Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion What is the real reason US secret service has a problem with us?

lonelycurry26

lonelycurry26

Self-banned
-
Joined
Apr 15, 2021
Posts
2,125
I mean they know we are not really a threat if they cared about the truth and that they are just trying to see us as what they want to see us as.


But why do they exactly have a problem with us? Are they scared that the blackpill mught keeo spreading and have a negative effect on society (demotivated men dropping out)?

Or are just women behind it, pressuring them to do something against us because women dont like what we say?

What do you guys think?
 
It's easy work. They can show that they are working on something and normies hate incels so it's good for everyone. It's not like working on some big case of drug deal or gang issue.
 
they don't want to know the truth ( :blackpill: )
 
I think us talking about the JBW pill hurts the feelings of the Vice President
 
because mossad infiltrated CIA eons ago, so now instead of fighting communism they are the communists
 
Most likely, they want a group of men they can manipulate into committing crimes to achieve political ends.
They're wasting their time here, when every fag on IT is one trigger-word away from a serious spree :feelsLSD:
 
They want to make everyone cuck, faggot and simp so that they can rule on us easily without any resistance but we all are standing like a wall to thwart their bad ambitions. That's why they hate us. We shall protect the humanity and men from all these monsters(feminists, Jews, faggots, simps, cucks).
 
Last edited:
The black pill is far from a revolutionary ideology if it even could be called one at all.

Everyone knows that looks are all that matters, only incels have to find out later in life that we're screwed. No, the SS(Merican version) just likes to have targets to scapegoat for the evils of capitalist system.

It is far easier to say male female relations have broken down due to ugly guys personality/violent tendencies than to say that due to the need to exploit every individual man woman and child for profit the family unit and by extension sexual relations have delinked.
 
1. There is an emergent SEXUAL INEQUALITY in the UNITED STATES due to cultural changes (sexual revolution -- the unleashing of female sexuality; without ENFORCED MONOGAMY female sexual choice does not somehow magically settle in a fair 1 to 1 way on all hetero males. No, what you get is jungle mating habits -- some men get harems and others get nothing. That female sexual liberty would equitability benefit all hetero males was an implicit feminist promise that has turned out to be disastrously wrong.)

2. Historically, violence has been the only way to reduce inequality. This book argues that:

The Great Leveler: Violence and the History of Inequality from the Stone Age to the Twenty-First Century (The Princeton Economic History of the Western World, 69)

3. IMO sharing the good of female erotic capital among hetero males is a BASIS of civilization that allowed men to cooperate. The bizzareness of modern dating culture interacting with point #2 is why "they" indeed have a reason to be concerned.
 
They're scouting, if it benefits them they will allow you to commit a crime. They do it all the time.
 
What do you guys think?

They have to justify their salaries. You see this with many government bureaucracies. One of the ways they do this is by manufacturing 'terrorism', or rather the illusion of it.
 
we are a scapegoat. the us govt loves to have a group to get voters riled up about. non existent terrorists, harmless immigration, commies in the red scare. or even the fall guys in iran contra.
They have to justify their salaries. You see this with many government bureaucracies. One of the ways they do this is by manufacturing 'terrorism', or rather the illusion of it.
also this
 
1. There is an emergent SEXUAL INEQUALITY in the UNITED STATES due to cultural changes (sexual revolution -- the unleashing of female sexuality; without ENFORCED MONOGAMY female sexual choice does not somehow magically settle in a fair 1 to 1 way on all hetero males. No, what you get is jungle mating habits -- some men get harems and others get nothing. That female sexual liberty would equitability benefit all hetero males was an implicit feminist promise that has turned out to be disastrously wrong.)

2. Historically, violence has been the only way to reduce inequality. This book argues that:

The Great Leveler: Violence and the History of Inequality from the Stone Age to the Twenty-First Century (The Princeton Economic History of the Western World, 69)

3. IMO sharing the good of female erotic capital among hetero males is a BASIS of civilization that allowed men to cooperate. The bizzareness of modern dating culture interacting with point #2 is why "they" indeed have a reason to be concerned.
Neuron Star IQ, based and well put mate
 
We name the jew.
 

Similar threads

Vlarke
Replies
53
Views
1K
Grim_Reaper
Grim_Reaper
sociology blackpill
Replies
1
Views
105
Ron.Belgrade
Ron.Belgrade
ars
Replies
37
Views
813
ElTruecel
ElTruecel
MisfitPerson
Replies
15
Views
462
Izayacel
Izayacel
AsiaCel
Replies
8
Views
284
Chudpreet
Chudpreet

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top