what do you think about the fine tuning argument?

[philocel_]

to be specific the one about physical laws and shiiiii

 

[philocel_]

i think its a good argument for a designer

 

[xek000000kk]

what is it

 

[philocel_]

what is it

Fine-tuning means that the universe's physical constants and conditions must fall within extremely narrow ranges for life to exist. Because these values appear highly precise and unlikely to have occurred by chance, many theists argue that they are best explained by an intelligent designer who intentionally set them that way.

 

[xek000000kk]

Fine-tuning means that the universe's physical constants and conditions must fall within extremely narrow ranges for life to exist. Because these values appear highly precise and unlikely to have occurred by chance, many theists argue that they are best explained by an intelligent designer who intentionally set them that way.

Human understanding beyond Mars, the moon, or the solar system is very limited. The theory of the formation of the solar system is also incorrect because many satellites of planets in the solar system have perfect orbits, which is illogical if planets captured them. Or the moon was created from a part of Earth, but this hypothesis is also incorrect because the moon doesn't have many elements from Earth and it's hollow. It's highly likely that the satellites were "placed" because they are mathematically perfect. Determining exoplanets using light is also not certain and is full of unprovable assumptions. Okay, I've gone a bit off track. My point is that fine-tuning is quite reasonable, but that doesn't mean it's correct due to the limitations of human knowledge.