Just like the Council of Nicea was held to affirm the apostles' teaching about Jesus Christ, we need to affirm the incel doctrine.
Lately, I've been seeing "former incels" posting stories on CuckTears for attention. I read one that basically said "Incels are wrong because I saw some random normies having sex and they weren't Chad - I even saw manlets. And after a load of rejections, I broke free (kind of)'
One thing to note is that he wasn't ugly. So was he ever incel? Can you incel as a non-virgin? Do you have to be utterly unapproachable to be incel? Because if you do eventually get sex, does that mean you were NEVER incel because the chance was always there, you just weren't taking it.
This would mean Elliot Rodger was never even an incel... Although that isn't too wild a notion to accept, many here have classified him as a mentalcel. He was rich and he wasn't unattractive but he was obsessed with blonde white girls.
Now you may be thinking, no one cares but the truth is that it matters. We need to stop fakecels. Women are now claiming to be incel but the catch is that they're doing it for the same reasons I see some people doing here: "I can get sex, but I want validation/love/LTR". Does this mean if you refuse hookers, you're a volcel? Or if you refuse unattractive women, you're a volcel? Or should you only have sex with people you're attracted to, in that case what are some of us mad at women about, ASSUMING you can even be incel and ugly.
Identifying as an incel has become confusing because of the smokescreens put up by fakecels and volcels claiming to be incel, and let's not forget the mentalcels - the good proportion of which aren't even mentally ill but lack good socialization.
Seeing as the word celibate stems from the Latin word for being unmarried and the modern use of the word doesn't imply virginity, I guess it just means you can't get sex against your will. But do you really want sex if you have never even requested for it before or made any attempts to get it? (I feel I understand the hostility towards teens, now)
Lately, I've been seeing "former incels" posting stories on CuckTears for attention. I read one that basically said "Incels are wrong because I saw some random normies having sex and they weren't Chad - I even saw manlets. And after a load of rejections, I broke free (kind of)'
One thing to note is that he wasn't ugly. So was he ever incel? Can you incel as a non-virgin? Do you have to be utterly unapproachable to be incel? Because if you do eventually get sex, does that mean you were NEVER incel because the chance was always there, you just weren't taking it.
This would mean Elliot Rodger was never even an incel... Although that isn't too wild a notion to accept, many here have classified him as a mentalcel. He was rich and he wasn't unattractive but he was obsessed with blonde white girls.
Now you may be thinking, no one cares but the truth is that it matters. We need to stop fakecels. Women are now claiming to be incel but the catch is that they're doing it for the same reasons I see some people doing here: "I can get sex, but I want validation/love/LTR". Does this mean if you refuse hookers, you're a volcel? Or if you refuse unattractive women, you're a volcel? Or should you only have sex with people you're attracted to, in that case what are some of us mad at women about, ASSUMING you can even be incel and ugly.
Identifying as an incel has become confusing because of the smokescreens put up by fakecels and volcels claiming to be incel, and let's not forget the mentalcels - the good proportion of which aren't even mentally ill but lack good socialization.
Seeing as the word celibate stems from the Latin word for being unmarried and the modern use of the word doesn't imply virginity, I guess it just means you can't get sex against your will. But do you really want sex if you have never even requested for it before or made any attempts to get it? (I feel I understand the hostility towards teens, now)
