If you had sex with non escort you are NOT an incel.
Most betabuxx get sex so NO they are not incel.
Is that hard to understand?
Actually YES this is hard to understand.
Betabux is effectively the same as escortmax. It's prostitution/whoring either way. It's just technicalities.
Functionalyl what is the difference? Foid is only fucking you because of the copious resource transfer in her direction.
How the fuck is it that we would rate betabuxxers more highly ("less incel") as escortmaxers simply because they somehow manage to be bluepilled about the prostitute-like relationship they have with their "girlfriend" who is probably cucking them every time their back is turned.
If anything the escortcel is actually BETTER OFF because he is aware of the nature of this relationship.
Fakecels can't fuck 24/7. This forum is more of a side hobby for them.
Is this actually a hobby we realistically expect sex-havers to be engaged in though?
I feel like we're stretching out imaginations here to include a non-confirmable oddity.
We think most betabuxers are like Slaves , nope doesn't happen like that, they fuck and cuddle and do all sorts of intimate things. Atleast during the initial stages of the marriage.
Escortcels fuck/cuddle too though.
Also if that's true than a normie relationship is also "long term escortceling" so according to you a sexhaver normie should be allowed here ?
Honestly it feels like a matter of degrees to me.
If you're TECHNICALLY an escortcel but for some reason you barely have to pay the escort (like only 10 bucks to fuck her) I'd begin to question if it's legitimately escortcel at all or if the foid probably would fuck you anyway and just has this as windowdressing.
The quantity of resource transfer matters for normy/betabux too. For example is it paltry amounts or huge ones?
Also, to me you sound like a fucking fakecel, I'm sure you are one of those "I had kiss and blowjob when I was young but I'm not chad so I'm an incel guys"
The general usage is 1 year unable to get sex, not forever unable to be kissed.
If you want to redefine incel from teh general usage I'd make up a new term for it.
Fakecels like you are exploiting the loopholes of this forum.
It's not incels.co anymore,
Normies.co
One day we will wake up and realize...
incel is the new norm.
Maybe it already is.
@Diocel you wanted my opinions right?
Here it is: Every third guy is like LastGerman, normies, 5-6 in looks who had relationships in their past. But since they are not David Gandy level of looks so they are ldaring here, they think it's chad or nothing. Guys like him should be banned for good. I'm sick of this bullshit.
This isn't that far off from the reality.
Some people may thnk that way, but I think more often why they would want to hang isn't that they beleive in such absolute bleakness but rather in just an overwhelming bleakness that makes it such pathetic low-odds for low-chads that they'd rather commiserate here.
nobody is a "Looser" because this word doesn't exist
Therefore we cannot but infer that they did not understand the promise of their Lord as uttered in a sense at variance with the established forms of language, as conveying the doctrine which the clerical binders and
loosers of later ages teach.
