Serious Ways to combat feminism?

[TheScientist445446]

We all know that feminism is at the root of all problems, and that it's a totally unnecessary pointless thing, and that if it didn't exist society would be exactly the same if not better, and that it only benefits women.

But so what?? What are we actually going to do about it? What groups in society are actually trying to dismantle it not just temporarily, but for good? IS there some group I can join, some charity I can donate to, or something? I wanna help the cause

 

[Cryo]

First, the ones behind feminism are not women but the cuck males.

The cuck males are the ones who give power to women

 

[Cryo]

The white knight cucks are the ones who come to insult you and act as the voice of the woman. If you insult their queen they come to attack you. They are worker bees

 

[TheScientist445446]

First, the ones behind feminism are not women but the cuck males.

The cuck males are the ones who give power to women

true

 

[Claudius the God]

DROVES of men are withdrawing from society. Many men are realizing that if respect no longer guarantees reward, then respect is no longer guaranteed.

This society we're in, it's not sustainable. It will not last. Never in history have things been so unstable. Someone on here said that "feminism is a failed experiment". Very true.

I'm not sure if an organized group of our kind will emerge before the coming collapse, but collapse is coming.

Men are the bread and butter of society, and we have been ostracized immensely. All for the crime of love. More and more, day by day, men are checking out. And they're doing nothing to bring us back, to their own detriment.

 

[BlackPilledNormi]

Wait until society collapses under its own weight and hope that there will be enough left to build a new

 

[SmhChan]

DROVES of men are withdrawing from society. Many men are realizing that if respect no longer guarantees reward, then respect is no longer guaranteed.

This society we're in, it's not sustainable. It will not last. Never in history have things been so unstable. Someone on here said that "feminism is a failed experiment". Very true.

I'm not sure if an organized group of our kind will emerge before the coming collapse, but collapse is coming.

Men are the bread and butter of society, and we have been ostracized immensely. All for the crime of love. More and more, day by day, men are checking out. And they're doing nothing to bring us back, to their own detriment.

Naive take. Foids and elites aren't threatened by men dropping out of soyciety. They'd just tone it down a little and men would fall in line like the little cucks they are.

 

[Claudius the God]

Naive take. Foids and elites aren't threatened by men dropping out of soyciety.

It is a historical truth that having hordes of sexless men in your society will fuck things up.

They form bandit gangs, start raids, risk of government overthrow, rape, murder, and civil war.

They're threatened by men who have no stake in society's future. They have nothing to fight for, nothing to lose even.

They'd just tone it down a little and men would fall in line like the little cucks they are.

They won't, because they're fed up. This anger, this resentment and lack of purpose won't go away by merely placating us.

We're talking about deep, biological imperatives that are not being met, and therefore breeds resentemt and anger at a society that disenfranchises them. You can't even reason with it, or negotiate with it; it needs to be met where it is at.

So no, society can't do without us. Entire countries have been toppled over for far less (nazi germany, communist china, etc).

 

[LOLI BREEDING]

read this thread, grey

Male Separatism and Post-Female Society

I've been thinking about a few ideas related to the blackpill while I write my book. The blackpill itself can be boiled down into Genetic determinism Societal gynocentrsim We are all aware here of genetic determinism, so I will skip over that section. Societal gynocentrism is a far more...

incels.is

 

[cathuluelitist]

It is a historical truth that having hordes of sexless men in your society will fuck things up.

They form bandit gangs, start raids, risk of government overthrow, rape, murder, and civil war.

A civilization crumbles whenever it grants women the ability to vote and meta-rights since women are notoriously irresponsible with stuff like that and end up oppressing men, the people that gave them such rights in the first place. The West will eventually collapse very soon in fact because it is currently depleting its libidinal supplies. Well, civilization will eventually fall in my opinion but we're so low on libidinal reserves that we've sped up the fall of Pax Americana by 100 years at least and every civilization falls to zoism so that's just the addendum, and as we see with Adam and Eve, women will eventually crush the society no matter what the people do. It's inevitable. Normies whine about oil reserves while I whine about libidinal reserves, quite the contrast, the difference between some normie political pundit and a social revolutionary, I'm like yeah we will collapse to a bunch of high brow zipperheads and Whites will go extinct and merge into some sort of greater Eurasian race and they're whining about oil still

 

[Kan>Foids]

First, the ones behind feminism are not women but the cuck males.

The cuck males are the ones who give power to women

Exactly. The pussy whipped, pathetic, groveling, foid ass kissing males are the real problem. The little ants follow their queens without hesitation, questions, or mind of their own.

 

[Claudius the God]

A civilization crumbles whenever it grants women the ability to vote and meta-rights since women are notoriously irresponsible with stuff like that and end up oppressing men, the people that gave them such rights in the first place.

True, both of the things we're talking about are happening at the same time. Women have been given more rights, which as ultimately led to the alienation of good, honest men who have no stock in society.

 

[TheScientist445446]

read this thread, grey

Male Separatism and Post-Female Society

I've been thinking about a few ideas related to the blackpill while I write my book. The blackpill itself can be boiled down into Genetic determinism Societal gynocentrsim We are all aware here of genetic determinism, so I will skip over that section. Societal gynocentrism is a far more...

incels.is

thanks my guy

 

[SmhChan]

It is a historical truth that having hordes of sexless men in your society will fuck things up.

They form bandit gangs, start raids, risk of government overthrow, rape, murder, and civil war.

They're threatened by men who have no stake in society's future. They have nothing to fight for, nothing to lose even.

Male sexlessness has become the new baseline in the past century. It’s not a new phenomenon. Sure, we incels don’t get any sex, but men in relationships also barely do. I doubt male sexlessness would lead to a “violent revolution.” It'd have happened already. It’s the foid-worshipping dogma that is the actual issue.

You cannot overthrow modern govts by forming small revolutionary groups. You literally have nuclear-wielding superpower govts controlling the whole world with their gynocracy. They wouldn’t even need to use force. They would weaponize foid-worshipping men, which is a vast majority, to cause infighting. I mean, it already happens. Bluepillers, redpillers, blackpillers, MRAs- everyone’s just fighting with each other instead of curb-stomping foids’ socio-political agencies.

 

[Claudius the God]

It’s not a new phenomenon.

Nigga that's my point.

This is an observational truth in history; mass male sexlessness creates chaos, and it's only gotten worse in the past century because women have accrued more and more power for themselves.

Sure, we incels don’t get any sex, but men in relationships also barely do.

Those guys are cucks, they're not amongst us. They're not going to do anything because they'd rather appease the female goddess archetype of society than risk being called "misogynistic" or a "rapist".

I doubt male sexlessness would lead to a “violent revolution.” It’s the foid-worshipping dogma that is the actual issue.

It's more likely that it would lead to a collapse through passive withdrawal. The dogma, of course, is also an issue though.

You cannot overthrow modern govts by forming small revolutionary groups.

See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guerrilla_warfare

It only takes 3.5% of a given population to start a revolution.

You literally have nuclear-wielding superpower govts controlling the whole world with their gynocracy.

And this is not sustainable. It doesn't matter, what are they going to do nuke us?

They would weaponize foid-worshipping men, which is a vast majority, to cause.

How, exactly?

Men are becoming more and more politically separated from women, now. They have only gotten more conservative, as opposed to women who have gotten more liberal. There are more conservative men than cucked men, now.

I mean, it already happens. Bluepillers, redpillers, blackpillers, MRAs- everyone’s just fighting with each other instead of curb-stomping foids’ socio-political agencies.

This is true. This is why it's most likely going to be a collapse instigated from withdrawal than anything else.

 

[SmhChan]

Nigga that's my point.

This is an observational truth in history; mass male sexlessness creates chaos, and it's only gotten worse in the past century because women have accrued more and more power for themselves.

That's why I said, "It'd have happened already."

And this is not sustainable. It doesn't matter, what are they going to do nuke us?

It wasn't exactly about nukes, rather advanced weaponry.

See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guerrilla_warfare

It only takes 3.5% of a given population to start a revolution.

That is definitely a possibility. Although 3.5% is still a lot, I think if a substantial number of men came out against their country's gynocracy, it could spark a worldwide movement. But the movement cannot be soy shit like muh men’s rights, it must be brutal, like invading and destroying feminist orgs.

 

[Claudius the God]

That's why I said, "It'd have happened already."

Porn and videogames are sedating men, that's why it hasn't happend already.

The thing is, they cannot keep a lid on human nature forever.

if they can use force they would, it'd be brutal.

Good thing they can't.

Although 3.5% is still a lot

I don't think it's a lot in that we'll have to wait a long time for it. So many men are incels, even without calling themselves that. Many men actually agree with most of the points put forward by us, they're just afraid of the word "incel" because foyciety.

But the movement cannot be soy shit like muh men’s rights, it must be brutal, like invading and destroying feminist orgs.

This is a real possibility, especially if someone influential comes along who is sympathetic to our cause, like a state leader or billionaire.

 

[SmhChan]

So many men are incels, even without calling themselves that. Many men actually agree with most of the points put forward by us, they're just afraid of the word "incel" because foyciety.

For most normies, it takes one personal humiliation from foids to go apeshit on them. The rage is obviously there, just buried.

 

[Claudius the God]

The rage is obviously there, just buried.

Just waiting to come out.

 

[nihilum]

First, the ones behind feminism are not women but the cuck males.

The cuck males are the ones who give power to women

Exactly

 

[LOLI BREEDING]

Men are becoming more and more politically separated from women, now. They have only gotten more conservative, as opposed to women who have gotten more liberal. There are more conservative men than cucked men, now.

"conservative" men are probably the MOST cucked. we are a very small minority here, grey. we have no representation. most normies, sex having or not can NOT say no to a femroach. all this tradcuck cope led to is trump. and trump don't care

 

[Claudius the God]

"conservative" men are probably the MOST cucked.

How so?

we are a very small minority here, grey. we have no representation.

We're growing every day, whether people realize it or not.

And representation doesn't even necessarily have to happen for societal collapse to occur, because it's on its way there already, regardless of whether we have a man in the arena or not.

most normies, sex having or not

Are they really normies if they can't get sex?

can NOT say no to a femroach.

The issue with that is this: women are saying no for them. They're not even getting a chance with them.

Besides, as long as our numbers keep increasing, the normiebase will decrease in size, meaning we won't have to rely on them for any sociopolitical change.

all this tradcuck cope led to is trump. and trump don't care

Trump doesn't care, this is true.

I feel like Trump is really, REALLY good at gaining and rallying for power, but once he actually gets it, he doesn't know what the fuck to do.

If our solutions are going to come from any current political figure, it's not trump. It's not even nick fuentes.