Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Was it based that earlier human societies killed their female babies

Question

  • Yes

    Votes: 2 25.0%
  • No

    Votes: 6 75.0%

  • Total voters
    8
CroatianManlet

CroatianManlet

Commander
Joined
May 13, 2022
Posts
3,017
Like 2000 years ago it was perfectly normal and legal for you to kill your female baby and population of countries was like 40% female 60% male.Do you think this was based or no?Because 2000 years ago foids had no rights so those dead kids could have been married off to some incel later on in their life.
 
Also India has a problem where their population is more males than females.
 
Last edited:
i dunno. women are the most valued and sought out resource
 
Unfortunately it’s men that need to be thinned out. Modern society is causing average men to become Neets and incels. Because women are now chad only. They don’t need a man’s money anymore they can go by someone’s looks.
 
No, having a gender ratio like that makes for a very unhealthy society with hyper-competitiveness among the men and more power and freedom in mating choice for femoids. If anything male infanticide is preferable. It spares would-be incels from a lifetime of pain, and makes the social relationships between men more amicable and less competitive as they can each more easily attain a mate.

This of course is a completely separate issue from subjugating foids socially, which is based and pragmatically useful for a functioning civilization.
 
no thats retarded, what wll the left over men fuck, they will be forced to move out to find holes.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top