Based Very based Quote about foid "rights"

[Smitty]

An increase in the influence of women in public life has often been associated with national decline. The later Romans complained that, although Rome ruled the world, women ruled Rome. In the tenth century, a similar tendency was observable in the Arab Empire, the women demanding admission to the professions hitherto monopolised by men. 'What,' wrote the contemporary historian, Ibn Bessam, 'have the professions of clerk, tax-collector or preacher to do with women? These occupations have always been limited to men alone.' Many women practised law, while others obtained posts as university professors. There was an agitation for the appointment of female judges, which, however, does not appear to have succeeded.
Soon after this period, government and public order collapsed, and foreign invaders overran the country. The resulting increase in confusion and violence made it unsafe for women to move unescorted in the streets, with the result that this feminist movement collapsed.

- The Fate of Empires, by Sir John Glubb

 

[Deleted member 26032]

Women always fuck up whatever is good and virtuous.
The bible and ancient religions are simply metaphors to the nature that has been observed throughtout the history of humanity.

 

[Mainländer]

Gynocentric cucks are the ones enabling women in every case ever. They are even worse than the women themselves.

 

[Deleted member 26884]

Women always fuck up whatever is good and virtuous.
The bible and ancient religions are simply metaphors to the nature that has been observed throughtout the history of humanity.

Gynocentric cucks are the ones enabling women in every case ever. They are even worse than the women themselves.

Cucks are the bane of mankind.

 

[Deleted member 26180]

Gynocentric cucks are the ones enabling women in every case ever. They are even worse than the women themselves.

Men get desperate for pussy. That's just nature too.
I can see it now, it's a cycle.
Men control women, women cannot be choosy -> ,Men who are alone get horny and start giving more freedoms to women (read: not men but traitorous incels aka soys and cucks) -> Women lead society to decadence and weakness due to stifling -> Society slowly melts down and is reborn, and women give up power to men in exchange for men's natural strength and protection.
This cycle also perfectly lines up with good times create weak men, weak men create bad times, bad times create strong men, strong men create good times.
Don't ever expect anyone, especially non-based women or any soys, to agree with the idea that a patriarchical society is good times for women. When you value the immediate over the distant future, you can't understand why sacrifice now leads to preservation later, and indulgence now leads to destruction down the road.
This is also tied with religion, which similarly is supposed to promote later over now, but as it gets corrupted promotes now over later. Kill religion -> short-term thinking and morality. Revive religion -> long-term thinking and morality.

 

[Mainländer]

Men get desperate for pussy. That's just nature too.
I can see it now, it's a cycle.
Men control women, women cannot be choosy -> ,Men who are alone get horny and start giving more freedoms to women (read: not men but traitorous incels aka soys and cucks) -> Women lead society to decadence and weakness due to stifling -> Society slowly melts down and is reborn, and women give up power to men in exchange for men's natural strength and protection.
This cycle also perfectly lines up with good times create weak men, weak men create bad times, bad times create strong men, strong men create good times.

Exactly. Sad that some people can't see that when it's so obvious.

 

[Deleted member 22999]

Gynocentric cucks are the ones enabling women in every case ever. They are even worse than the women themselves.

They are the true architects of our suffering

 

[Deleted member 26180]

Exactly. Sad that some people can't see that when it's so obvious.

It's because even the most monogamous, small-world societies inevitably have incels, and incels can be divided into weak men and strong men like any other group, and the strong ones stay resolute like us (better incel than cuck, betabuxx = prostitution = cheating/not real love), while the weak ones succumb and restart the problems by overvaluing women and overstating their role, not realizing they are only giving their limited and under-proportional numbers more power. And so on.

If we want every man to have a woman, we need a ratio of roughly 1-10, and even then many men will get ignored. No amount of female thirst compares to instinctual disgust at low genes, and no amount of male thirst gets valued the same. It's such a paradox how women are more thirsty than men in general but are able to hold out so much longer most of the time, making men the thirsty ones in the end. I guess a gender known for being unpredictable is going to have paradoxes like that.

 

[Cruel]

Gynocentric cucks are the ones enabling women in every case ever. They are even worse than the women themselves.

 

[SupremeG]

Too long text. Women shouldn't have rights, period.