We incels have an aristocratic soul

[Over4Mexicels]

Most of incels in the past would have been philosophers, historians, scribes, mathematicians and military men.

We would be notable men, while most Foids and normies would be peasents living in mud. Chads would be kings relying on our astronomical knowledge of the world.

That most of us hold higher ideals is just evidence that in the past we were part of the aristocracy. Its not our fault that degeneration took over and our ancestors werent able to maintain their physical vigor and appearance. Or that they decided to defile their racial purity.

I think this is also why we detest mass driven politics such as democracy and socialism.

 

[Deleted member 10531]

Nah, why do all of you people think your looks and your IQ, or your political beliefs are related? Just a major cope

democracy and socialism.

Democracy and socialism are largely synonymous, JFL @ you false intellectuals

 

[jackwolfskin999]

Tbh if I was was in the 19th century I'd get by as a minor composer

 

[Over4Mexicels]

There's genetic memory. We are inclined to higher ideals such as anti-feminism, masculinity, anti-democracy because at some point in the past our ancestors also thought about these topics. Everything is genetics, even our political beliefs

 

[Over4Mexicels]

Very bold statement which I do not believe is correct.

mass driven movements such as democracy and socialism is what gave cucks and foids the power they now hold. If decisions were kept and made by very few aristocratic males, things wouldnt be so upside down. All these anti-aristocratic movements began by agitation starting with christianity and culminating with the french revolution-marxism

 

[PPEcel]

There's genetic memory. We are inclined to higher ideals such as anti-feminism, masculinity, anti-democracy because at some point in the past our ancestors also thought about these topics. Everything is genetics, even our political beliefs

This is just ridiculous.

At some point in our history, our ancestors shit and pissed on the streets. It doesn't mean we do that stuff anymore.

You don't understand what genetic memory is.

 

[Ignas]

Kek in the past I would be Jack the Ripper

 

[WizardofSoda]

Yes we can see by the policies of the monarchies in Europe, that aristocratic men had already thought through these questions. It wasn't by accident that our traditions & customs were the way they were.

 

[Over4Mexicels]

This is just ridiculous.

At some point in our history, our ancestors shit and pissed on the streets. It doesn't mean we do that stuff anymore.

You don't understand what genetic memory is.

Maybe yours did

Mine didnt

 

[FinnCel]

OP is right

 

[PPEcel]

Maybe yours did

Mine didnt

Flush toilets didn't exist until the 19th century.

 

[Over4Mexicels]

Flush toilets didn't exist until the 19th century.

There were already sewer systems in Rome. Even in the aztec empire. If they had to shit I think they'd be going to a shitting hole - shitting on the streets, that'd have been probably punished by the local authorities. Our ancestors werent that different from
Us. Unless we're talking about indian men.

 

[Deleted member 10531]

There's genetic memory. We are inclined to higher ideals such as anti-feminism, masculinity, anti-democracy because at some point in the past our ancestors also thought about these topics. Everything is genetics, even our political beliefs

Ugh, no, if this was the case, there would never be people who disagree politically with their parents, and that notion is extremely retarded not only because of that, but also, because concepts like feminism, masculinity and democracy are new concepts.

And in fact, in prehistoric tribes, it was the incels who supported democracy, as otherwise they would have no say in matters.

 

[ThirdWorldcel]

There were already sewer systems in Rome. Even in the aztec empire. If they had to shit I think they'd be going to a shitting hole - shitting on the streets, that'd have been probably punished by the local authorities. Our ancestors werent that different from
Us. Unless we're talking about indian men.

The Aztecs were Indians....American Indians that's it.

 

[Over4Mexicels]

Ugh, no, if this was the case, there would never be people who disagree politically with their parents, and that notion is extremely retarded not only because of that, but also, because concepts like feminism, masculinity and democracy are new concepts.

And in fact, in prehistoric tribes, it was the incels who supported democracy, as otherwise they would have no say in matters.

The only people disagreeing with their parents about politics are angry edgy che guevara supporters. The phase dies out when their mind clears after puberty. But from what I've seen, most families are apolitical or just avoid talking about political topics.

Feminism, democracy and any kind of mass movements are no new things. They have always been present in human history, but Christianity was the first pragmatic ideology that implemented these concepts on a cultural-political level, all under the disguise of being a religious movement. Rome fell due to Christianity, when the ruling class finally intermingled with the masses.

The Aztecs were Indians....American Indians that's it.

For all practical matters, prehispanic people aren't designted as indians in any racial, cultural or historical classification but as prehispanic people.

 

[Absolutezer0]

Most of incels in the past would have been philosophers, historians, scribes, mathematicians and military men.

We would be notable men, while most Foids and normies would be peasents living in mud. Chads would be kings relying on our astronomical knowledge of the world.

That most of us hold higher ideals is just evidence that in the past we were part of the aristocracy. Its not our fault that degeneration took over and our ancestors werent able to maintain their physical vigor and appearance. Or that they decided to defile their racial purity.

I think this is also why we detest mass driven politics such as democracy and socialism.

Cope

 

[WizardofSoda]

In physical terms naturally the peasantry is bred over generations to be robust, strong people. That was their role to do the manual labor in the society, which was more than 90% of jobs into the start of the 20th century.

Not surprisingly the peasantry mogs the hell out of us in physical terms. We were bred for many generations to be the cognitive elite of the nation, to be the 'thinkers'. Its not even that one is better than the other, just different roles in the society.

 

[needsolution]

Yeah i agree, i do have aristocratic soul

 

[Deleted member 10531]

The only people disagreeing with their parents about politics are angry edgy che guevara supporter

Yes because your average nazi is totally someone who "comes from nazi genes", and not just an edgy teenager who thinks posting on 4chan makes him part of an underground revolutionary movement. Your hypocrisy is shining through, pretending like che guavara supporters are the only ones who disagree with their parents. But even those people prove the stupidity of your argument, those people should then not exist. And they do. And they certainly are a large enough group for you to make such bold assertions of them.

Feminism, democracy and any kind of mass movements are no new things. They have always been present in human history, but Christianity was the first pragmatic ideology that implemented these concepts on a cultural-political level, all under the disguise of being a religious movement. Rome fell due to Christianity, when the ruling class finally intermingled with the masses.

Blaah. Human history itself is a new thing, the past 10000 years (not that any of those concepts are anywhere near that time), is an evolutionary blink of an eye, human history itself, in an evolutionary scale of time, is not just new, it is beyond new

 

[Cuyen]

Kek in the past I would be Jack the Ripper

 

[mcfroggy]

Lel what joke, I come from long line of poor farmers. Genetic memory is insignificant compared to nurture.

 

[Deleted member 18214]

Lel what joke, I come from long line of poor farmers. Genetic memory is insignificant compared to nurture.

 

[Dionysus]

OP is right

 

[Over4Mexicels]

Your hypocrisy is shining through

There's no hipocrisy in my statements. You're the one making such a big deal out of a scientifically-backed fact. There's nothing to discuss. We claim all our failures are due to genetics & genetics alone, but then, some flip their shit when we mention that political leanings are also determined by genetic markers.

http://edition.cnn.com/2008/HEALTH/02/11/politics.genes/index.html

https://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/09/...ur-genes-influence-our-political-beliefs.html

 

[Deleted member 20207]

“To live alone is the fate of all great souls” – Arthur Schopenhauer

Isaac Newton and Nikola Tesla, two of the greatest geniouses through the history, both died as lonely virgins. It says quite much about which men society value tbh.

 

[Deleted member 15752]

I think this is also why we detest mass driven politics such as democracy and socialism.

Imagine people calling you out for that statement, people just seem to enjoy their democratic and are probably NEET's fond of modern day socialism. I find it hard to not be right wing atleast being truly conservative in times like these, some people just enjoy their inceldom and dont want any higher chances of getting laid. Figure.

 

[Deleted member 16809]

Kek in the past I would be Jack the Ripper

 

[andinocel]

I’m the weird guy that no foid wants to date and few guys want to be friends with, but I often find that I’m answering people’s questions on almost every topic.

When I’m by myself ruminating on life, I always think that if I were alive in the past I’d either be a scribe, alchemist, Druid, or witch doctor

 

[Deleted member 19236]

Tbh, the two greatest revolutions of mankind were caused because of the imcompetence of the Ruling Class at time which proves that they were not that great or divine. (French Revolution and Russian Revolution)

 

[Uther]

There might be some truth to this. Just look at portraits of aristocrats from middle ages onwards. Most would be considered incel by todays standards. Actually it seems the focus on male physicality as his sole value is a peasant value.

 

[Lux]

THE TRUE ARISTOCRACY IS WHAT I HAVE PREACHING AND PROPAGATING, TO WHICH I BEGAN, THE ARISTOCRACY OF THE EXTRAORDINARIES! There is no "genetic memory", there is a taste, an exquisiteness, a joviality and a free spirit that moves the aristocrat IN SPIRIT, there is no need for a genetic prerequisite, but a predisposition to the Ideal and the style of life. Aristocratic life; I wrote several posts about how ARISTOCRACY is the only solution, the only way that will give rise to a new phenomenon LIFE and the pathos of distance: But it's no use, it's bound to be forgotten, it's the end, passivity and denial of enlightenment gave way to pitch and vacuum; a kingdom should be made from hell, but who will join the bringer of the dawn?

 

[Insomniac]

Very bold statement which I do not believe is correct.

t. male feminist

 

[Deleted member 19756]

Prostitution with young foids was legal in the 19th century.

I probably would've gotten syphilis like Nietzsche.

 

[Phallusy]

Fuck the soul, give me an aristocratic lifestyle

 

[NoCopeNoHope]

Tbh, the two greatest revolutions of mankind were caused because of the imcompetence of the Ruling Class at time which proves that they were not that great or divine. (French Revolution and Russian Revolution)

I wouldn't consider minor political squabbles funded by competing elites "revolutions".

More important would be the founding of Chinese, Assyrian, Greek, Roman, Mayan, and Incan civilizations. All of which were founded and ran by aristocratic elites.

But the ruling class being monumental failures has always lead to the downfall of their soceities. Inceldom is largely a modern problem caused by the female mind not being able to cope with modern technology.

 

[Teutonic Knight]

Chads would be kings relying on our astronomical knowledge of the world.

Why the hell would Chads be kings? Most kings in history were ugly, like really ugly. Just look at the Habsburgs.

 

[Sparrow's Song]

mass driven movements such as democracy and socialism is what gave cucks and foids the power they now hold. If decisions were kept and made by very few aristocratic males, things wouldnt be so upside down. All these anti-aristocratic movements began by agitation starting with christianity and culminating with the french revolution-marxism

We don't have socialism, we have femisocialism, notice how we don't have free healthcare or free facial surgery but any foid who gets knocked up by chad or tyrone doesn't need to sue for child support (they are all sharing the chads so that would but chad in jail and make it harder for him to be used as a breeder) so they just act like they don't know the father and the state pays for their offspring... There are no benefits for men, there is no healing for men, there is no society that helps men, there is no future for ugly men... Nothing is egalitarian about the feminist version of socialism.

 

[Over4Mexicels]

We don't have socialism, we have femisocialism, notice how we don't have free healthcare or free facial surgery but any foid who gets knocked up by chad or tyrone doesn't need to sue for child support (they are all sharing the chads so that would but chad in jail and make it harder for him to be used as a breeder) so they just act like they don't know the father and the state pays for their offspring... There are no benefits for men, there is no healing for men, there is no society that helps men, there is no future for ugly men... Nothing is egalitarian about the feminist version of socialism.

As any mass-movement, lead by emotions of world utopias & sweet egalitarian lullabies instead of cold hard logic based on nature, Socialism-marxism has always been feminist

Engels was an ardent proponent of liberating foids

Engels (1884) argues that a woman's subordination is not a natural result of her biological disposition but of social relations established around the female sex's reproductive capacity. Men's efforts to achieve their demands for control of women's labor and sexual faculties have taken different forms depending on the wider socio-economic system of production, and under modern capitalism has become institutionalized in the nuclear family. Through a Marxist historical perspective, Engels (1884) analyzes the widespread social phenomena associated with female sexual morality, such as fixation on virginity and sexual purity, incrimination and violent punishment of women who commit adultery, and demands that women be submissive to their husbands. Ultimately, Engels traces these phenomena to the recent development of exclusive control of private property by the patriarchs of the rising slaveowner class in the ancient mode of production, and the attendant desire to ensure that their inheritance is passed only to their own offspring: chastity and fidelity are rewarded, says Engels (1884), because they guarantee exclusive access to the sexual and reproductive faculty of women possessed by men from the property-owning class.

As such, gender oppression is closely related to class oppression and the relationship between men and women in society is similar to the relations between proletariat and bourgeoisie

Wikipedia

And thus, when the socialists finally got to establish their "workers paradise", they follow through these principles

At the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century, the focus of Russian feminism shifted from the aristocracy to the peasants and working class. Imbued with socialist ideology, young women began to organize all-women unions among female factory workers, who tended to be ignored or marginalized by male socialists.[12]

Between 1907 and 1917, the League for Women's Equal Rights was the most important feminist organization in Russia. Like the Russian Women's Mutual Philanthropic Society, it was focused on education and social welfare, but it also pushed for equal rights for women, including suffrage, equal inheritance, and an end to passport restrictions. The 1917 Revolution, catalyzed in part by women workers' demonstrations, generated a surge of membership in the organization. In the same year, because of the society's continued lobbying, Russia became the first major world power to grant women the right to vote

 

[Sparrow's Song]

As any mass-movement, lead by emotions instead of cold hard logic, Socialism-marxism has always been feminist

Engels was an ardent proponent of liberating foids



Wikipedia

And thus, when the socialists finally got to establish their "workers paradise", they follow through these principles

Engels was such a cuck... Now the all femoids are bourgeoisie and the bourgeoisie chads have a monopoly on the femoids while the proletariat incels and normie men are enslaved to a society that offers them no future of value, doomed to die alone or submit to betabux cuckoldry. Feminist socialism is sexual rogue capitalism.

 

[Deleted member 10531]

claim all our failures are due to genetics & genetics alone, but then,

Only a retard would claim that all our failures are due to genetics

http://edition.cnn.com/2008/HEALTH/02/11/politics.genes/index.html

https://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/09/...ur-genes-influence-our-political-beliefs.html

That doesn't prove anything, only that certain personality traits are linked with genetics, but that doesn't prove that your political beliefs are directly formed by your genes, that's just stupid, and if that would be the case, then there could have never been any new political movements, like feminism.



And I also like how you ignored the rest of my post and focused only on few works.

 

[Romello Gaghan 2]

Ah, yes. We are the supreme gentlemen, indeed indeed.
Here here

 

[Kirito3]

This is just ridiculous.

At some point in our history, our ancestors shit and pissed on the streets. It doesn't mean we do that stuff anymore.

You don't understand what genetic memory is.

Tell that to india

 

[Deleted member 17419]

Cope of the year.