Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

What are woman's weaknesses in the socio sexual hierarchy ?

M

Moody-Silver

Banned
-
Joined
Aug 21, 2021
Posts
685
Men get desperate and feel needy for sex, some men get nuts and become emotionally week so they feel needy for love, affection and validation.
Women use that to humiliate men and take power over them.
They reject you or friendzone you and even if they give you a chance, they will fuckzone you.

They tell you just wait them until they hit the wall.
The wall is a cope. Women don't hit the wall but they just have less options with age. They will still get better options than men in their 20s.

Even when women feel needy for sex, they will fantasize only about CHAD.
They will get wet only for CHAD.

I think women are sexual objects so they have no weakness in the socio sexual hierarchy.
Men are cursed by nature.

Men also cursed themselves by giving freedom to women.
Women were nothing more than property, a sex slaves.
 
Guys are the ones who determines whether or not the couple in question is going to get married (usually)
 
none
the foids hold all the power in this jew soyciety
 
The only purpose of legislation is to benefit women. Laws only come into question when men have a natural advantage. When women are advantaged, then there is freedom for holes to exploit.
 
Guys are the ones who determines whether or not the couple in question is going to get married (usually)

That's like deciding when you will become an indentured servant.
 
That's like deciding when you will become an indentured servant.

Yeah, and that´s one of the main reasons behind the decisionist power of guys over women in regards to marriage.
 
:chad: is their weakness
 
If by "weakness" you mean something that balances their advantages so that the system is "fair" like a video game them no, they have no weaknesses. The system isn't remotely fair.

But if by "weakness" you mean a flaw that prevents them from achieving their longterm goal, then yes they do have a weakness. I don't think there's a single word to label it, but essentially they are set up for failure and most of them will not achieve a happy life even though it would have been easy for them to do so.

Their age is a huge factor in their overall value. An average girl just entering the dating market at around 18 has an overall value of at least 8. I know it sounds strange to say "an average is an 8" but I'm saying she's average in her cohort of 18 year olds, but she's an 8 if you compare her to all women.

Her "weakness" is that this value declines rapidly. Within five years she has declined to a 6, and by the time she's thirty, most women are 5 or below. More to the point, the weakness is that she's going to live for 90 or even 100 years, but she has only 10 years, only 1/10th of that time, to have this high value.
  • She is not aware of this fact (literally nothing in society explains this to women) so she will waste those 10 years
  • The choices she makes during those 10 years set her standards so high that she can never be happy with any many she gets afterwards
The winning strategy for an average 18 year old girl is to marry an average man a few years older than her who is sufficiently ambitious and hardworking that he will be able to provide a comfortable life for her and her offspring. She should give this man children in her 20s, and encourage and support him in his career.

By the time she's 40, her value will be 4 or less, but her husband's value (due to his income) will be 6 or 7. With that income, she can then cruise through the rest of her life on easy mode. She'll experience substantial happiness from her children. She will have pair-bonded with her husband, and he with her so she'll feel loved. She'll eventually have grandchildren in her old age = more happiness. She can pursue a career, if she wants to, but that's option and so it wont stress her out. And if her husband betrays her (because now he's capable of getting a younger, hotter woman), the government will protect her with a divorce settlement (half his shit) plus alimony plus child support.

...unfortunately, few women discover this strategy.

What she'll actually end up doing is wasting her 10 year window. She'll bang Chads who are 8s, 9s and even 10s, and she'll collect "standards" from each one. One of them is tall, so her standard will be "I only date 6'2" - another will have a huge dick so her standard will be big dicks - another will be rich - another will be low-inhib or generally crazy, but that will be fun and adventurous to her so that'll be her standard too.

She wont even ask these men for commitment until she's at least 25. It will have been so easy to get these men, and they will have been so plentiful, that she will assume she can get commitment at any time. So, she'll "have fun" and "explore" and "find herself" all of which are euphemisms for promiscuity.

Between 25 and 30, she will start seeking commitment and will be frustrated when she cannot get it. She will begin limiting herself to only men who say they'll commit. Some of these men will lie to her, others will have been willing to commit, but they wont like her personality. She'll even break up with a few of them herself. Any of these outcomes just means more time wasted as her value slips lower and lower and the value of the men she can attract goes down too.

She will use the word "settling" to mean lowering her standards to the level of men who are actually willing to marry her. But given that her expectations, set by years of banging Chads, are a collection of attributes from dozens or hundreds of men ... there is zero probability she will be happy with an average guy.

But she probably will get married anyway. And she'll probably have a kid. But she will never really love the man she married. She just wanted the wedding day - the big party. And she'll never find happiness through her children, because she never focuses on them.

She will have to have a career. It's not optional. She will burn out in this career and be stressed, frantic, depressed, and deeply, deeply unhappy. She will get divorced, her kids will be assholes, and she will never again be happy trying to date.

And that will be the story of her for the next 50 years.

That's their weakness.
 
If by "weakness" you mean something that balances their advantages so that the system is "fair" like a video game them no, they have no weaknesses. The system isn't remotely fair.

But if by "weakness" you mean a flaw that prevents them from achieving their longterm goal, then yes they do have a weakness. I don't think there's a single word to label it, but essentially they are set up for failure and most of them will not achieve a happy life even though it would have been easy for them to do so.

Their age is a huge factor in their overall value. An average girl just entering the dating market at around 18 has an overall value of at least 8. I know it sounds strange to say "an average is an 8" but I'm saying she's average in her cohort of 18 year olds, but she's an 8 if you compare her to all women.

Her "weakness" is that this value declines rapidly. Within five years she has declined to a 6, and by the time she's thirty, most women are 5 or below. More to the point, the weakness is that she's going to live for 90 or even 100 years, but she has only 10 years, only 1/10th of that time, to have this high value.
  • She is not aware of this fact (literally nothing in society explains this to women) so she will waste those 10 years
  • The choices she makes during those 10 years set her standards so high that she can never be happy with any many she gets afterwards
The winning strategy for an average 18 year old girl is to marry an average man a few years older than her who is sufficiently ambitious and hardworking that he will be able to provide a comfortable life for her and her offspring. She should give this man children in her 20s, and encourage and support him in his career.

By the time she's 40, her value will be 4 or less, but her husband's value (due to his income) will be 6 or 7. With that income, she can then cruise through the rest of her life on easy mode. She'll experience substantial happiness from her children. She will have pair-bonded with her husband, and he with her so she'll feel loved. She'll eventually have grandchildren in her old age = more happiness. She can pursue a career, if she wants to, but that's option and so it wont stress her out. And if her husband betrays her (because now he's capable of getting a younger, hotter woman), the government will protect her with a divorce settlement (half his shit) plus alimony plus child support.

...unfortunately, few women discover this strategy.

What she'll actually end up doing is wasting her 10 year window. She'll bang Chads who are 8s, 9s and even 10s, and she'll collect "standards" from each one. One of them is tall, so her standard will be "I only date 6'2" - another will have a huge dick so her standard will be big dicks - another will be rich - another will be low-inhib or generally crazy, but that will be fun and adventurous to her so that'll be her standard too.

She wont even ask these men for commitment until she's at least 25. It will have been so easy to get these men, and they will have been so plentiful, that she will assume she can get commitment at any time. So, she'll "have fun" and "explore" and "find herself" all of which are euphemisms for promiscuity.

Between 25 and 30, she will start seeking commitment and will be frustrated when she cannot get it. She will begin limiting herself to only men who say they'll commit. Some of these men will lie to her, others will have been willing to commit, but they wont like her personality. She'll even break up with a few of them herself. Any of these outcomes just means more time wasted as her value slips lower and lower and the value of the men she can attract goes down too.

She will use the word "settling" to mean lowering her standards to the level of men who are actually willing to marry her. But given that her expectations, set by years of banging Chads, are a collection of attributes from dozens or hundreds of men ... there is zero probability she will be happy with an average guy.

But she probably will get married anyway. And she'll probably have a kid. But she will never really love the man she married. She just wanted the wedding day - the big party. And she'll never find happiness through her children, because she never focuses on them.

She will have to have a career. It's not optional. She will burn out in this career and be stressed, frantic, depressed, and deeply, deeply unhappy. She will get divorced, her kids will be assholes, and she will never again be happy trying to date.

And that will be the story of her for the next 50 years.

That's their weakness.
 
If by "weakness" you mean something that balances their advantages so that the system is "fair" like a video game them no, they have no weaknesses. The system isn't remotely fair.

But if by "weakness" you mean a flaw that prevents them from achieving their longterm goal, then yes they do have a weakness. I don't think there's a single word to label it, but essentially they are set up for failure and most of them will not achieve a happy life even though it would have been easy for them to do so.

Their age is a huge factor in their overall value. An average girl just entering the dating market at around 18 has an overall value of at least 8. I know it sounds strange to say "an average is an 8" but I'm saying she's average in her cohort of 18 year olds, but she's an 8 if you compare her to all women.

Her "weakness" is that this value declines rapidly. Within five years she has declined to a 6, and by the time she's thirty, most women are 5 or below. More to the point, the weakness is that she's going to live for 90 or even 100 years, but she has only 10 years, only 1/10th of that time, to have this high value.
  • She is not aware of this fact (literally nothing in society explains this to women) so she will waste those 10 years
  • The choices she makes during those 10 years set her standards so high that she can never be happy with any many she gets afterwards
The winning strategy for an average 18 year old girl is to marry an average man a few years older than her who is sufficiently ambitious and hardworking that he will be able to provide a comfortable life for her and her offspring. She should give this man children in her 20s, and encourage and support him in his career.

By the time she's 40, her value will be 4 or less, but her husband's value (due to his income) will be 6 or 7. With that income, she can then cruise through the rest of her life on easy mode. She'll experience substantial happiness from her children. She will have pair-bonded with her husband, and he with her so she'll feel loved. She'll eventually have grandchildren in her old age = more happiness. She can pursue a career, if she wants to, but that's option and so it wont stress her out. And if her husband betrays her (because now he's capable of getting a younger, hotter woman), the government will protect her with a divorce settlement (half his shit) plus alimony plus child support.

...unfortunately, few women discover this strategy.

What she'll actually end up doing is wasting her 10 year window. She'll bang Chads who are 8s, 9s and even 10s, and she'll collect "standards" from each one. One of them is tall, so her standard will be "I only date 6'2" - another will have a huge dick so her standard will be big dicks - another will be rich - another will be low-inhib or generally crazy, but that will be fun and adventurous to her so that'll be her standard too.

She wont even ask these men for commitment until she's at least 25. It will have been so easy to get these men, and they will have been so plentiful, that she will assume she can get commitment at any time. So, she'll "have fun" and "explore" and "find herself" all of which are euphemisms for promiscuity.

Between 25 and 30, she will start seeking commitment and will be frustrated when she cannot get it. She will begin limiting herself to only men who say they'll commit. Some of these men will lie to her, others will have been willing to commit, but they wont like her personality. She'll even break up with a few of them herself. Any of these outcomes just means more time wasted as her value slips lower and lower and the value of the men she can attract goes down too.

She will use the word "settling" to mean lowering her standards to the level of men who are actually willing to marry her. But given that her expectations, set by years of banging Chads, are a collection of attributes from dozens or hundreds of men ... there is zero probability she will be happy with an average guy.

But she probably will get married anyway. And she'll probably have a kid. But she will never really love the man she married. She just wanted the wedding day - the big party. And she'll never find happiness through her children, because she never focuses on them.

She will have to have a career. It's not optional. She will burn out in this career and be stressed, frantic, depressed, and deeply, deeply unhappy. She will get divorced, her kids will be assholes, and she will never again be happy trying to date.

And that will be the story of her for the next 50 years.

That's their weakness.
high iq
 
If by "weakness" you mean something that balances their advantages so that the system is "fair" like a video game them no, they have no weaknesses. The system isn't remotely fair.

But if by "weakness" you mean a flaw that prevents them from achieving their longterm goal, then yes they do have a weakness. I don't think there's a single word to label it, but essentially they are set up for failure and most of them will not achieve a happy life even though it would have been easy for them to do so.

Their age is a huge factor in their overall value. An average girl just entering the dating market at around 18 has an overall value of at least 8. I know it sounds strange to say "an average is an 8" but I'm saying she's average in her cohort of 18 year olds, but she's an 8 if you compare her to all women.

Her "weakness" is that this value declines rapidly. Within five years she has declined to a 6, and by the time she's thirty, most women are 5 or below. More to the point, the weakness is that she's going to live for 90 or even 100 years, but she has only 10 years, only 1/10th of that time, to have this high value.
  • She is not aware of this fact (literally nothing in society explains this to women) so she will waste those 10 years
  • The choices she makes during those 10 years set her standards so high that she can never be happy with any many she gets afterwards
The winning strategy for an average 18 year old girl is to marry an average man a few years older than her who is sufficiently ambitious and hardworking that he will be able to provide a comfortable life for her and her offspring. She should give this man children in her 20s, and encourage and support him in his career.

By the time she's 40, her value will be 4 or less, but her husband's value (due to his income) will be 6 or 7. With that income, she can then cruise through the rest of her life on easy mode. She'll experience substantial happiness from her children. She will have pair-bonded with her husband, and he with her so she'll feel loved. She'll eventually have grandchildren in her old age = more happiness. She can pursue a career, if she wants to, but that's option and so it wont stress her out. And if her husband betrays her (because now he's capable of getting a younger, hotter woman), the government will protect her with a divorce settlement (half his shit) plus alimony plus child support.

...unfortunately, few women discover this strategy.

What she'll actually end up doing is wasting her 10 year window. She'll bang Chads who are 8s, 9s and even 10s, and she'll collect "standards" from each one. One of them is tall, so her standard will be "I only date 6'2" - another will have a huge dick so her standard will be big dicks - another will be rich - another will be low-inhib or generally crazy, but that will be fun and adventurous to her so that'll be her standard too.

She wont even ask these men for commitment until she's at least 25. It will have been so easy to get these men, and they will have been so plentiful, that she will assume she can get commitment at any time. So, she'll "have fun" and "explore" and "find herself" all of which are euphemisms for promiscuity.

Between 25 and 30, she will start seeking commitment and will be frustrated when she cannot get it. She will begin limiting herself to only men who say they'll commit. Some of these men will lie to her, others will have been willing to commit, but they wont like her personality. She'll even break up with a few of them herself. Any of these outcomes just means more time wasted as her value slips lower and lower and the value of the men she can attract goes down too.

She will use the word "settling" to mean lowering her standards to the level of men who are actually willing to marry her. But given that her expectations, set by years of banging Chads, are a collection of attributes from dozens or hundreds of men ... there is zero probability she will be happy with an average guy.

But she probably will get married anyway. And she'll probably have a kid. But she will never really love the man she married. She just wanted the wedding day - the big party. And she'll never find happiness through her children, because she never focuses on them.

She will have to have a career. It's not optional. She will burn out in this career and be stressed, frantic, depressed, and deeply, deeply unhappy. She will get divorced, her kids will be assholes, and she will never again be happy trying to date.

And that will be the story of her for the next 50 years.

That's their weakness.
:blackpill::blackpill::blackpill:
 
Yes they have weakness. They simp for chads even if chad is abusive (which eventually they become as they develop superiority complex from all the pussies thrown at him). Their inherent desires won't let them leave abusive chad, even if she is murdered.

Women will jump off rooftops if a chad orders (yes, orders) them to do so. They lose all their freedom and become slaves.

Also, foids have to constantly feel disgust, humiliation and discomfort because many average and below average men are interested in her when she dresses like a whore and goes out in public (so called harassment by soyciety).
 
An Smoothness AI sex robot will destroy women power entirely
 

Similar threads

Logic55
Replies
15
Views
510
Vendetta
Vendetta
Logic55
Replies
6
Views
183
Logic55
Logic55
arthur17
Replies
2
Views
272
balkanceI
balkanceI
ForeverGrey
Replies
45
Views
1K
illumizoldyck
illumizoldyck

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top