I don’t mean in a blue-pulled “Looks aren’t the only thing that matters” sort of way, I mean that we cannot comprehend to what level of scrutiny women analyze men.
Us guys, while shallow at times, are very fair. If I see an attractive girl, be she white, black, Asian etc. will say she’s attractive. If she’s not morbidly obese and has a cute face, I’ll see her as a conventionally beautiful woman. This works for guys too (no homo). When non-blackpilled guys look at guys and see someone muscular, with good fashion sense, and maybe one or two inherent things like a jawline, they’ll say “Looking good bro”.
But the problem with women is that they’re the far more analytical of the two sexes. They’ll make a Renaissance-era anatomical map of the human face and body, and compare it to what they see before them. I’ve literally overheard conversations between girls picking apart facial features of guys who I saw as conventionally attractive. What’s worse,their standards are not only high, but their tastes are homogenous as well. I know for example, a bevy of guys who’re into Latino, Indian, and Asian women, for example, and there’s a lot of dissimilarities between those groups of women speaking aesthetically. We’re able to see the best in people, whereas women ask for cardboard cutouts of guys.
“But what about [insert Arabian/Persian or Bollywood guy here]? He’s not white but I find him attractive!”
The argument here was never, as I now realize, about race or creed so much as it was what’s endemic to different races. Whites can be incel, don’t mishear me, and I’d be a retard to discredit your issues because of some muh SEA. But there are traits endemic to the white phenotype that all girls find attractive. Sharp nose, fair skin, proper facial symmetry with smaller features. This is present in more white men than men of other races, and the most attractive men of those races always have those features.
Tl:dr it’s over, basically
Us guys, while shallow at times, are very fair. If I see an attractive girl, be she white, black, Asian etc. will say she’s attractive. If she’s not morbidly obese and has a cute face, I’ll see her as a conventionally beautiful woman. This works for guys too (no homo). When non-blackpilled guys look at guys and see someone muscular, with good fashion sense, and maybe one or two inherent things like a jawline, they’ll say “Looking good bro”.
But the problem with women is that they’re the far more analytical of the two sexes. They’ll make a Renaissance-era anatomical map of the human face and body, and compare it to what they see before them. I’ve literally overheard conversations between girls picking apart facial features of guys who I saw as conventionally attractive. What’s worse,their standards are not only high, but their tastes are homogenous as well. I know for example, a bevy of guys who’re into Latino, Indian, and Asian women, for example, and there’s a lot of dissimilarities between those groups of women speaking aesthetically. We’re able to see the best in people, whereas women ask for cardboard cutouts of guys.
“But what about [insert Arabian/Persian or Bollywood guy here]? He’s not white but I find him attractive!”
The argument here was never, as I now realize, about race or creed so much as it was what’s endemic to different races. Whites can be incel, don’t mishear me, and I’d be a retard to discredit your issues because of some muh SEA. But there are traits endemic to the white phenotype that all girls find attractive. Sharp nose, fair skin, proper facial symmetry with smaller features. This is present in more white men than men of other races, and the most attractive men of those races always have those features.
Tl:dr it’s over, basically
