It is very important to note something that I think is common enough to call it a rule.
Which is that men among men do show they have problems and when it comes adressing it, asking for help or simply venting. Face to face interaction is incomparable with doing it through a site like this, just writting it in threads and is more of a novice step in actually reaching out. Only after achieving leniency and after consecetutive engagement in this topic on the internet a man achieves mental capability to grasp or gain enough freedom to more bluntly get it out among his other male friends.
The problem appears with the type of dude who we all know, the stereotypical "get in grip" pal who either is genuine in this belief or thinks one thing but says another; even though sympathethic to having a chat there is a staunch conviction that bending the knee to such a scenario creates a negativ socialization moment for his friend so he pivots to the be a dude type of approach.
Yet the greatest obstacle, objective obstacle in this whole men's mental health argument is the natural disdain towards this behaviour that is seen from foids (unless you're chad, then the dynamic changes drastically).
It is undeniable, that if foids did not have this biological traits to disregard men who show mental weakness, this type of dude we all met at some point or saw would be as common as he is rn. More so, the musculine devotion towards being stout and cold and comically ruthless at points, with the whole cult of austerity would not exist in comparable scale as it is existing today.
It is important to note and show, to remind and popularize the fact that foids as much as they love to point out men's malice by counting endlessly the "disgusting" things we are attracted to or aroused by, and that it suppousedly is a foudation for misandry and justification for our discrimination, that foids react with ick to a man's mental problems is a sign about foids themselves and what it tell us about them and what sort of creatures they are.
Which is that men among men do show they have problems and when it comes adressing it, asking for help or simply venting. Face to face interaction is incomparable with doing it through a site like this, just writting it in threads and is more of a novice step in actually reaching out. Only after achieving leniency and after consecetutive engagement in this topic on the internet a man achieves mental capability to grasp or gain enough freedom to more bluntly get it out among his other male friends.
The problem appears with the type of dude who we all know, the stereotypical "get in grip" pal who either is genuine in this belief or thinks one thing but says another; even though sympathethic to having a chat there is a staunch conviction that bending the knee to such a scenario creates a negativ socialization moment for his friend so he pivots to the be a dude type of approach.
Yet the greatest obstacle, objective obstacle in this whole men's mental health argument is the natural disdain towards this behaviour that is seen from foids (unless you're chad, then the dynamic changes drastically).
It is undeniable, that if foids did not have this biological traits to disregard men who show mental weakness, this type of dude we all met at some point or saw would be as common as he is rn. More so, the musculine devotion towards being stout and cold and comically ruthless at points, with the whole cult of austerity would not exist in comparable scale as it is existing today.
It is important to note and show, to remind and popularize the fact that foids as much as they love to point out men's malice by counting endlessly the "disgusting" things we are attracted to or aroused by, and that it suppousedly is a foudation for misandry and justification for our discrimination, that foids react with ick to a man's mental problems is a sign about foids themselves and what it tell us about them and what sort of creatures they are.
