Aramaic-cel_SB
Nosecel and Framecel
-
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2018
- Posts
- 674
What do you think? No matter if you believe in Jesus or not. Just say if you think He was good looking or not.
I believe that if there was anything abnormal about his looks, be it that he was above or below average then it likely would have been picked up on and spoken about in the gospels. The fact he was a peasant born in Galilee during the first century means that they can produce what kind of phenotype he could have had as neighbouring populations were more similar looking before the various populations mixed together like they have today.Considering no one knows what he looked exactly, who knows.
He likely existed, but not in the way Christians understand him to have today and most of what is in the gospels is a totally made up fabrication.Jesus didnt exist tbh
I'm an atheist, and i hate every form of religiosity but there's solid proof Jesus existed. This doesn't mean he did miracles 'n' shit, he probably was a good person that dumb desperate people started to worship.Jesus didnt exist tbh
He existed almost certainly. But was unlikely as good a guy as he was painted as today. In the original Gospels, before they were translated out of ancient Hebrew reveal that he did not want to establish an all-encompassing Christian world religion, and really only saw himself as a messiah chiefly for the Jewish people. There is one passage where a Phoenician woman (non-Jewish) asked Jesus to heal her daughter and he replied “let the children of Israel be fed first, for it is wrong to take bread from the children and throw it to the dogs”.I'm an atheist, and i hate every form of religiosity but there's solid proof Jesus existed. This doesn't mean he did miracles 'n' shit, he probably was a good person that dumb desperate people started to worship.
This is what he likely looked something like. It is hilarious that the KKK view him as the messiah of the white race.
Jesus didnt exist tbh
He’s the son of God, if he wanted to he could be with any woman that God has created. Hypothetically speaking he healed and could turn water into wine. You think he couldn’t pull Stacie’s back and smash their uterus out? then your a fool. I wish I had super powers tbhNo. If he was GL then he wouldn’t have bothered with religion or philosophy because he’d be too busy fucking pussy. Also he only attracted MALE followers (12 apostles), which is clear evidence he was ugly.
In the original Gospels, before they were translated out of ancient Hebrew reveal that he did not want to establish an all-encompassing Christian world religion, and really only saw himself as a messiah chiefly for the Jewish people. There is one passage where a Phoenician woman (non-Jewish) asked Jesus to heal her daughter and he replied “let the children of Israel be fed first, for it is wrong to take bread from the children and throw it to the dogs”.
Good. I have versed myself massively in the counter arguments to Christianity and believe I could take on pretty much any of them in debate on the matter. The more fellow atheists I can give rhetorical ammunition to the better I sleep at night tbh. It’s Mark: 27 verse 27 btw, some of them don’t believe you when you tell them what’s in their own book.Thanks for the quote, i will memorize it in order to use it in case i get in an argument with a christian.
I remembered my female teacher had two pictures of an actually chadded-up Jesus. One full-body and one just of his face.This. We know he was ugly. Even the Bible said he was ugly. Also he was middle eastern ie. brown.
The fact that white people found the idea of worshipping an ugly brown guy so repulsive they had to turn him into a white Chad should tell you something both about racism and lookism:
From:
To:
I am actually mad about this. Fuck white people. Religious people are supposed to be all about "tolerance", yet they can't even tolerate their own Messiah.
Art you see depicting Jesus do not show an accurate representation of what he actually looked like at all. The trope that Jesus was a brown haired white guy came from medieval European artists depicting him as such. He lived in the Levant during the first century and there were no native white people there.
No they were not. The image of Judas with red hair began in the Middle Ages (several hundred years after the death of Christ) and was propagated by artists depicting him in stain glass windows as such because people were much more superstitious back then and believed red-heads were untrustworthy. This was an easy way to make Judas recognisable in windows and murals. Muhammad is described only as having “an orange tinted beard” and as the tribal custom of adding orange henna to one’s beard has been present in the Middle East since before the arrival of Islam and persists to this day, it is believed to be a reference to this. The only recognisably white people in the Judea around the time of Jesus would have been Pontius Pilot (the real person who ordered Jesus’ death) and the Roman soldiers. Jesus, his disciples and most other central figures all had a middle eastern appearance. The only reason you see many white looking Jews today is because these Jewish populations had migrated to Europe almost 1,800 years ago and have interbred with native Europeans and resemble them more than the original Aramaic Jews of Israel.They used to be white, in fact Judas and Muhammad were described as red-haired.
No they were not. The image of Judas with red hair began in the Middle Ages (several hundred years after the death of Christ) and was propagated by artists depicting him in stain glass windows as such because people were much more superstitious back then and believed red-heads were untrustworthy. This was an easy way to make Judas recognisable in windows and murals. Muhammad is described only as having “an orange tinted beard” and as the tribal custom of adding orange henna to one’s beard has been present in the Middle East since before the arrival of Islam and persists to this day, it is believed to be a reference to this. The only recognisably white people in the Judea around the time of Jesus would have been Pontius Pilot (the real person who ordered Jesus’ death) and the Roman soldiers. Jesus, his disciples and most other central figures all had a middle eastern appearance. The only reason you see many white looking Jews today is because these Jewish populations had migrated to Europe almost 1,800 years ago and have interbred with native Europeans and resemble them more than the original Aramaic Jews of Israel.
Yea, he probably looked like a mix beetween modern Egyptians and TurksArt you see depicting Jesus do not show an accurate representation of what he actually looked like at all. The trope that Jesus was a brown haired white guy came from medieval European artists depicting him as such. He lived in the Levant during the first century and there were no native white people there.
You believe he looked like this?Yea, he probably looked like a mix beetween modern Egyptians and Turks
Muhammad - couldn’t read and was too low IQ to learn. Even after becoming ruler of a state.
Nobody knows, but he was a carpenter who worked outside all day. Probably dark skin but ripped as hell.What do you think? No matter if you believe in Jesus or not. Just say if you think He was good looking or not.
Probably a similar skin tone, without retarded sideburns, and probably different facial features.You believe he looked like this?
This is a bullshit projecting made by a Jew to pretend he wasn't white. If you look into it hardcore where this came from it has no credible backing. Look up roman descriptions of Jesus. He was described with blue eyes, golden hair, slightly tan skin, caucasian male, his skin and hair were likely darkened from sun exposure which is to be expected.
Muhammad did not look like that. There was no depiction of him existed.