As we all know, women do not actually have rights. Men just allow them to do things so long as women have sex with enough men in power.
In other words, women as a group are all prostitutes. They have sex with powerful men in exchange for rights.
Of course, there are some women who pretend that they can protect themselves with guns, but obviously, if men actually declared war on women, it would be the easiest war anybody has ever won. It's also funny that the same women who say this vote for Democrats who want to get rid of the second amendment.
Now, there are some men women genuinely want to have sex with, but it's pretty obvious this is not enough men to protect their rights. Women not only find 80+% of men ugly, but find maybe 5% of men at most to actually be sexually attractive (Chad).
Women pretend they don't owe men sex, but they actually do. They only don't owe ALL men sex because they have sex with enough men to protect their rights. If they didn't have sex with enough men, men would get rid of women's rights and women would owe all men sex.
This is what I call Sex Doctrine. Andrew Wilson had better not steal this.
The question is, what is the percentage of men who have to be incels in order to get rid of women's rights? What is the minimum percentage of men women need to have sex with to protect their rights?
Remember that men don't actually like women. The men who say they do are pretending in order to get in their pants.
Most men aren't getting nearly as much sex as they want, but the vast majority of men are still getting strung along.
Most sex is occasional, unenthusiastic starfish sex with normie men. This has proven sufficient to prevent a beta uprising.
This is the key figure for women's rights. I would say the necessary percentage is around 60%. 55% unenthusiastic sex, 5% Chad sex.
In other words, women as a group are all prostitutes. They have sex with powerful men in exchange for rights.
Of course, there are some women who pretend that they can protect themselves with guns, but obviously, if men actually declared war on women, it would be the easiest war anybody has ever won. It's also funny that the same women who say this vote for Democrats who want to get rid of the second amendment.
Now, there are some men women genuinely want to have sex with, but it's pretty obvious this is not enough men to protect their rights. Women not only find 80+% of men ugly, but find maybe 5% of men at most to actually be sexually attractive (Chad).
Women pretend they don't owe men sex, but they actually do. They only don't owe ALL men sex because they have sex with enough men to protect their rights. If they didn't have sex with enough men, men would get rid of women's rights and women would owe all men sex.
This is what I call Sex Doctrine. Andrew Wilson had better not steal this.
The question is, what is the percentage of men who have to be incels in order to get rid of women's rights? What is the minimum percentage of men women need to have sex with to protect their rights?
Remember that men don't actually like women. The men who say they do are pretending in order to get in their pants.
Most men aren't getting nearly as much sex as they want, but the vast majority of men are still getting strung along.
Most sex is occasional, unenthusiastic starfish sex with normie men. This has proven sufficient to prevent a beta uprising.
This is the key figure for women's rights. I would say the necessary percentage is around 60%. 55% unenthusiastic sex, 5% Chad sex.
