Men and women do have preferences, what these may be would indicate what type of perspectives & considerations were taken into account in order to obtain the preference.
The preference would also display details of the own person/group's character.
Dogs, cats and camels have preferences too, having a preference would be thing A. The nature of said preference and what it implies would be thing B. Thing B is what would be the problem since, in regards of women, it displays the dysfunctional manner in which women tend to choose their partner and the manner in which they reject other potential candidates.
Holes don't select men the way men select holes. I recall seeing a graph about this not too long ago, in another thread. Consider 80/20.
1) Not all males are chad/chadlite. Harems are a thing. While not every single woman on earth may have the chance or be at a point in time to express certain attitudes regarding males, the quantity of women who go for the best looking male in an available pool should not be disregarded. Consider that there are also lesbians who supposedly don't prefer men yet with their choice damage the current dynamic between man & woman to the detriment of males. So even if they don't choose the chad of chads every single time, the way they clearly tend to go about it is still a problem for the average male.
2) The choices of others, considering magnitudes, can end up affecting your own experience under this sun. Consider that what comes around, goes around. In some instances, should sufficient people have a disregard for a social norm or something, change would then be seen. Thus, while others act based on their perspective, an individual may find itself reaping what others have sown. Mass whoredom DOES have negative consequences for the average male. If "it's their life" to whore around, it is my life to hate and be against the negativity that stems from it.
3) Consider noodles + whites and the general dynamic between these groups. It tends to be race-focused..
Some white holes call themselves snow bunnies, which is a clear indicative of a race focused dynamic.
1) Direct attacks are not the only negative approach one could have towards something. You can be shunned/excluded/avoided to name a few just for being a virgin. It doesn't need to get to the point of being attacked in public for it to be seen as a negative treatment, more so when one compares how holes treat other men they consider acceptable/desirable. Using "virgin" as an insult towards an individual's social behavior, over the status it actually means, indicates that the term was weaponized. So by using the term in that manner, it attacks virgins implying they are all socially misadapted/stunted/wrong etc.
2)Dick size and size in general matters, the big dick actually fucks the hole and is then considered a problem while the small dick isn't even given a chance most times and is also considered a negative trait/problem. To some men this could be irrelevant since they don't even get to the point of showing it regardless of size. Chad w. small dick != average male with big dick.
3) Picture a forest full of poisonous fruits, blooming all around. A squirrel says to another that it found some non poisoned fruit in a few branches whilst traveling. That second squirrel tells the squirrel community about the findings of squirrel 1. They rejoice. Afterwards a party is assembled, of squirrels to gather these fruits for the benefit of the squirrel people. They go to the poison forest, find snakes, boars and monkeys fighting for the fruits already, mere scraps are left. One squirrel of the party decides to turn back, it says: "the juice just isn't worth the squeeze, what a shitty forest" and then leaves..
