Do you think that in the future we may find a greater truth, and that the black pill was just a cope? Aldo i think, if we actualy go next level from where we are right now we will be entering Lovecraft levels of fucked up.
this world is already lovecraft levels of fucked up
no esoteric order of dagon compares to most of our lives.
no esoteric order of dagon compares to most of our lives.
isn't every single thing a cope?
whogivesafucc said:
I think we are still tipping our fingers into the shit ... that we are gonna drown in. Incels as a moovement has been up for just a few years now, wait a couple of generations and this are gonna get scary.
nah
Dekim said:
True, it's been a couple years and there's already been 1697816169017861 PSL theories
Mostly though it has just devolved to autistic shitposting such as "maybe the real reason I can't get a girl is because of my subhuman interocular distance bruh" or some shit. (just see 90% of posts on lookism lol)
Dekim said:
The blackpill is the belief that certain people are doomed to failure due to a set of disadvantages. Is it true? it is for some people but it may not be for others. You're the only one who know how far you can go.
P
the black pill is the great truth. looks are everything and everything is meaningless
whogivesafucc said:
I actualy have a theory (now bare with me here, it's still a theory) that inceldom is not based on looks but on intelligence, and the fact that people mate based on similar intelligence levels. Now ofcourse, looks do matter and especialy do so for hook ups, no question here, but my theory is about why it's impossible for us to find a partner not why we aren't slayers.
Now you gonna ask "But there are both smarter and dumber people than us with gfs?". That's absolutely true, but the problem with us is that we are stuck in such a paradox where we are usualy smarter or dumber than the people surrounding us and there so making it impossible for us to partner with someone. We are stuck where we aint smart enough for the smart and not dumb enough for the dumb, and there so left without any options.
I came up with this theory while observing couples during my workday... i'd see a lot of guys scoring my looks or even lower having gf, family, kids etc. BUT being so dumb (sharing the level of their gfs), that they actualy suit eachother perfectly. Think about it... these people share interests, but IF/WHEN we go out on a date we have to dumb ourselves down to our date's level instead of acting natural, which is why it doesn't work.
This is the short version, i may create a thread at some point with the actual wall of text.
Our existence is cope
Blackpill is definitely not a cope.
It protects us from being bluepilled beta cucks. I'd rather die a virgin than be some post-wall slut's betabux.
Honestly, I think that the red pill is the best option, but many of the key facets of this philosophy are futile for truecels to use (looksmax, PUA, etc)
You need to be a natural 5/10 to capitalize on the red pill.
It protects us from being bluepilled beta cucks. I'd rather die a virgin than be some post-wall slut's betabux.
Honestly, I think that the red pill is the best option, but many of the key facets of this philosophy are futile for truecels to use (looksmax, PUA, etc)
You need to be a natural 5/10 to capitalize on the red pill.
N
I'm not a black piller I think that there is some hope for me
L
The blackpill doesnt just mean looks are almost everything and that youre genetic looser ad cant change.
The blackpill stands universal for the hope shuttering truth that destroys your faith because its the ultimate confrontation with the reality.
Its a synonym that isnt bound on one part of the human existence
The blackpill stands universal for the hope shuttering truth that destroys your faith because its the ultimate confrontation with the reality.
Its a synonym that isnt bound on one part of the human existence
LuckyStrike said:
Strong words
Peter Wessel Zapffe is the father of all cope.
He laid out how all humans cope with existence in his essay The Last Messiah
https://philosophynow.org/issues/45/The_Last_Messiah
Isolation is the first method Zapffe noted, who defined it as "a fully arbitrary dismissal from consciousness of all disturbing and destructive thought and feeling" and cites "One should not think, it is just confusing" as an example.[1]
Anchoring, according to Zapffe, is the "fixation of points within, or construction of walls around, the liquid fray of consciousness". The anchoring mechanism provides individuals a value or an ideal that allows them to focus their attentions in a consistent manner. Zapffe compared this mechanism to Norwegian playwright Henrik Ibsen's concept of the life-lie from the play The Wild Duck, where the family has achieved a tolerable modus vivendi by ignoring the skeletons and by permitting each member to live in a dreamworld of his own. Zapffe also applied the anchoring principle to society, and stated "God, the Church, the State, morality, fate, the laws of life, the people, the future" are all examples of collective primary anchoring firmaments. He noted flaws in the principle's ability to properly address the human condition, and warned against the despair provoked resulting from discovering one's anchoring mechanism was false. Another shortcoming of anchoring is conflict between contradicting anchoring mechanisms, which Zapffe posits will bring one to destructive nihilism.[1]
Distraction is when "one limits attention to the critical bounds by constantly enthralling it with impressions."[1] Distraction focuses all of one's energy on a task or idea to prevent the mind from turning in on itself.
Sublimation is the refocusing of energy away from negative outlets, toward positive ones.
He laid out how all humans cope with existence in his essay The Last Messiah
https://philosophynow.org/issues/45/The_Last_Messiah
Isolation is the first method Zapffe noted, who defined it as "a fully arbitrary dismissal from consciousness of all disturbing and destructive thought and feeling" and cites "One should not think, it is just confusing" as an example.[1]
Anchoring, according to Zapffe, is the "fixation of points within, or construction of walls around, the liquid fray of consciousness". The anchoring mechanism provides individuals a value or an ideal that allows them to focus their attentions in a consistent manner. Zapffe compared this mechanism to Norwegian playwright Henrik Ibsen's concept of the life-lie from the play The Wild Duck, where the family has achieved a tolerable modus vivendi by ignoring the skeletons and by permitting each member to live in a dreamworld of his own. Zapffe also applied the anchoring principle to society, and stated "God, the Church, the State, morality, fate, the laws of life, the people, the future" are all examples of collective primary anchoring firmaments. He noted flaws in the principle's ability to properly address the human condition, and warned against the despair provoked resulting from discovering one's anchoring mechanism was false. Another shortcoming of anchoring is conflict between contradicting anchoring mechanisms, which Zapffe posits will bring one to destructive nihilism.[1]
Distraction is when "one limits attention to the critical bounds by constantly enthralling it with impressions."[1] Distraction focuses all of one's energy on a task or idea to prevent the mind from turning in on itself.
Sublimation is the refocusing of energy away from negative outlets, toward positive ones.
is it even possible to be more enlightened than the black pill?
someone needs to make a full blackpill pdf
Dekim said:
How do you tell someone's IQ from a tinder selfie
Panda said:
D
I don't think so
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
