Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Western Europe can really benefit from an eastward expension

O

Over4Mexicels

Banned
-
Joined
Aug 5, 2019
Posts
1,166
Seriously. Assuming no parties use nukes.

  1. This would uncuck Europe.No more feminism, multiculturalism, transexual & gay worship.
  2. Eastern foids will welcome you with open arms. This in turn will make european foids lower their standards, in other words, no more europeancels.
  3. Great open living spaces with lots of beautiful places to visit. No more stress traffic, overpopulated cities, etc.
  4. New market possibilities for european entrepreneurs.
  5. European males will find a new purpose in life.
  6. You can finally vindicate Hitler's name.

The only downside will be for Slavs, as they will die in the millions & will be regarded as second class citizens.
 
Last edited:
what is 'eeastward expansion'
 
This would actually result in the opposite effect, the further cuckening of Europe.
 
bro what are you telling
 
Are you retarded? As if the 2nd world war didn't do enough damage already. There is nothing that would make (((them))) happier than another war between europeans.
 
No I don't think so. Militarization would eradicate cuckoldry.
The spread of EU hegemony eastward, incorporating Russia into its domains, would actually result in less militarization.
 
I would like to see Westerners try to do this because this would only result in another based totalitarian Eastern Bloc after Russia drives them out all the way to Rhine and purges the Western influence out for good.

JFL at wimpy Europeans trying to do anything to Russia (despite how much of a joke Russian society is in its own way). They couldn't beat Russia when they were much stronger with Napoleon and Hitler and you think some EU LGBT-flag waving "army" is going to conquer Russia?
 
The spread of EU hegemony eastward, incorporating Russia into its domains, would actually result in less militarization.

EU is a cucked organization. An european-only NATO-like organization is the way to go.
 
I would like to see Westerners try to do this because this would only result in another based totalitarian Eastern Bloc after Russia drives them out all the way to Rhine and purges the Western influence out for good.

JFL at wimpy Europeans trying to do anything to Russia (despite how much of a joke Russian society is in its own way). They couldn't beat Russia when they were much stronger with Napoleon and Hitler and you think some EU LGBT-flag waving "army" is going to conquer Russia?

Only with american help were the russians able to drive the Western armies.
Are you making a joke? How do these two statements work together?


Slav males will die in millions

Slavic foids are known for cucking their males with the invading armies
 
Are you making a joke? How do these two statements work together?
He's saying that Slavic men will be cucked by an influx of Western European sex migrants (sub8s) after their lands are made economic colonies of Western Europe.

And that somehow this will result in less feminism, even though Eastern European women would attach themselves to these Western European men precisely for hypergamic reasons, and within a generation or two would have enough financial standing to base their hypergamy completely on looks.
 
Last edited:
LOL man. Just fucking stop with this cucked Westerner propaganda.
It's not propaganda. The russians even gave huge chunks of land to Germany in WW1 (Brest-Litovsk). As for WW2, without American aid, Russia would be an extinct nation, most probably, just a confederation of different ethnicities.
He's saying that Slavic men will be cucked by an influx of Western European sex migrants (sub8s) after their lands are made economic colonies of Western Europe.

And that somehow this will result in less feminism, even though Eastern European women would attach themselves to these Western European men precisely for hypergamic reasons, and after a generation or two would have enough financial standing to base their hypergamy completely on looks.

it's a mog or be mogged clown world, you either play by its rule or you perish

Do western europeans wish to perish?

I even think this would benefit America too, making south america their economic/sex colonies
 
Last edited:
EU is a cucked organization. An european-only NATO-like organization is the way to go.
Imagining a military war rather than peaceful economic integration is absurd.

You are nothing but an imperialist who wants to distract the people of Western Europe away from their true problems (their own politicians/their own capitalists/their own women), and temporarily ease the social tensions they've created through the acquisition of new lands and new women, giving credence to the old ruling order.
 
Last edited:
I hope europe gets pressured by the Russians, everyone hates us. We should withdraw all of our military forces from every country that doesn't want us there. Most Americans are getting to the point where we're thinking "fuck our shit talking euro allies, let's focus on asia and containing china". Germany obviously wants the lead in Europe but their pussified politicians will never allow for an effective military.
 
it's a mog or be mogged clown world, you either play by its rule or you perish

"Clown-world" is a defeatist psy-op specifically meant to put people in this mindset, where true change is impossible and the cultural hegemony is divine, immutable.

As I've said, your vision would do nothing except stall current social trends by a few generations, buying the ruling class of the West some time.

But this is wrong. What we should be doing is giving the elite no quarter, exacerbating the contradictions they've created until they crumble underneath them (and are murdered/sodomized by their own people in the streets).


Edit: This thread is a good example of how a left-wing revolutionary perspective on things is actually more nationalist than a supposedly "nationalist" perspective from the right-wing, because the latter is conducive to imperialism, and thus the perpetuation of the ruling class's power.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

JuliusEvola
Replies
32
Views
530
based_meme
B
Shaktiman
Replies
49
Views
4K
anotherwastedlife
anotherwastedlife
AsiaCel
Replies
18
Views
1K
MoggedByALoli
MoggedByALoli

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top