Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill We men are a commodity

SUH

SUH

Veteran
Joined
May 17, 2018
Posts
1,019
Women are the buyers. The demand for males depends on our accessibility and their purchasing power. However with social media giving access to previously inaccessible high quality men and financial independence the buying power of the female sex has increased so that the demand for below average males has completely dissappeared. Uncontrolled immigration has allowed men who racially mog(whites in asia, arabs and tyrone in europe) the men in their host country to reduce reduce the value of the local men(asian men in asia, white men in europe).

This is sexual "globalization" to put it simply, is causing inceldom. This is why the supply of men should be regulated by a central authority(authoritarian sexual socialism) instead of a sexual free market. Governments and media should increase positive representation of low quality men, so that women start having a demand for them.
 
High IQ. We need a sexual dictatorship of the proletariat.
 
Low iq men are disposable cum machines
 
Low iq men are disposable cum machines
Ive noticed that its not taboo to say in academia and society that women are more valuable because they look after the offspring but its ebuhl mysoginy to say that women are less valuable because theyre just physically inferior baby factories.
 
High IQ

We’re told by feminists than women are treated like objects, but in fact it is the opposite. Men are the objects, and women control society.
 
Ive noticed that its not taboo to say in academia and society that women are more valuable because they look after the offspring but its ebuhl mysoginy to say that women are less valuable because theyre just physically inferior baby factories.

That's true, the second statement is the truth, while the first one is just overinflation of their value.

I think that femoids are still the commodities, but the cuckerment helped them to price themselves out of average man's purchasing range. After all, it's men who buy women, not viceversa.

Femoids are lucky not to have artificial competition, because the bat cave and the womb dungeon is all of the value they still have.
 
Men are just worker bees, replaceable parts for global financial judaism/feminism.

Nothing short of collapse will solve it now.
 
>tfw you're born in a time where women are a commodity so you start listening to their opinions, make them not commodities and indirectly turn your male offspring into useless commodities instead
Children of satan
 
That's true, the second statement is the truth, while the first one is just overinflation of their value.

I think that femoids are still the commodities, but the cuckerment helped them to price themselves out of average man's purchasing range. After all, it's men who buy women, not viceversa.

Femoids are lucky not to have artificial competition, because the bat cave and the womb dungeon is all of the value they still have.
No men dont select women, women sepect men. A man's wealth just means he has a higher chance of being selected, as if he was better quality food on the shelf. Thats why men are products in the sexual market.
 
I made a similar point in my own thread, but to trust an organized central authority is not a good way to deal with it. The motivations are to be incentivized by small groupings rather than a large central power, because bureaucracy is inherently complex and inefficient, it would supply normies not incels because they make up the largest proportion of society, chads and incels will be left out. Chads will do fine on their own, and incels will again be left with nothing. You can move towards complete sexual liberation or complete puritan policies but not both.
 
I made a similar point in my own thread, but to trust an organized central authority is not a good way to deal with it. The motivations are to be incentivized by small groupings rather than a large central power, because bureaucracy is inherently complex and inefficient, it would supply normies not incels because they make up the largest proportion of society, chads and incels will be left out. Chads will do fine on their own, and incels will again be left with nothing. You can move towards complete sexual liberation or complete puritan policies but not both.
These small groupings wouldnt have the power to mold society so that its more just towards men, because they would be too weak and scattered. The only way is for them to unite into a central authority. Also Most policies(strict looksmatch based dating pool, racemixing being banned, etc.) that would be imposed wouldnt hurt normie men, and as long as they stop getting fed feminist propaganda, they would support them(if the 80/20 rule is true at least). Only nymphomaniac chads and guys with unrealistics standards would suffer.
 
These small groupings wouldnt have the power to mold society so that its more just towards men, because they would be too weak and scattered. The only way is for them to unite into a central authority. Also Most policies(strict looksmatch based dating pool, racemixing being banned, etc.) that would be imposed wouldnt hurt normie men, and as long as they stop getting fed feminist propaganda, they would support them(if the 80/20 rule is true at least). Only nymphomaniac chads and guys with unrealistics standards would suffer.
You didn't reply to the point I made. A central authority would tend to the needs of the many aka normies not incels. They will hurt outliers like chads and incels, chad will not be hurt, you will pay more taxes for a globalized sex regulations yet you have no way to even describe how it would work aside from whistful thinking. How do you prevent race mixing? How do you force looks matching?
 
You didn't reply to the point I made. A central authority would tend to the needs of the many aka normies not incels. They will hurt outliers like chads and incels, chad will not be hurt, you will pay more taxes for a globalized sex regulations yet you have no way to even describe how it would work aside from whistful thinking. How do you prevent race mixing? How do you force looks matching?
Yet according to the 80/20 rule, normies suffer too from a devalued sexual market, so in theory they should support it. Chad will be hurt because he wouldnt have a limitless sex pool.


How do you prevent race mixing? How do you force looks matching?
By enacting harsh punishment and propagating values that make it taboo.
 
Yet according to the 80/20 rule, normies suffer too from a devalued sexual market, so in theory they should support it. Chad will be hurt because he wouldnt have a limitless sex pool.



By enacting harsh punishment and propagating values that make it taboo.
80/20 applies both ways. Now you are spending 80% effort for the 20% of incels. There is no way this would pass.
 
Whats your solution?
Well the easiest one for sex is escortcel or buy sex doll. For love, there is no solution. You cannot buy love. In OT I made a thread called Love is a four letter word which explains it
 
we should live in a society where adultery is punished by burning at the stake
 
Well the easiest one for sex is escortcel or buy sex doll. For love, there is no solution. You cannot buy love. In OT I made a thread called Love is a four letter word which explains it
Thats current society. I want free sex. We should create a government that forces women to have free sex with us.
80/20 applies both ways. Now you are spending 80% effort for the 20% of incels. There is no way this would pass.
It would if incels took over society. Youre a fucking cuck for caring if sexual redistribution will inconvenience chad and foids. These scum shouldnt be negotiated with.
 
Thats current society. I want free sex. We should create a government that forces women to have free sex with us.

It would if incels took over society. Youre a fucking cuck for caring if sexual redistribution will inconvenience chad and foids. These scum shouldnt be negotiated with.
How will they force women for free?
 
Through the threat of social alienation, violence, and cutting benefits for them.
And what benefit would they have to stay in such a country?
 
And what benefit would they have to stay in such a country?
1. Women are naturally submissive to whoever controls society
2. They would be too poor to travel and would need to depend on their incel mates
3. If those 2 things fail, restrict their freedom of movement.
 
Uncontrolled immigration has allowed men who racially mog(whites in asia, arabs and tyrone in europe) the men in their host country to reduce reduce the value of the local men(asian men in asia, white men in europe).
LOL what?
 
1. Women are naturally submissive to whoever controls society
2. They would be too poor to travel and would need to depend on their incel mates
3. If those 2 things fail, restrict their freedom of movement.
So they can't walk out of the country and you expect them to vote for this?
 
Tfw you're the actual victim of objectification
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top