Philo
king of pERsonality
★★
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2024
- Posts
- 643
.
when they get chad's dick
18 of course, Agent Smith.
Below that age it's illegal.
It's not illegal to be attracted to foids below the age of consent. Also, I'm in Europe.18 of course, Agent Smith.
Below that age it's illegal.
yeah, their fertility window begins to closeLate teens and early twenties. It's downhill from there.
23 for both fertility and maturity if you’re looking to make babies and have a relationshit.
Probably 16 if you’re just looking for prime fertility age to make babies and spread your Chad seed/genes without committment.
over 13 = post-wall
when they get chad's dick
over 13 = post-wall
13 is illegal, 15-16 is good.13-16.
When they reach 17, they begin to rot and decay and look a lot older than they really are.
Could it be a glowie trying to make an article on us again?It's a 2024cel
That's why hebephilia isn't considered a mental illness even by the US.Hysteria about the age of consent is a largely Anglosphere phenomenon that was exported to countries over which the West has a lot of influence. In more traditional societies, girls are considered old enough when they enter puberty. Only in heavily puritan and feminist countries like the United States are young men and women called kids and treated as such.
If she is pubescent, then you are not a pedophile. Acting like you are is playing by the enemy's rule. There are many cases in our families of older men marrying adolescent girls and going on to have beautiful families. Never let them vilify this.
The DSM-5, the Bible of mental disorders, is very clear in distinguishing hebephilia and ephebophilia from pedophilia. Hebephilia is the primary or exclusive sexual or romantic attraction towards younger adolescents, while ephebophilia is the primary or exclusive sexual or romantic attraction towards older adolescents. None of them are classified as pedophilia, the primary or exclusive sexual or romantic attraction towards prepubescent people, namely children.That's why hebephilia isn't considered a mental illness even by the US.
18 of course, Agent Smith.
Below that age it's illegal.
the brutal truthOutside the womb = hit the wall
Some mfers are fucked now, kekCould it be a glowie trying to make an article on us again?
Feds once again wasting taxpayers money with these ridiculous questions
16 is legal age here, YOU GOT NOTHING ON ME!
"Ephebophilia" isn't even considered a paraphilia (abnormal sexual interest) because it's an attraction to SEXUALLY MATURE, PUBESCENT WOMEN in Tanner stages 4 or 5, which is usually 15–17 (coincidentally the AOCs for most modern, first world nations). This is why I don't even subscribe to this term because it's used in conjunction with pedophilia/hebephilia to vilify normal male sexuality, and because you don't call men who are attracted to age-of-majority women "teleiophiles," you just call them "straight" or "heterosexuals," so I would identify as "straight," "heterosexual," or "gynephile," but never this term.The DSM-5, the Bible of mental disorders, is very clear in distinguishing hebephilia and ephebophilia from pedophilia. Hebephilia is the primary or exclusive sexual or romantic attraction towards younger adolescents, while ephebophilia is the primary or exclusive sexual or romantic attraction towards older adolescents. None of them are classified as pedophilia, the primary or exclusive sexual or romantic attraction towards prepubescent people, namely children.
There is no substantial amount of evidence to justify the widespread idea that age gap relationships harm the youngest person. It only harms them in a psychological way because society insists that it's the worst sin.
Age gap relationships involving adolescent girls, who are young women in a practical sense, and older men should be normalized again. It's only ostracized because of narrow-mindedness and prejudice.
Mid-to-late adolescents typically have physical characteristics near or identical to that of legal adults.[11] Because of this, scholars Skye Stephens and Michael C. Seto argue that ephebophilia contrasts what a paraphilia entails since "older adolescents are reproductively viable and the fact that typically men are sexually attracted to older adolescents, as reflected in self-report, psychophysiological, and pornography use studies."[11]
Ephebophilia is used only to describe the preference for mid-to-late adolescent sexual partners, not the mere presence of some level of sexual attraction.[1] Generally, the preference is not regarded by psychologists as a pathology, as long as it does not interfere with other major areas of one's life. It is not included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) or the ICD-10.[3]
Our biology doesn't respond to laws or morals or social norms. Chronophilia is innate and biological. We are attracted to physical development, not age
over kindergarten = post wall and raped by the Chad dailyover 13 = post-wall
Very enriching information. Thank you."Ephebophilia" isn't even considered a paraphilia (abnormal sexual interest) because it's an attraction to SEXUALLY MATURE, PUBESCENT WOMEN in Tanner stages 4 or 5, which is usually 15–17 (coincidentally the AOCs for most modern, first world nations). This is why I don't even subscribe to this term because it's used in conjunction with pedophilia/hebephilia to vilify normal male sexuality, and because you don't call men who are attracted to age-of-majority women "teleiophiles," you just call them "straight" or "heterosexuals," so I would identify as "straight," "heterosexual," or "gynephile," but never this term.