D
Deleted member 10124
Self-banned
-
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2018
- Posts
- 13,418
For one: Do you acknowledge that no woman wants to fuck you? Freely without any "virtue signalling"?
For two: What moral belief system do you follow which you believe gives you the entitlement & right to preside in judgement over others?
For three: Do you acknowledge that your personality has nothing to do with you getting laid?
For four: Do you acknowledge that everyone & I mean everyone has something called "freedom of speech"?
For five: What you call misogyny do you accept others can call it polemics against the matriarchy?
For six: What you call hate do you accept that others can call it hostilities?
For seven: Do you acknowledge that your belief system is casuistry & sophistry?
More to come. Now the articles.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/30/opinion/sunday/virtue-signaling.html (weak argument but acknowledges the vanity behind the virtue signalling)
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jan/20/virtue-signalling-putdown-passed-sell-by-date (in defence of virtue signalling - a pathetic attempt)
https://www.thesun.co.uk/living/2701968/virtue-signalling-meaning-origin-examples/ (definition only)
https://www.ft.com/content/cf4d3d5c-7129-11e9-bf5c-6eeb837566c5 (a critic lamenting the truth of being called out on narcissism, vanity & virtue signalling... cry me a river)
https://www.newstatesman.com/politi...rtue-signalling-are-trying-stigmatise-empathy (The problem with Virtue signallers is that they end up using "feigned empathy" to push through draconian & authoritarian attitudes & laws aka lawfare based on "muh fee fees" - This problem is prevalent on the Left BUT I have seen the Right try & use it to push through indefinite draconian laws much to my chagrin as a former RWA)
https://quillette.com/2019/09/02/vi...-civilization-would-be-impossible-without-it/ (the problem with Virtue Signallers is that they deliberately lack a sense of self awareness meaning that they're so full of their own shit that they deliberately fail to see other peoples points of view)
For two: What moral belief system do you follow which you believe gives you the entitlement & right to preside in judgement over others?
For three: Do you acknowledge that your personality has nothing to do with you getting laid?
For four: Do you acknowledge that everyone & I mean everyone has something called "freedom of speech"?
For five: What you call misogyny do you accept others can call it polemics against the matriarchy?
For six: What you call hate do you accept that others can call it hostilities?
For seven: Do you acknowledge that your belief system is casuistry & sophistry?
More to come. Now the articles.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/30/opinion/sunday/virtue-signaling.html (weak argument but acknowledges the vanity behind the virtue signalling)
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jan/20/virtue-signalling-putdown-passed-sell-by-date (in defence of virtue signalling - a pathetic attempt)
https://www.thesun.co.uk/living/2701968/virtue-signalling-meaning-origin-examples/ (definition only)
https://www.ft.com/content/cf4d3d5c-7129-11e9-bf5c-6eeb837566c5 (a critic lamenting the truth of being called out on narcissism, vanity & virtue signalling... cry me a river)
https://www.newstatesman.com/politi...rtue-signalling-are-trying-stigmatise-empathy (The problem with Virtue signallers is that they end up using "feigned empathy" to push through draconian & authoritarian attitudes & laws aka lawfare based on "muh fee fees" - This problem is prevalent on the Left BUT I have seen the Right try & use it to push through indefinite draconian laws much to my chagrin as a former RWA)
https://quillette.com/2019/09/02/vi...-civilization-would-be-impossible-without-it/ (the problem with Virtue Signallers is that they deliberately lack a sense of self awareness meaning that they're so full of their own shit that they deliberately fail to see other peoples points of view)