Serious Water doesn't need a source, even my university knows this.

[DoomThreeKoala]

Sewers because, y'know, IT and all that shit.

Nah fuck it, they can screenshot this all they like. Not like they will address my points. Even if they do it'll be the typical ad hominem or they'll take a statement out of context. Shalom IT.

Some time back, I had to have a lecture at my university. It wasn't about a course, but rather a "meta" thing, where we were learning the importance of citing where you learn shit from. One thing we did at the beginning was discuss "Is the Earth round?" and if we need to source it. Of course we don't have to.

Water. Does. Not. Need. A. Source.

This logic also extends to the parts of the BP that are obvious. I don't link to hard, concrete data. I mostly use examples (personal, other brocels, case studies) and let them and Occam's Razor do the magic in the reader's head. You would actually be surprised how far that can take you towards the right answer.

By all means you can provide sources, but the truth is IT or whoever you're speaking to won't listen. Ryo knows this as much as I do: The middle of the bell curve is where you find the biggest idiots. He even made a thread about this:

Why I think the "midwit" meme has a lot of truth to it, and the pitfalls that midwits often fall for.

I'm sure most of you are "online" enough to be familiar with the "midwit" meme. IQ bell curve with brainlet wojak being on the left "(low IQ) side, soyjak in the middle, and on the right (high IQ) side is either big brain wojak or a pic of some philosopher. Brainlet wojak and philosopher.jpg...

incels.is

Tagging potentially interested users:

Spoiler

@GeckoBus @Misogynist Vegeta @AtrociousCitizen @Ryo_Hazuki

 

[endoftheskies]

Sewers because, y'know, IT and all that shit.

Nah fuck it, they can screenshot this all they like. Not like they will address my points. Even if they do it'll be the typical ad hominem or they'll take a statement out of context. Shalom IT.

Some time back, I had to have a lecture at my university. It wasn't about a course, but rather a "meta" thing, where we were learning the importance of citing where you learn shit from. One thing we did at the beginning was discuss "Is the Earth round?" and if we need to source it. Of course we don't have to.

Water. Does. Not. Need. A. Source.

This logic also extends to the parts of the BP that are obvious. I don't link to hard, concrete data. I mostly use examples (personal, other brocels, case studies) and let them and Occam's Razor do the magic in the reader's head. You would actually be surprised how far that can take you towards the right answer.

By all means you can provide sources, but the truth is IT or whoever you're speaking to won't listen. Ryo knows this as much as I do: The middle of the bell curve is where you find the biggest idiots. He even made a thread about this:

Why I think the "midwit" meme has a lot of truth to it, and the pitfalls that midwits often fall for.

I'm sure most of you are "online" enough to be familiar with the "midwit" meme. IQ bell curve with brainlet wojak being on the left "(low IQ) side, soyjak in the middle, and on the right (high IQ) side is either big brain wojak or a pic of some philosopher. Brainlet wojak and philosopher.jpg...

incels.is

Tagging potentially interested users:

Spoiler

@GeckoBus @Misogynist Vegeta @AtrociousCitizen @Ryo_Hazuki

just source everything and led to infinite descent theory.

 

[FBI]

Water. Does. Not. Need. A. Source.

Source?

 

[endoftheskies]

Source?

source?

 

[Ryo_Hazuki]

The midwit phenomenon in a nutshell:

Low IQ guy: Knows the obvious answer, doesn't fully understand why and can't quite articulate it.

Midwit guy: Ignores the obvious answer, asserts antithetical conclusion that ignores evidence and basic reason

High IQ guy: Knows the obvious answer, understands why and is able to articulate it.

By the way OP, you reminded me of a thread I had the idea of making but never got around to. A list of midwit theories/ideas/opinions. I know it will piss a lot of people off though....

 

[deleted fren]

"women are more attracted to violent men "
"Source!?"
Links source
"eRM..... That's pseudo science because erm.... The sample size is 100! 100 can't represent the population!"
There's no point in trying to reason with ITards or bluepillers in general. Studies should only really be cited on here to provide knowledge to brocels.

 

[Emba]

Wet

 

[DoomThreeKoala]

"women are more attracted to violent men "
"Source!?"
Links source
"eRM..... That's pseudo science because erm.... The sample size is 100! 100 can't represent the population!"
There's no point in trying to reason with ITards or bluepillers in general. Studies should only really be cited on here to provide knowledge to brocels.

If you think the sample size is too small, you shouldn't take any medicine, as it hasn't been tested on the entire population.

 

[DoomThreeKoala]

The midwit phenomenon in a nutshell:

Low IQ guy: Knows the obvious answer, doesn't fully understand why and can't quite articulate it.

Midwit guy: Ignores the obvious answer, asserts antithetical conclusion that ignores evidence and basic reason

High IQ guy: Knows the obvious answer, understands why and is able to articulate it.

By the way OP, you reminded me of a thread I had the idea of making but never got around to. A list of midwit theories/ideas/opinions. I know it will piss a lot of people off though....

You've hit the nail on the head.
I would absolutely read the list of midwit opinions.

 

[deleted fren]

If you think the sample size is too small, you shouldn't take any medicine, as it hasn't been tested on the entire population.

Exactly.