrong. Danzing massacre had to be avenged. 5,000 innocent Germans murdered couldn't go unanswered. Poland deserved what it got.Avoid invading Poland.
RightYep. People don't understand this basic fact. JFL Hitler did everything he could to secure peace; the problem was when it came to waging war. He should have developed long-range bombers to firebomb London and Britain into submission.
Also, sparing the British at Dunkirk was an obvious mistake.
Unfortunately invading Poland also meant war with Britain. That's the problem.Wrong. Danzing massacre had to be avenged. 5,000 innocent Germans murdered couldn't go unanswered. Poland deserved what it got.
Yes, but if Hitler doesn't spare the 300,000 British soldiers at Dunkirk and either captures or kills them, then the British have no choice but to surrender. And even if they don't, they don't have enough troops to be a major threat. Just focus all resources on the Eastern Front with the Soviet Union and control Mussolini on a short leash to prevent his dumbass attack on Greece, which cost precious time and resources.Unfortunately invading Poland also meant war with Britain. That's the problem.
Based. It's a shame Adolf Hitler took so much pity on the British.Yes, but if Hitler doesn't spare the 300,000 British soldiers at Dunkirk and either captures or kills them, then the British have no choice but to surrender. And even if they don't, they don't have enough troops to be a major threat. Just focus all resources on the Eastern Front with the Soviet Union and control Mussolini on a short leash to prevent his dumbass attack on Greece, which cost precious time and resources.
Take Moscow, Stalingrad, and Leningrad, and the war is practically one. Sure, they have their factories over the Ural mountains, but so what?
Build heavy defense lines and wear the enemy out as they infight due to all the political and social unrest caused by all the defeats and deaths, with Stalin either being killed or captured during the Battle of Moscow.
The war will be won shortly as a peace agreement is made with the surviving Soviet government or whatever comes afterward; America is never able to enter the war in any significant capacity, and Imperial Japan can deal with them anyway. Germany takes new lands from Poland to provide new living space for its growing population on top of African territory for resources. They grow their military and become practically invincible on the land. Germany will be secure for the next one hundred years—the end.
Yep. He should have realized that he was the elected German Chancellor, not the Chancellor of Europe or the white race; he should have focused all his efforts on the German people and the German people alone.Based. It's a shame Adolf Hitler took so much pity on the British.
Shame.Yep. He should have realized that he was the elected German Chancellor, not the Chancellor of Europe or the white race; he should have focused all his efforts on the German people and the German people alone.
Had he, the world would be very, very different. And for the better. View attachment 1157717 I cry every time I watch this. The world we lost in 1945...
Indeed. Indeed... JFLShame.