Blackpill What will BP lead to in the future?

[Eternatus]

Is what women do just social darwinism, eugenics? Will all deficiencies, health problems (that includes looks as you can comprehend) be stripped away from our DNA to become a taller sharper homogeneous species?

In that sense, if u really think, how could u blame them. It isn’t women, there’s no free will or choice: their limbic system is driven to feed from the most fit, it is some sort of bad reinforcement learning algorithm nature forced on us.

That said, it doesn’t change anything, the problem it’s still caused by their act. But the sad truth is that not either violence or exploitation will ever change anything. Their role is to select, AI and tech development will need an offspring of high IQ hybrid eurasian tall white ectomorphs.

 

[nico]

nukes

 

[Rapemaxxer]

Is what women do just social darwinism, eugenics?

Yep. Blackpill 101: eugenics is only seen as justified when foids do it.

Will all deficiencies, health problems (that includes looks as you can comprehend) be stripped away from our DNA to become a taller sharper homogeneous species?

No because sub2-sub3 5'1'' foids still get to procreate with tallfag chads. Hence incels keep getting spawned by single moms who got pumped and dumped by chad in the past.

In that sense, if u really think, how could u blame them. It isn’t women, there’s no free will or choice: their limbic system is driven to feed from the most fit, it is some sort of bad reinforcement learning algorithm nature forced on us.

Completely disagree. It is only rational to blame women for being chad-only whores. In the past, we had traditions restraining these sluts but the fucking retarded boomers destroyed it all with their sexual revolution. Foids are not animals, they CAN think but they choose not to because why bother settling with a gentle sub5 when you get pumped and dumped by dark triad tyrone? Sluts prioritize pleasure over rationale, and if they get shamed for it, they deserve it. It's a far better fate than the one I would have chosen for them if I were given a choice.

 

[Eternatus]

Completely disagree. It is only rational to blame women for being chad-only whores. In the past, we had traditions restraining these sluts but the fucking retarded boomers destroyed it all with their sexual revolution. Foids are not animals, they CAN think but they choose not to because why bother settling with a gentle sub5 when you get pumped and dumped by dark triad tyrone? Sluts prioritize pleasure over rationale, and if they get shamed for it, they deserve it. It's a far better fate than the one I had chosen for them if I were given a choice.

I get it, really. But you are focusing on the collateral effects. Why does this deep down happen and I want to know if there’s a long term solution to fix it. I highly support AI dolls development, we might live up to the phase before they rebel so save your nuts.

But thing is, demographics is a serious thing for a society, it defines countries. Adolf Hitler himself was blackpilled and wanted women to carry healty good looking tall blonde germans as a contribute to the Nazi regime. It was real life Viltrum. I don’t understand how we aren’t counterbalanced properly, how the old 80 20 got inflationated to 95 5. Why we still have so many asymmetries, defects, after ages?

 

[Rapemaxxer]

I want to know if there’s a long term solution to fix it.

There is none. You can't fix evolution. Foids are genetically programmed to be whores. That is why they need to be controlled.

 

[Animecel2D]

The end of the world

 

[gluttony]

Death

 

[Shay Patrick Cormac]

There will always be incels, the standard only gets higher (6'2 becomes the minimum, etc), there will never be a perfect Chad species because of foid hypergamy

 

[AsiaCel]

Indirectly. What's more relevant is demographic blackpill

Society decline is inevitable because birth rate and climate(nobody is talking about this??)

I found that not enough people are talking about the lowering birth rate of developed countries. It will cause a inevitable, whether you fantasize about it or not, mass crisis of immigration due to refusal of native young people to work low paying jobs, and conservative boomers (who meshes very...

incels.is

 

[aspergillus_rotter]

Yep. Blackpill 101: eugenics is only seen as justified when foids do it.



No because sub2-sub3 5'1'' foids still get to procreate with tallfag chads. Hence incels keep getting spawned by single moms who got pumped and dumped by chad in the past.



Completely disagree. It is only rational to blame women for being chad-only whores. In the past, we had traditions restraining these sluts but the fucking retarded boomers destroyed it all with their sexual revolution. Foids are not animals, they CAN think but they choose not to because why bother settling with a gentle sub5 when you get pumped and dumped by dark triad tyrone? Sluts prioritize pleasure over rationale, and if they get shamed for it, they deserve it. It's a far better fate than the one I would have chosen for them if I were given a choice.

Yep you are right eugenics are not hypergamy, they might sound similar but sub5 foids will keep on passing down sub5 genes to produce subhumans, unchecked hypergamy is nevER gonna amount to anything good

 

[Homegrownman326]

Is what women do just social darwinism, eugenics? Will all deficiencies, health problems (that includes looks as you can comprehend) be stripped away from our DNA to become a taller sharper homogeneous species?

In that sense, if u really think, how could u blame them. It isn’t women, there’s no free will or choice: their limbic system is driven to feed from the most fit, it is some sort of bad reinforcement learning algorithm nature forced on us.

That said, it doesn’t change anything, the problem it’s still caused by their act. But the sad truth is that not either violence or exploitation will ever change anything. Their role is to select, AI and tech development will need an offspring of high IQ hybrid eurasian tall white ectomorphs.

Imagine believing that female sexual selection is inherently aligned with what's best from an evolutionary standpoint regarding survival and being "blackpilled". Take the human phallus, for example, there's zero survival advantage to having such a large exposed sex organ and larger penises increase the chances of damage which could prevent reproduction and survival (infection). The only reason we have such large penises as a species is female sexual selection which, in this case, isn't inherently aligned with what's best regarding survival. Our other primate cousins tend to have smaller phallus sizes than we do. Could males with bigger sizes historically also have had other favorable mutations compared to other traits, or was big equals better something that evolved prior? Whatever you think, my point still stands. Sexual selection tends to align with what's good for survival, but not always, and it has an agenda of its own, which could be counterintuitive in some cases. A male peacock's cumbersome tail is bad for survival but appealing to females; there are many cases of this in nature. Females aren't perfect eugenicists by any means.

 

[Eternatus]

Imagine believing that female sexual selection is inherently aligned with what's best from an evolutionary standpoint regarding survival and being "blackpilled". Take the human phallus, for example, there's zero survival advantage to having such a large exposed sex organ and larger penises increase the chances of damage which could prevent reproduction and survival (infection). The only reason we have such large penises as a species is female sexual selection which, in this case, isn't inherently aligned with what's best regarding survival. Our other primate cousins tend to have smaller phallus sizes than we do. Could males with bigger sizes historically also have had other favorable mutations compared to other traits, or was big equals better something that evolved prior? Whatever you think, my point still stands. Sexual selection tends to align with what's good for survival, but not always, and it has an agenda of its own, which could be counterintuitive in some cases. A male peacock's cumbersome tail is bad for survival but appealing to females; there are many cases of this in nature. Females aren't perfect eugenicists by any means.

So what’s really the catch behind it? What does trigger reward system response when evaluating the “better” specimen? There’s gotta be a logic. I don’t know if there’s God’s hand behind this, but God is absolute rationality. At least from my point of view.

There’s an absolute balance in things in the entropy that we are too tired and lost to see. There’s gotta be an explanation, everything is a bell curve, a normal distribution.

We may have been condemned from the start but for it we must find a meaning. Our existence cannot be vain because of a flesh bone configuration calculated wrongly.

 

[Homegrownman326]

So what’s really the catch behind it? What does trigger reward system response when evaluating the “better” specimen? There’s gotta be a logic. I don’t know if there’s God’s hand behind this, but God is absolute rationality. At least from my point of view.

There’s an absolute balance in things in the entropy that we are too tired and lost to see. There’s gotta be an explanation, everything is a bell curve, a normal distribution.

We may have been condemned from the start but for it we must find a meaning. Our existence cannot be vain because of a flesh bone configuration calculated wrongly.

You seem to have a very Idealistic view of the world and believe in God, as an incel I'd expect you to know better but apparently not. This is hard to accept for the vast majority of people, especially when it's understood on a deep intellectual level, but there's no order to the universe or life on earth; it's pure chance, and there's no intelligent design or creator. The closest thing to order is natural selection, but that's defined by random mutation, not only survival. For every positive mutation, there are plenty of negative ones, and plenty of suffering for those individuals affected. Most of female sexual selection is "big is better" and health markers. The peacock's tail feathers are examples of both those things; if they've grown and are intact, then it's a sign of health and survival. These drives of female sexual selection, however, very much override survival if conditions are good, and can create conditions where species go extinct. Take, for instance, a hypothetical species of groundhog, due to torrential rains in their habitat, more food grows and survival is easier, the population grows, but females sexually select larger mates, the size of the species grows, causing them to require more food, but then a drought hits and the population starts starving enmass and due to their requirement for more food die off faster than they otherwise would have. The rational thing to do is not to inflate the size of the species in case food supplies are cut, but that's not how nature works, precisely because it isn't rational.

 

[Eternatus]

You seem to have a very Idealistic view of the world and believe in God, as an incel I'd expect you to know better but apparently not. This is hard to accept for the vast majority of people, especially when it's understood on a deep intellectual level, but there's no order to the universe or life on earth; it's pure chance, and there's no intelligent design or creator. The closest thing to order is natural selection, but that's defined by random mutation, not only survival. For every positive mutation, there are plenty of negative ones, and plenty of suffering for those individuals affected. Most of female sexual selection is "big is better" and health markers. The peacock's tail feathers are examples of both those things; if they've grown and are intact, then it's a sign of health and survival. These drives of female sexual selection, however, very much override survival if conditions are good, and can create conditions where species go extinct. Take, for instance, a hypothetical species of groundhog, due to torrential rains in their habitat, more food grows and survival is easier, the population grows, but females sexually select larger mates, the size of the species grows, causing them to require more food, but then a drought hits and the population starts starving enmass and due to their requirement for more food die off faster than they otherwise would have. The rational thing to do is not to inflate the size of the species in case food supplies are cut, but that's not how nature works, precisely because it isn't rational.

I defined myself atheist for all my life and I started to doubt my point of view 3 years deep in my dead end job. It happens at the point you say to yourself “This is all I ever be”. I don’t care that talking about God makes me a moron, everything that i viewed as idiotic and anti progressive. I’m allin for AI tech Cyberpunk progress quantum computers, all that shit. I still remember tho that my life is a negligible window in the existence and I yearn for Idealisms.

Like my last day on this planet cannot be an average mundane Thursday for me laying in bed after drinking a Redbull and, i dunno, binge scrolling. Reason finding is coded in my ingenuity and I considered looking up when all I had around where self absorbed low iq uninterested unintelligent people that regard me as a sad flesh sack roaming around them.

 

[Eternatus]

You seem to have a very Idealistic view of the world and believe in God, as an incel I'd expect you to know better but apparently not. This is hard to accept for the vast majority of people, especially when it's understood on a deep intellectual level, but there's no order to the universe or life on earth; it's pure chance, and there's no intelligent design or creator. The closest thing to order is natural selection, but that's defined by random mutation, not only survival. For every positive mutation, there are plenty of negative ones, and plenty of suffering for those individuals affected. Most of female sexual selection is "big is better" and health markers. The peacock's tail feathers are examples of both those things; if they've grown and are intact, then it's a sign of health and survival. These drives of female sexual selection, however, very much override survival if conditions are good, and can create conditions where species go extinct. Take, for instance, a hypothetical species of groundhog, due to torrential rains in their habitat, more food grows and survival is easier, the population grows, but females sexually select larger mates, the size of the species grows, causing them to require more food, but then a drought hits and the population starts starving enmass and due to their requirement for more food die off faster than they otherwise would have. The rational thing to do is not to inflate the size of the species in case food supplies are cut, but that's not how nature works, precisely because it isn't rational.

I get your point tho but I cannot give myself anymore room for nihilism. I’m not positive, I’m not happy, I’m in extreme pain. But so a lot of people in this group. Because my face feels like a lipid bloated carcass, because i failed college twice and I board flights for a living, because I’m almost 24 having being only a unachieved gooner, incompetent, lonely, with a severe curvature degree both in the spinal cord and penis, I’m a corroded piece of trash and I must come to terms with it. Still, all of this cannot be unjustified, cannot be just it. If not we wouldn’t be having this convo rn and just roped away.

You too are carrying your body for some greater reward or achievement that you still look up to and our duty is to play in the time we are given.

 

[Homegrownman326]

I defined myself atheist for all my life and I started to doubt my point of view 3 years deep in my dead end job. It happens at the point you say to yourself “This is all I ever be”. I don’t care that talking about God makes me a moron, everything that i viewed as idiotic and anti progressive. I’m allin for AI tech Cyberpunk progress quantum computers, all that shit. I still remember tho that my life is a negligible window in the existence and I yearn for Idealisms.

Like my last day on this planet cannot be an average mundane Thursday for me laying in bed after drinking a Redbull and, i dunno, binge scrolling. Reason finding is coded in my ingenuity and I considered looking up when all I had around where self absorbed low iq uninterested unintelligent people that regard me as a sad flesh sack roaming around them.

I sympathize with your meaning-seeking, but it will remain just that, seeking. God is dead and will remain dead, so long as modernity survives and the knowledge of the universe we now have. "The problem of evil" isn't just a problem; it's a foundational part of life on earth. You cannot believe in a good God when the levels of imperfection and suffering exceed not just death, not just our species, but all manner of organisms alive on this planet. I hate to break it to you, but your last day alive will be a mundane Thursday in a nursing home and you'll be cremated and forgotten in no time at all, haven't having done anything notable with your life aside for working to make money for your boss so they enjoy all the pleasures of life you missed. I've seen this very thing play out a bunch of times in my life. My dad was a drug addict his whole life, and is now a pile of ashes in a vase in the living room. No one, aside from my mom, remembers him or cares about the life he lived. He died a death of despair in a rental home from an overdose, I hope his final moments were peaceful. The point is that you, I, and the rest of them will all die insignificant deaths, and that's it. Normies do view you as you described, and they view me the same, I bear the weight of existence, and I'm salient of it. I wish there was a God, but there isn't. If you really want to die a meaningful death, then do something that makes you proud in your last moments of consciousness; that's up for you to decide what that is.

 

[rebli]

Over.