Serious We HAVE TO put a stop to online dating

[theson]

This discussion is inspired by @RopeMaXXer's thread. My theory is that since the right wing is gaining political momentum right now, we can use them as a proxy to push for a ban on online dating. We should simply use right wing arguments about why online dating is harmful, like that it spreads STIs and discourages people from marrying (the "where have all the good men gone?" argument). We need to spread anti-online dating rhetoric all over places like reddit and /pol/ but make sure to disguise it so that it's not framed using blackpill/incel language or else it will immediately get called out and ignored by white knights.

 

[Uglyethnicrat]

The right wing will cancel neetbux and tell you to man up bucko

 

[Deleted member 20811]

Based and high IQ idea, but it will never be put into place. Cucks wont allow it

 

[vodkacel]

Sounds good does not work.
1. Online dating = LARGE Jewish business
2. No one gives a shit what incels say, even if we have top arguments

 

[RemoveNormalfags]

Based and true, I also think right wing politics have a chance to end feminism and this gender bullshit.

 

[RopeMaXXer]

Won't help. Won't happen. Players that have stake in this have too much momentum at this point. Rewind the clock by 10 years and maybe you can do something.
Ted was right. Just being able to see everything that's happening across the globe ruins alot of things.

 

[Deleted member 21883]

All politicians are sexhavers.

 

[AlexanderTheGreat11]

Too late man.

Just ldar

 

[CopingJim]

Nothing you do will make foids find sub5s attractive or even settle with them, except disallowing women to work. That way tey will be forced to marry a betabuxxer. That's the only reason sub5 men weren't always incels, their foids were financially dependent on them, that's it.

 

[theson]

All politicians are sexhavers.

That is why we need to frame it in cuckservative boomer language. Say that online dating platforms allow men to have so much casual sex that they have no incentive to commit and it hurts women. Use their own weapon against them and frame women as victims of a "marriage crisis" to get tinder/bumble/POF/OkC etc banned.

 

[zangano1]

We should just remove female rights while we are at it tbh

 

[Fat Link]

The right wing will cancel neetbux and tell you to man up bucko

This.

Although if a real Republican party actually existed (instead of the Jew controlled cucks we have now) the Stacies would suffer too with them in power.

Maybe not to "The Handmaid's Tale" levels but feminism would certainly be defanged as well fag/transgender bathroom rights would end ie specifically wherever its been implemented into law to allow them to use women's bathroom's when they still possess male genitalia.

 

[Deleted member 21883]

That is why we need to frame it in cuckservative boomer language. Say that online dating platforms allow men to have so much casual sex that they have no incentive to commit and it hurts women. Use their own weapon against them and frame women as victims of a "marriage crisis" to get tinder/bumble/POF/OkC etc banned.

Boomers are neoliberal retards, so they would pass a law that only widowed people are allowed to get married. Makes sense if you refuse to hire anybody for the past 3 years and then complain you can't find anybody with 3-years experience.

 

[Deleted member 1060]

JFL @ thinking that banning online dating app is gonna fix everything.

Western women are promiscuous, dick-riding, dog-fucking whores. Either they are left or right.

If left-wing, they will mostly ride white chads, sometimes a little sprinkle of ethnic chad-dicks just for the sake of their "change in taste" and for political correctness. If they are right-wing, they will only ride white chad-dicks.

None of them will ever touch these men with a 10 feet pole:

You demolished patriarchy and unleashed your women with an excuse of so called "modernism" and "progress" and they turned into senseless dick-riding whores devoid of any decency and family values.

This is not "progress" per se, nudity, promiscuity and bacchanalia is ancient as human civilization itself.

You need to fix that.

 

[grondilu]

You got it all wrong. We need to do the opposite, martial arts style.

When confronted to a physically stronger opponent, it is hopeless to try to stop his movements directly. Instead, one must accompany his motion and try to direct its momentum towards an unstable position.

I say create a free and open source app that would make hooking up as easy and efficient as possible.

That will cuck the normies and hopefully infuriate them enough to wake them up.

 

[AmIjustDreaming]

The right wing will cancel neetbux and tell you to man up bucko

Exactly this. I'm fighting so hard with a VERY good case. I live in a red state. It's fucking hell.

 

[theson]

You got it all wrong. We need to do the opposite, martial arts style.

When confronted to a physically stronger opponent, it is hopeless to try to stop his movements directly. Instead, one must accompany his motion and try to direct its momentum towards an unstable position.

I say create a free and open source app that would make hooking up as easy and efficient as possible.

That will cuck the normies and hopefully infuriate them enough to wake them up.

This is called accelerationism.

 

[grondilu]

This is called accelerationism.

Well, I'm fine with this doctrine.

Some ideas are so popular that the only way to change people's mind about them seems to be to let them implement them and see for themselves how it's fucked up.

Female freedom and sexual liberty is hard to oppose on a moral ground. Religions didn't even try, they relied on divine authority : this is bad because God said so.

Now that God is dead, people won't understand the reasons behind the religious dogmas until they see what happens when they ignore them.

 

[jerrycan dan]

Hey I want you to check out this manifesto.

Google Industrial Society and Its Future and just check it out.

Industrial Society and Its Future.

 

[Carotel]

You are right, but it won't happen

 

[theson]

Well, I'm fine with this doctrine.

Some ideas are so popular that the only way to change people's mind about them seems to be to let them implement them and see for themselves how it's fucked up.

Female freedom and sexual liberty is hard to oppose on a moral ground. Religions didn't even try, they relied on divine authority : this is bad because God said so.

Now that God is dead, people won't understand the reasons behind the religious dogmas until they see what happens when they ignore them.

I have considered acceleration myself but I don't believe women's rights will ever be reversed. The cat was out of the bag when they got the vote. As long as democracy endures in the West (ie the government doesn't collapse in some apocalyptic scenario) nothing will change. The majority of men are too brainwashed to follow their own interests.

 

[Emba]

Sounds good does not work.
1. Online dating = LARGE Jewish business
2. No one gives a shit what incels say, even if we have top arguments

[email protected]

 

[BrapZilian]

It OBVIOUSLY has to stop, but the question is how?

 

[Mystic]

Hey I want you to check out this manifesto.

Google Industrial Society and Its Future and just check it out.

Industrial Society and Its Future.

Great read.

 

[LOLI BREEDING]

You got it all wrong. We need to do the opposite, martial arts style.

When confronted to a physically stronger opponent, it is hopeless to try to stop his movements directly. Instead, one must accompany his motion and try to direct its momentum towards an unstable position.

I say create a free and open source app that would make hooking up as easy and efficient as possible.

That will cuck the normies and hopefully infuriate them enough to wake them up.

it isn't technology that enabled tinder. it is culture and acceptance. dating sites have existed since forever. but none had the media backup that tinder had. it was considered weird/desperate/last resort. and normies are already cucked, they just need some time to realize it because they're slow

It OBVIOUSLY has to stop, but the question is how?

for two thousand years, we haven't come up with anything better than religion to solve this problem. we know a lot more now, but I have a feeling that our gadgets and science won't help us for a while. it will take at least 200 years to completely replace the femoid technologically

 

[Deleted member 19546]

All politicians are sexhavers.

 

[Vermilioncore]

Based and true, I also think right wing politics have a chance to end feminism and this gender bullshit.

Yeah I think so too bro

 

[Antorian]

The only hope is for women's rights and feminism to be banned. Otherwise it will only get worse.

 

[Deleted member 18435]

Based and high IQ idea, but it will never be put into place. Cucks wont allow it

 

[BrapZilian]

it isn't technology that enabled tinder. it is culture and acceptance. dating sites have existed since forever. but none had the media backup that tinder had. it was considered weird/desperate/last resort. and normies are already cucked, they just need some time to realize it because they're slow

for two thousand years, we haven't come up with anything better than religion to solve this problem. we know a lot more now, but I have a feeling that our gadgets and science won't help us for a while. it will take at least 200 years to completely replace the femoid technologically

It seems sharia law needs to be applied.

 

[Dionysus]

Too late man.

Just ldar

 

[Deleted member 22549]

We need to spread anti-online dating rhetoric all over places like reddit and /pol/ but make sure to disguise it so that it's not framed using blackpill/incel language or else it will immediately get called out and ignored by white knights.

You know what's funny? Online dating was made for people like us, who couldn't get a partner IRL. The peak time to meet a girl on the internet came and went before we ever knew what we were losing, even nowadays most of the profits of those sites come from below average men. What we need to do is push the bluepilled idea that "Tinder isn't real life" to drive away the below average men, who are the primary income source of those dating sites, therefore breaking them.

 

[azakhan]

Only way to do that would be destroying all technology. They would never allow such ban in any 1st world country.

 

[YME]

good luck with that

 

[Monk of Failure]

Banning online dating won't be that effective.

 

[KingChemist]

Good luck with that. It's never going to work.

 

[Player]

You just want to shut down the thing which enables true human nature. It is huge cope.

 

[dragonbro]

My kind of thread.

Tinder should limit the number of matches you can have before you can swipe. If you already have , say 10, you have to unmatch before you can get new matches. Governement should step in here and create regulation.

Also, we should make more efforts in "poisoning the well" not just for dating apps but social media as a whole. My little project is really just a way to ruin social media as a whole but it's not taking off like I hoped it would.

 

[SlayerSlayer]

With technology, it's always a case of the cat being out of the bag. It will never work in a regressive way, unless something extremely violent happened. Online dating will only continue, becoming increasingly lookist, and the meek will continue to perpetually suffer. Some of us will luck out when a random ho chooses us, some might score meaninglessly for one night, and then spend the rest of their life as an incel. This is just simple supply and demand. Why the fuck would a woman want anything to do with us, or children? The fleshlights we have are pathetic compared to the advanced rotating vibrators they have. Hell, what bitch needs a vibrator, when you have CHAD on TINDER. Why have a baby when you can have a fur baby? Real friends, and Netflix too.

The trend of the future is one of transience.

My kind of thread.

Tinder should limit the number of matches you can have before you can swipe. If you already have , say 10, you have to unmatch before you can get new matches. Governement should step in here and create regulation.

Also, we should make more efforts in "poisoning the well" not just for dating apps but social media as a whole. My little project is really just a way to ruin social media as a whole but it's not taking off like I hoped it would.

I wonder how many incels actually chadfish? We are mostly a bunch of good little boys, IT . . . there's probably no more than a dozen. If we made a regimented effort to Chadfish, it would do a lot to curb the hypergamy, at least online. It may have the unintended effect of making women grabby at Chad IRL.

 

[Subhuman Currycel]

The damage is done and irreversible just like (((they))) wanted it.

 

[The Incel Decade]

This discussion is inspired by @RopeMaXXer's thread. My theory is that since the right wing is gaining political momentum right now, we can use them as a proxy to push for a ban on online dating. We should simply use right wing arguments about why online dating is harmful, like that it spreads STIs and discourages people from marrying (the "where have all the good men gone?" argument). We need to spread anti-online dating rhetoric all over places like reddit and /pol/ but make sure to disguise it so that it's not framed using blackpill/incel language or else it will immediately get called out and ignored by white knights.

Would never get past the Jewish lobby. Same with any clampdown on porn