Fontaine
Overlord
★★★★★
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2017
- Posts
- 5,417
To make it clear that most incels are not violent.
You're not the only one. I've always felt that most normies and journalists derive a poorly hidden morbid excitement from terrorism. They go to such great lengths to hide their pleasure and adopt a "mourning face", all the while secretly hoping for a bigger and more impressive death toll (you can see this in the frantic search for the "latest latest latest information" about the number of victims, which should matter far less than whether or not the terrorists have been arrested.)I find terrorist attacks quite exciting in a sort of deranged way.
I think it's more prosaic. Pujadas was just happy because blood in the streets covered by him meant there was a chance that a lot more people would be watching the news that day, and thus would generate bigger audience shares and direct pecuniary profits for the channel and himself.n France, David Pujadas (a big TV journalist) was seen in great joy and excitement when he heard about the first plane crashing into WTC on 9/11.
It has an evolutionary basis. Monkeys feel relief when someone other than them has been hit by a predator. It probably also has a more modern basis. Terrorism, for a moment, makes possible the perspective of the end of civilization and the status quo.
I find terrorist attacks quite exciting in a sort of deranged way.
I enjoy a school shooting as much as the next guy, but tbh most of them were pointless. At least I.S.I.S had some motive that both make sense and aligns with their actionsLike school shooting or isis.
Sure some of them, but most of the served a purpose. They didn't do it for fun, they wanted to teach a leason to the world.I enjoy a school shooting as much as the next guy, but tbh most of them were pointless. At least I.S.I.S had some motive that both make sense and aligns with their actions
While not supporting them (at least not with my good side), I must admit I sometimes find hilarious the biography of certain terrorist groups. Their members are usually self-righteous and completely delusional (either about their chances of winning or about the compatibility of murder with their brand of idealism), and contrasting this delusion with the poor hapless victims whose death was completely vain and arbitrary, produces some kind of dark comedic effect.I find terror attacks amusing, I support most terror groups worldwide, the ira are my favorite
While not supporting them (at least not with my good side), I must admit I sometimes find hilarious the biography of certain terrorist groups. Their members are usually completely delusional (either about their chances of winning or about the compatibility of murder with their brand of idealism), and contrasting this delusion with the poor hapless victims whose death was completely vain and arbitrary, produces some kind of dark comedic effect.
For instance, I still can't understand why the Armed Islamic Group of Algeria thought randomly exterminating whole villages who had done nothing to them in the 1990s would somehow increase popular support for Islamism. Can somebody explain it to me?
Columbine and Virginia Tech seemed to be for a cause of sorts, the rest was more for personal reasonsSure some of them, but most of the served a purpose. They didn't do it for fun, they wanted to teach a leason to the world.
Then ask them about the 1990s in this country. The Algerian civil war is a matter of public record, and the deaths haven't been invented. Look it up on wikipedia.Even ISIS does not randomly exterminate whole villages,I doubt that Algeria really went under that kind of trouble. Algeria is very homogeneous and there is no sectarian violence like in the middle east, almost all Algerians are from the same sect/religion/ethnic background (I know it because I have Algerian family members).
Then ask them about the 1990s in this country. The Algerian civil war is a matter of public record, and the deaths haven't been invented. Look it up on wikipedia.
The antics of Zitouni and his GIA, which included razing villages to the ground, are well documented. Have they been exaggerated by government propaganda? Maybe, I don't know.It was a civil war between Islamists and Secularists (the islamists won the democratic elections). Sure it was brutal, but I think the war was pretty rational without that much of unnecessarily killings. Also a war between 2 political parties is not terrorism, terrorism is intentionally killing innocent people for ideological purposes.
The hard truth is that if you're not living in Antarctica, you're fostering our shitty system as much as normies by buying and consuming. We are all guilty.Terrorist attacks against innocent civilians is not oke, however to what extant are civilians 'innocent'? They are a reason for our miserable state.... So i choose: "My opinion on violence is unstable and changes with my mood."
Take a look at my signature
The hard truth is that if you're not living in Antarctica, you're fostering our shitty system as much as normies by buying and consuming. We are all guilty.
Are you a hunter gatherer who dwells in a cave and wears moose fur? Oh true..you're on a computer. You're a good little consumer like everyone else.I'm NeetBuxxing and using Chads and Stacy's to work and wagecuck for my NeetBux money.... I'm not contributing to society.
Are you a hunter gatherer who dwells in a cave and wears moose fur? Oh true..you're on a computer. You're a good little consumer like everyone else.
Welcome my dude.That's legit the best quote i've ever read, THANK YOU.
Same here I got a dopamine rush after reading the kill count about the las vegas shooting, I'm hoping for bombings tho (I'd also love to see attacks and shootings to get worse) I like really obsess over the perptitrater like it's a villain from a tv series I like it. It's like a bloody lore playing out in real lifeEveryday I check news about shooting, uplifting tbh.
It's my daily entertainment now