Add national-conservatism, imperialism and anti-judeomasonic stance and voila - it's perfect. 
We have to take all the good things from socialism dropping all the (((bad ones))).
Free pussy for incels and no landwhales? I'm in
I
Are you Authoritarian?
W
Ya in national socialism/social credit we keep all the good things that work with socialism. In fact today socialism is 100% needed to get money to everybody across America to drive the economy through demand.
Also to buildout the infrastructure of a nation and run it for everybody the state has to do it or at least finance it through regulated monopolies.
Then there is $100's of billions a year we can spend on basic science research of all kinds.
At the same time I am pretty radically free market and enterprise. The powers that be try to divide everyone into extremes. Or create false dichotomies.
One false dichotomy is that capitalism and socialism are against each other.. socialism needs the massive and ever growing production of capitalism to tax a percentage of the surplus production. And capitalism relies on the state.. and today capitalism needs people with money to spend.
Also to buildout the infrastructure of a nation and run it for everybody the state has to do it or at least finance it through regulated monopolies.
Then there is $100's of billions a year we can spend on basic science research of all kinds.
At the same time I am pretty radically free market and enterprise. The powers that be try to divide everyone into extremes. Or create false dichotomies.
One false dichotomy is that capitalism and socialism are against each other.. socialism needs the massive and ever growing production of capitalism to tax a percentage of the surplus production. And capitalism relies on the state.. and today capitalism needs people with money to spend.
Exactly. This is why i find the scandinavian economical model of the state controlling large parts of strategic economical infrastructures to be a briliant model. And of course, the good social policy that comes as a result of this. We need to use capitalism's capacity to build an economically just and social state. With a fascist ideology of course.
Last edited:
I
Ideologically i'm fascist and economically i like the scandinavian model
Here's where I am. The Scandinavian model sounds nice ngl.
Lib
Here's where I am.
I
Only socially, I'm ok with Capitalism, economically speaking.Lib
I
This is how people with different ideological beliefs should act. Each other respects and understand their differences.
Yep. And after all our current biggest problem is inceldom
Also i have to add that i very dislike the personality cult part of all totalitarian ideologies btw. When i say fascism i generally mean a stance against jews, degeneracy, cultural marxism etc. As for the political system, i support a rule of a coalition of parties with similar stances where all other parties are either banned or isolated. I don't support any extreme policies tho, and am against fascism's cult of the youth, the nation etc. I'm more like a national-conservative type of guy.
Last edited:
I
ExactlyYep. And after all our current biggest problem is inceldom
W
Ya they've got the best. Something not widely known in America is Scandinavia also has radically open free markets. Like they are in the top 10 countries for measures of how easy it is to start a business, get a license, property rights. They have mega corporations too and $billionaires.
The state can control stuff like water companies, electric utilities, roads that kind of thing. And in fascism say the state is having trouble running parts of it, it can contract out to the marketplace, unlike in communism. But still keep ownership.
Eg.. in Britain after WWII there was not enough houses for everybody. So the state was building 250,000 houses a year. Of course it was doing it through private companies building the houses and utilities for the houses. Then before long they had millions of public houses for people who couldn't afford a house. And they contracted maintenance out to private enterprise as well.
In pure capitalism what happens is a poor person can't afford a house. And a house builder they have no job if the poor person can't afford to pay them.
Exactly. Very well said.
B
fucking basedIdeologically i'm fascist and economically i like the scandinavian model
D
partner
and niggersYep. And after all our current biggest problem is inceldom
partner
I don't mind asians (esp. chinese waifusand niggers
) but niggers are poinless subhumans indeed
Why so anti Jew? We can make or break a country’s economy.Add national-conservatism, imperialism and anti-judeomasonic stance and voila - it's perfect.
Here's where I am. The Scandinavian model sounds nice ngl.
Lol Libertarian, Cucked
One wonders whether he's making an argument or a threat.
Add national-conservatism, imperialism and anti-judeomasonic stance and voila - it's perfect.
Yeah sure, National Socialism is what we need.
When I talk to normies I just refer to myself as "Centrist Authoritarian" as a mask.
Last edited:
Nice larp
I'll consider labeling myself as a supporter of authoritarian democracy
Totalitarian democracy - Wikipedia
Fascist movements advocate a form of democracy that advocates the rule of the most qualified, rather than rule by a majority of numbers.[12]
Maurice Barrès, who greatly influenced the policies of fascism, claimed that true democracy was authoritarian democracy while rejecting liberal democracy as a fraud.[13]
Germany's propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels described Nazism as an "authoritarian democracy" on 31 May 1933 in a speech before the press.
Similar threads
weaselbomber
Users who are viewing this thread
