The previous generations (1850-1960) were able to have all of its people MATED, doesnt matter how ugly you were: as long you were willing to work, not even hard... you were ok. Everyone had a wife, and multiple kids (my grand grand grand parents had 12). Even tho there were no computers, no technology, people were way more happy than today, and never ever alone. You were just too busy (socially) to have any kind of depression, or suicidal thoughts.
Even medically it was better: yeah, you can disagree on this, BUT... I have been sick multiple times, and every time I go to the doctor i come up sicker than before. The only thing that really works are antibiotics (and anesthetics for surgeries), anything else u're just better off treating it naturally (or dying, being dearly loved and missed).
People were way nicer and helpful among themselves. In my city (small town really), there were no prostitutes nor homeless people, so even the "poor" lived a decent life. To have a degraded life, it was just not permitted by that community: you were gonna get helped. There were no suicides. The "rock bottom" was having a not-so-good job (which, btw and by comparison, would be considered a top job today).
It was a boring life, maybe, but the best and most stable you could have. We didnt have all the answers back then, but we were better off it.
Personally, I believe that at some point some people (up in the chain of power) started to notice, and began to grow jelly and envious: only they, the elite, should be able to live that happily. They had to destroy it, putting a higher price on it.
First thing was to isolate people: being so socially connected, it was harder to influence them. That was accomplished by destroying work stability.
Then they had to change the "rock bottom", making it boundless and without fail-safes... in order to terrify people the most. Becoming so scared, people would then become willing to prostituting/slaving themselves both physically and mentally.
And finally, they had to make individuals the weakest possible: that means no guns no weapons.
Idk, what do u think? Am I biased?
Even medically it was better: yeah, you can disagree on this, BUT... I have been sick multiple times, and every time I go to the doctor i come up sicker than before. The only thing that really works are antibiotics (and anesthetics for surgeries), anything else u're just better off treating it naturally (or dying, being dearly loved and missed).
People were way nicer and helpful among themselves. In my city (small town really), there were no prostitutes nor homeless people, so even the "poor" lived a decent life. To have a degraded life, it was just not permitted by that community: you were gonna get helped. There were no suicides. The "rock bottom" was having a not-so-good job (which, btw and by comparison, would be considered a top job today).
It was a boring life, maybe, but the best and most stable you could have. We didnt have all the answers back then, but we were better off it.
Personally, I believe that at some point some people (up in the chain of power) started to notice, and began to grow jelly and envious: only they, the elite, should be able to live that happily. They had to destroy it, putting a higher price on it.
First thing was to isolate people: being so socially connected, it was harder to influence them. That was accomplished by destroying work stability.
Then they had to change the "rock bottom", making it boundless and without fail-safes... in order to terrify people the most. Becoming so scared, people would then become willing to prostituting/slaving themselves both physically and mentally.
And finally, they had to make individuals the weakest possible: that means no guns no weapons.
Idk, what do u think? Am I biased?
Last edited:
