Title. Just a thought experiment, nothing else
Last edited:
Experiment What if an incel nuked Manhattan (hypothetically)?
Making a nuclear bomb is actually pretty easy.
The hardest part is finding enriched uranium because u need shittons of uranium even for a small amounts and you need to process it somehow.
If u can figure that out u can be a nuclear terrorist.
I think it's gonna happen eventually.
The hardest part is finding enriched uranium because u need shittons of uranium even for a small amounts and you need to process it somehow.
If u can figure that out u can be a nuclear terrorist.
I think it's gonna happen eventually.
I know that, I just want to know what you guys think the fallout will be
The US would have no choice but to turn into a fascist police state in order to prevent future incidents
I don't know, because nothing evER happens
I mean the science behind it is pretty well known by now.
It's just acquiring enough fission material that's the problem.
Oppenheimer was incel
He wasn't a domestic terrorist that detonated one.
He just oversaw a project for the government to build nukes, he didn't actually go rogue and try to bring down America
He was based as fck
This is a cope because if you nuke Manhattan, you wouldn’t end degeneracy.You have to nuke western and jewish cities in general to end degeneracy
The US would have no choice but to turn into a fascist police state in order to prevent future incidents
Giga based
Bump
It would be Manflatten
Bump
You need to get a nuke first. For most it's impossible to get.
That's why it's a thought experiment of what could happen if the US was caught flat-footed
Not much would happen but it would be very funny
Lol
The stock market would tank and most of the Forbes 400 will be either six feet under or bankrupt in the immediate aftermath
Not even considering the long term economic consequences JFL
It might spur the U.S. to enact stringent domestic surveillance dwarfing the post 9/11 reaction and perhaps another war on terror
Last edited:
I
Nukes don't exist
They do exist buddy boyo
I
PSyop
Greatly overrated.
Manhattan is just some buildings where rich people meet each others to talk about stuff.
Factories wont be touched.
Construction sites wont be touched.
Mines and fields wont be touched.
CIA/FBI HQs wont be touched.
No army base will be touched.
The only thing that will change is that the gov will become more authoritarian and a surveillance state, but that will happen anyway. Such a terrorist attack would just give them an excuse to enact their plan a bit faster.
I am not well versed on economics, but since economic recessions and even depressions are in large part caused by psychological factors such as consumer confidence and sense of security, inflicting such a huge psychological blow to that (Most on the Forbes 400 dead or bankrupt, millions of dead civilians and tourists) will damage the economy regardless of any material economic fundamentals
As for the gov becoming a surveillance state, that is by no means an inevitability for the foreseeable future despite the hand wringing of many anti-Trump liberals and libertarians. The US is protected by two giant moats and is the most geopolitically safe country on the planet. Part of the reason why it could engage in expensive and wasteful foreign adventures in backwater regions of the world and also why the Post 9/11 increase in domestic surveillance is still not as stringent on the comparative level as say, the UK
Obviously, if Manhattan was nuked by domestic terrorists, the current political trajectory of the US will change and an American Police State will enter the realm of possibility
Last edited:
What do you guys think will happen?
@DarthBurritoBastard (when he's back) @pedrolopezwasright @Castaway
Yea the stock market would crash but who cares ? The things that really matter wont be much affected. Food and housing and energy will still be produce with little to no difference.
Im neither a liberal nor a libertarian but it already is a surveillance state. Part directly through the gov but also they outsourced the work to private companies like Meta.
They also have drones in the sky watching over whoever they see as a menace. (Thats helped to prove Rittenhouse's innocence, iirc)
I have no clue what that means
Sure, but that like saying being a double amputee is fine cause ur not a quadruple amputee
Are you sure about libertarians? Trump freed their idol Ross; I don't see valid libertarian movement emerging either, only controlled opposition.
Technological progress leads to police states; How could they control people without it becoming reality? You already can print weapons on ender pro. Without total control this generation will grow up as rightful opposition to despots. Therefore as I don't consider myself as neo-luddite anymore, I'm all for police state which will work on raw logic.
Many richfag sexhavers would die i assume
It is, but execution is pretty fucked. Such state would be able to control everything. Instead it is limited to catching big targets and fucking up with seeing a big picture. Overgeneralised approach to spying on people fails always it is trying to emerge in pseudo-democratic country such as US. North Korea for example never needed such transformation for example, therefore isn't a valid approach in US.Im neither a liberal nor a libertarian but it already is a surveillance state. Part directly through the gov but also they outsourced the work to private companies like Meta.
Probably a lot of shit. No idea.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
