Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Was Jack The Ripper an incel?

Arabcel011

Arabcel011

Biggest subhuman on earth, freak of nature
★★★
Joined
Oct 30, 2021
Posts
730
800px JacktheRipper1888


All of his victims were women, none of the victims knew each other or had any relation to each other which means the murders were completely random and not related to tensions between certain families, all of his victims had their vaginas violently mutilated which suggests rage and hatred towards his victims (possibly rage towards women in general).

Edit: He didn't target prostitutes as many people believe, they were homeless foids and he killed them while they were sleeping.
 
Last edited:
crazy world we live in
 
nah he probably was a dark triad slayer who happened to enjoy killing and thought the easiest targets would be prostitutes. Samuel little did the same thing, just that he cucked himself and confessed to them.
He didn't target prostitutes as many people believe
oh really? Anyways homeless foids are still easy targets since most people won't care about them. Or at least won't in a sane society where pussy isn't worshipped
 
Last edited:
nah he probably was a dark triad slayer who happened to enjoy killing and thought the easiest targets would be prostitutes. Samuel little did the same thing, just that he cucked himself and confessed to them.
they weren't prostitutes, they were homeless and killed while they were sleeping. If he was just looking for easy targets then homeless males sleeping on the street, drunk males, disabled people, children, and old people are considered very easy targets too, yet he only chose to kill the women. Plus why would he mutilate the vaginas?
 
Last edited:
they weren't prostitutes, they were homeless and killed while they were sleeping
Yea I only read that part after I posted:feelskek:
they weren't prostitutes, they were homeless and killed while they were sleeping. If he was just looking for easy targets then old people and homeless males sleeping on the street should have been victims of his crimes too, yet he only chose to kill the women.
I mean its a possibility but there have been many killers that exclusively targeted women but where still getting pussy at the same time i.e ted Bundy.
Plus why would he mutilate the vaginas?
Maybe it was a form of torture? Maybe he wanted that to be his calling card? Could be a lot of reasons.
 
Yea I only read that part after I posted:feelskek:

I mean its a possibility but there have been many killers that exclusively targeted women but where still getting pussy at the same time i.e ted Bundy.
Ted bundy raped his victim, he had a sexual motive for targeting them. But Jack The Ripper didn't sexually assault any of his victims, he just murdered them and the nature of the stab wounds and mutilation suggests anger and rage.
 
Based rippercel, I propose we make him a saint
 
Ted bundy raped his victim, he had a sexual motive for targeting them. But Jack The Ripper didn't sexually assault any of his victims, he just murdered them and the nature of the stab wounds and mutilation suggests anger and rage.
Idk man, maybe he was one of the few incels in 1888 and had a deep hate for women. Maybe he was a dark triad that just wanted to kill for shits and giggles. Maybe It was a group of guys that targeted women. Could be anything tbh.

Who knows? Its not like we'll ever find out unless some long lost confession note is found.
 
Ted bundy raped his victim, he had a sexual motive for targeting them. But Jack The Ripper didn't sexually assault any of his victims, he just murdered them and the nature of the stab wounds and mutilation suggests anger and rage.
Didn’t Jack the rippER only target hookers?
 
Didn’t Jack the rippER only target hookers?
No it's not proven, the evidence suggest that they were homeless as all of them were victims sleeping on the streets. Only one of them was believed to be a sex worker.

9991998 6720065 image a 26 1550573395015
 
Most serial killers are dark triad chads that usually get enjoyment out of killing, so I doubt it.

Mutilating vagina still feels like some sort of sexual crime, otherwise he would have targeted other parts of the body, lots of serial killer have some sort of repressed sexual rage or something (Even the ones that were able to sleep with women, and even have kids).
 
Most serial killers are dark triad chads that usually get enjoyment out of killing, so I doubt it.

Mutilating vagina still feels like some sort of sexual crime, otherwise he would have targeted other parts of the body, lots of serial killer have some sort of repressed sexual rage or something (Even the ones that were able to sleep with women, and even have kids).
You see, dark triad chads have a pattern, and that is they always rape their victims and sometimes it's accompanied by torture/sadism too. That is the sexual repressed rage that they exhibit, it's how they show dominance. But jack the ripper is another case. He never raped his victims nor did he torture them, the mutilation happened after they were killed so it cannot be classified as sexual torture since the victims have to be alive in order for it to be called torture.

Also I should've noted that other parts of the body were targeted too. They were stabbed more than 25 times in many parts like the chest, neck, and abdomen. And the abdomen was also mutilated alongside the vagina and the insides of the abdomen/belly were pulled out.
Here's what it looked like.

Images
 
Last edited:
thank you, took me half an hour to find this gif and edit it, but worth every second and im very proud of myself.
:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
View attachment 526980

All of his victims were women, none of the victims knew each other or had any relation to each other which means the murders were completely random and not related to tensions between certain families, all of his victims had their vaginas violently mutilated which suggests rage and hatred towards his victims (possibly rage towards women in general).

Edit: He didn't target prostitutes as many people believe, they were homeless foids and he killed them while they were sleeping.
Proof Inceldom was a problem even before the Internet.
 
:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:

Proof Inceldom was a problem even before the Internet.
Yes women were always hated in almost every culture and every time period in history. They were hated in Ancient greece, the islamic world, the christian world, etc
It's funny how the SJWs and feminists try to paint it as a "new phenomenon" to make us look bad and delusional. Hatred of foids is very old and ancient, it just evolved now from proto-inceldom to modern inceldom.


Confucius: "One hundred women are not worth a single testicle"

Gautama Buddha: "Women, with their two-fingered wisdom, have a difficult time understanding what I teach"
Gautama Buddha: "If it were not for women being admitted into our order, my teachings would have lasted 1000 years, now they will not last 500."

"In Greek mythology according to Hesiod, the human race had already experienced a peaceful, autonomous existence as a companion to the gods before the creation of women. When Prometheus decides to steal the secret of fire from the gods, Zeus becomes infuriated and decides to punish humankind with an "evil thing for their delight". This "evil thing" is Pandora, the first woman, who carried a jar (usually described—incorrectly—as a box) which she was told to never open. Epimetheus (the brother of Prometheus) is overwhelmed by her beauty, disregards Prometheus' warnings about her, and marries her. Pandora cannot resist peeking into the jar, and by opening it she unleashes into the world all evil; labour, sickness, old age, and death."

Aristotle:
Aristotle says that the courage of a man lies in commanding, a woman's lies in obeying; that 'matter yearns for form, as the female for the male and the ugly for the beautiful'; that women have fewer teeth than men; that a female is an incomplete male or 'as it were, a deformity': which contributes only matter and not form to the generation of offspring; that in general 'a woman is perhaps an inferior being'; that female characters in a tragedy will be inappropriate if they are too brave or too clever.

Socrates: In the Apology, Socrates calls those who plead for their lives in court "no better than women" (35b)... The Timaeus warns men that if they live immorally they will be reincarnated as women (42b-c; cf. 75d-e). The Republic contains a number of comments in the same spirit (387e, 395d-e, 398e, 431b-c, 469d), evidence of nothing so much as of contempt toward women. Even Socrates' words for his bold new proposal about marriage... suggest that the women are to be "held in common" by men. He never says that the men might be held in common by the women... We also have to acknowledge Socrates' insistence that men surpass women at any task that both sexes attempt (455c, 456a), and his remark in Book 8 that one sign of democracy's moral failure is the sexual equality it promotes (563b).

Muhammed: Once Allah's Apostle went out to the Musalla (to offer the prayer) o `Id-al-Adha or Al-Fitr prayer. Then he passed by the women and said, "O women! Give alms, as I have seen that the majority of the dwellers of Hell-fire were you (women)." They asked, "Why is it so, O Allah's Apostle ?" He replied, "You curse frequently and are ungrateful to your husbands. I have not seen anyone more deficient in intelligence and religion than you. A cautious sensible man could be led astray by some of you." The women asked, "O Allah's Apostle! What is deficient in our intelligence and religion?" He said, "Is not the evidence of two women equal to the witness of only one man?" They replied in the affirmative. He said, "This is the deficiency in her intelligence. Isn't it true that a woman can neither pray nor fast during her menses?" The women replied in the affirmative. He said, "This is the deficiency in her religion."

Napoleon: Nature intended women to be our slaves. They are our property.

Hegel: They are not made for activities which demand a universal faculty such as the more advanced sciences, philosophy and certain forms of artistic production... Women regulate their actions not by the demands of universality, but by arbitrary inclinations and opinions.

Friedrich Nietzsche: When a woman has scholarly inclinations, there is usually something wrong with her sexual organs.
 
Last edited:
he cleaned the streets
 
Women regulate their actions not by the demands of universality, but by arbitrary inclinations and opinions.
Great one. Politics is mostly about revenge against men for women and their voting reflects that.
 
Who tf cares he did a good job anyways :feelsokman:
 
Most likely he was a sociopathic Chad.
 
View attachment 526980

All of his victims were women, none of the victims knew each other or had any relation to each other which means the murders were completely random and not related to tensions between certain families, all of his victims had their vaginas violently mutilated which suggests rage and hatred towards his victims (possibly rage towards women in general).

Edit: He didn't target prostitutes as many people believe, they were homeless foids and he killed them while they were sleeping.
 
Maybe he was an incel but not a truecel. Truecels are too high inhib for that.
 
He was based.

sex worker.
BTW thats a normie term, we don't refer to them as that here. Just call them what they are, whores, hookers, postitutes, skanks, sluts, foids, toilets etc.
 
BTW thats a normie term, we don't refer to them as that here. Just call them what they are, whores, hookers, postitutes, skanks, sluts, foids, toilets etc.
They should be referred to dirty used up sex machines as that's all that they are. I hate the term "sex worker", it implies their work is legit when obviously it's not at all.
 
I made a thread about jack the ripper before and just got 15 replies :reeeeee:
 
Who tf cares he did a good job anyways :feelsokman:
while yes he definitely did a good job, I think it matters if he is a fellow brocel or not,

He was based.


BTW thats a normie term, we don't refer to them as that here. Just call them what they are, whores, hookers, postitutes, skanks, sluts, foids, toilets etc.
I already said prostitutes and foids in my other replys, I was just being a bit formal when I typed that specific reply.
 
Last edited:
nah he probably was a dark triad slayer who happened to enjoy killing and thought the easiest targets would be prostitutes. Samuel little did the same thing, just that he cucked himself and confessed to them.

oh really? Anyways homeless foids are still easy targets since most people won't care about them. Or at least won't in a sane society where pussy isn't worshipped
bro can you change avi im horny af
 
His name wasn't Jack
 
It was too easy to be a serial killer back then before forensic evidence. There are probably hundreds of serial killers that were never caught simply because the bodies were never found and records were non existent.
 
He was probably a ted bundy type slayer
 
If I were ever crazy enough to go on a bloody rampage like that (which Im not dont worry guys) I wouldnt waste my life killing no homeless bitches ( probably sub 3 lets be honest here) Id go only after whores 8 and up, and Id make sweet passionate love to them while they were slowly bleeding out from their sliced open stomatch (in the movie Final Destination 2)
 

Similar threads

S
Replies
9
Views
475
Retardfuel
Retardfuel
Fat Chink
Replies
16
Views
670
sk.feelsdevil
sk.feelsdevil
C
Replies
8
Views
1K
Suigin Trismegistus
Suigin Trismegistus
ALifeWastedOnRot
Replies
55
Views
1K
ALifeWastedOnRot
ALifeWastedOnRot

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top