And that is revealing the nature of women. Conservatives believe women act this way because feminism has ruined them. Partly true. However, what feminism truly did was liberate women to act on their impulses and desires as they please. No wonder feminists named their movement the "Sexual Liberation Movement". Hint: the word liberation means women's nature was being outraged by society's traditions. They "liberated" themselves in that sense.
Beta men, the kind of men whose only value could ever be money and status, had a fair share of traditional women for so long that it clouded their perception of women. Many of them seriously believed women are not sexual and like men only for what they can provide. If you ask men from an older generation how to be desirable for women, their answer is always the same: resources. These men are oblivious to what genuinely causes women to have a burning desire for men.
And what causes this burning desire is, as we have known for a while, physical beauty. Face, height, physique, and race to an extent. Not money and status. But how could men from that generation have realized this if they never faced so brutal a discrimination based on their physical beauty or lack thereof? In their minds, women liked them because they were providers and protectors.
If you watch Chris Rock's stand-up comedy, he jokes about how women are definitely going to leave their husbands if they ever lose their jobs, like this knowledge about women only enjoying men's company for their source of wealth is an uncomfortable truth for men to embrace. In reality, it may be hard to embrace this reality if your only value is money, perhaps status, and nothing else.
And this is the beauty of feminism. By leveling the financial playing field for both genders, it showed the entire world that women do not have beta men with resources as their first choice when they stop depending on them for sustenance. Now that women can sustain themselves, they are liberated (remember?) from beta men to go after the ones they genuinely desire: the most handsome men in their proximity. Or, as we nicknamed them, Chads.
This sounds like I am betraying my gender and siding with the enemies. Think about it for a minute, though: Beta men, who are providers and protectors of women, also have an ego. And this ego is what nourishes their perception of being "real men". In their ignorant minds, the reason we fail to get women is not because of physical and mental flaws; no, the reason is that we are not "real men". We have no worth in their eyes. This "worth" is betabuxing women that have given their best years to handsome men, of course.
It gives me satisfaction to know the same men that hold themselves in high regard for landing women in a time when they depended on men for sustenance are the ones that would be incapable of landing the same women now and could even be posting here.
No, mister betabuxer, you are not a real man for having a beautiful wife that you could only get in a time when she depended on you for resources! If she had the money to sustain herself back then, she would never have chosen some average guy like you. If you and her were born in this generation and used Tinder, she would swipe left on you in the blink of an eye and swipe right on Chad in a heartbeat.
So, despite the hate it gets, feminism has thrown light on who the real desired men are. Only we acknowledge this at the moment, but more people are starting to notice it. The beta men had their fun pretending their resources made women desire them. In reality, their resources made women use these men for sustenance. To women, the real desirable men are the ones with aesthetic value.
Beta men, the kind of men whose only value could ever be money and status, had a fair share of traditional women for so long that it clouded their perception of women. Many of them seriously believed women are not sexual and like men only for what they can provide. If you ask men from an older generation how to be desirable for women, their answer is always the same: resources. These men are oblivious to what genuinely causes women to have a burning desire for men.
And what causes this burning desire is, as we have known for a while, physical beauty. Face, height, physique, and race to an extent. Not money and status. But how could men from that generation have realized this if they never faced so brutal a discrimination based on their physical beauty or lack thereof? In their minds, women liked them because they were providers and protectors.
If you watch Chris Rock's stand-up comedy, he jokes about how women are definitely going to leave their husbands if they ever lose their jobs, like this knowledge about women only enjoying men's company for their source of wealth is an uncomfortable truth for men to embrace. In reality, it may be hard to embrace this reality if your only value is money, perhaps status, and nothing else.
And this is the beauty of feminism. By leveling the financial playing field for both genders, it showed the entire world that women do not have beta men with resources as their first choice when they stop depending on them for sustenance. Now that women can sustain themselves, they are liberated (remember?) from beta men to go after the ones they genuinely desire: the most handsome men in their proximity. Or, as we nicknamed them, Chads.
This sounds like I am betraying my gender and siding with the enemies. Think about it for a minute, though: Beta men, who are providers and protectors of women, also have an ego. And this ego is what nourishes their perception of being "real men". In their ignorant minds, the reason we fail to get women is not because of physical and mental flaws; no, the reason is that we are not "real men". We have no worth in their eyes. This "worth" is betabuxing women that have given their best years to handsome men, of course.
It gives me satisfaction to know the same men that hold themselves in high regard for landing women in a time when they depended on men for sustenance are the ones that would be incapable of landing the same women now and could even be posting here.
No, mister betabuxer, you are not a real man for having a beautiful wife that you could only get in a time when she depended on you for resources! If she had the money to sustain herself back then, she would never have chosen some average guy like you. If you and her were born in this generation and used Tinder, she would swipe left on you in the blink of an eye and swipe right on Chad in a heartbeat.
So, despite the hate it gets, feminism has thrown light on who the real desired men are. Only we acknowledge this at the moment, but more people are starting to notice it. The beta men had their fun pretending their resources made women desire them. In reality, their resources made women use these men for sustenance. To women, the real desirable men are the ones with aesthetic value.
