Y
your personality
Self-banned
-
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2020
- Posts
- 28,225
Okay if you can't stand even 1 nonwhite white couple then opposing ethnic males in majority white countries makes sense even in light of the scant few ethnic males that manage to get women.1 nonwhite white couple is too much. Even if you put the Ethnic Male White Female ratio at 1% of total dating, that's still a massive number that is too damn high.
I thought it was more you couldn't even stand one ethnic male existing even if for the most part he was ldaring and not talking to anyone and had no relationships or friends.
Ethnostates are going to be tough to enact with so many mixed race people and the concept of race being diluted and the popularity of interracial fetishes tbhThat's why I support westernized ethnic ethnostates. A based black guy wouldn't be with a gay BLM marxist. He'd be in his own homeland with other based black guys.
In the past there were not so many mixed race people and previous acceptance of it so ethnostates were easier to set up. Now it isn't that easy to implement because not everyone is "pure" like in the past and their is already a precedent set of such people being born out of interracial relationships being the norm and not some strange new thing that can be blamed on subversion.
And a lot of ethnics that are in western anglo countries now would probably be glad to among people of their own race if they knew when going back that they had a reasonable guarantee of being accepted in their ethnic country of origin.
But as it stands right now they don't and they are going to a country where they might be as rejected by the locals as they are in the western countries they live and with an even greater chance of poverty, illness and low living standards.
A lot of the fault with that lies with people in their ethnic countries of origin that are jealous of ethnics that were born in western anglo countries and believe that westernized ethnics arrogantly see themselves as above the locals and not proud of their ethnic country of origin, even though all these westernized ethnics have ever known is living in a western anglo country and are as unfamiliar with the customs of their native ethnic country as white people living in anglo countries.
But what can you do really? You can't control how other people think as much as you might try to convince them. I think it is important to lessen these feelings of animosity between westernized ethnics and ethnics in the native ethnic countries of origin to cut down on this.
If this wasn't so much a problem a lot of westernized ethnic males not satisfied with their lives here would be more likely to move back to their ethnic countries of origin without question if it meant they didn't have to be mogged all the time by people that don't look like them.
But for the reasons stated about people in ethnic countries not accepting westernized ethnics that move back this isn't usually an option.
It is out of self interest that a lot of westernized ethnics do not move back to their ethnic countries of origin but when it is more likely that poverty and a slow painful death and starvation await them and no guarantee of even relating to or being accepted by anyone there can you blame them?
I understand why you'd hate progressive nonwhites for the same reason you'd hate progressive whites.I never said I don't like nonwhites. I mean I hate a majority of them because they vote progressive parties in and are generally obnoxious ungrateful anti white shitheads who ruin the nations they inhabit, but I also hate a lot of white people (Specifically white women) for that same reason. There's based minorities, and I like based minorities, but they need to go and establish their own homeland and live separately. We can respect eachother but live in different countries.
But how can you say minorities are "based" if you want them to go back even if they believe most of everything you do? It doesn't make sense to me tbh
Take the example of curries and rice males. For the most part a lot of them (they non selfhating antifeminist ones anyway) don't vote progressive, aren't very pro diversity but more pro meritocracy and believe in not trying to redefine western customs and rules of law to better suit them. Some even go so far as to not even want to interact with white people or be friends with them and stick with their own or ldar. Many of them don't even committ any crime.
Yet all the same you want them to live in separate countries? I don't see how you can see them as based but want them away from you.
Irrespective of that the problems with expecting based minorities establishing their own homeland is:
it costs a lot of money to set up a territory for a certain group of people in the first place, there are not many new areas of land to lay claim to for just one racial or ethnic group of people, trying to do this is not guaranteed success, there is no plan if negotiations for this fall through and so on.
The average person, let alone a westernized ethnic male, does not have enough resources to set up an ethnic homeland for other westernized ethnics. And as stated before they likely wouldn't be accepted in their ethnic country of origin either so they don't really have anywhere else to turn to. They would be dooming themselves to being stateless nomads on the brink of poverty and starvation.
Last edited: