News Very attractive and very unattractive men show the highest hostility towards women

[Man]

Error - Cookies Turned Off

onlinelibrary.wiley.com

Key findings:

• Strongest predictor: Right-wing authoritarianism — massive positive link to both hostile sexism (β ≈ 0.61) and misogyny (β ≈ 0.56), explaining 29–35% unique variance.

• Attractiveness: Strong convex curvilinear relationship — highest hostility at extremes (very attractive and very unattractive self-ratings); lowest at average.

• Sexual partners: Moderate concave curvilinear — moderate numbers linked to slightly higher hostility.

• Other results: Rejection sensitivity weakly predicted misogyny; gaming addiction weakly predicted misogyny. No support for loneliness, romantic partners, or gaming hours as predictors in adjusted models.

• Models explained ~39–41% variance overall.

Conclusions: RWA and extreme self-perceived attractiveness are key drivers of hostility towards women even in general men, not just incels. Incel-specific factors like loneliness/rejection don’t generalize strongly.

Limitations: Cross-sectional (no causality), self-report bias, UK-only sample, no incel identifiers, potential unmeasured confounders.

Straight-up: The “very attractive and very unattractive men show highest hostility” headline comes from the attractiveness curvilinear effect. RWA dominates as the ideological driver.

 

[Man]

TL;DR — Title

We’ve been saying it for years

 

[Man]

This also mean the fakecels on here that come to rant about women are far more likely to be chads than butthurt average looking guys.

 

[NormieCelll]

That hostility mostly comes from them not considering us humans let alone giving us the time of day

 

[Alacros_vrail]

Error - Cookies Turned Off

onlinelibrary.wiley.com

Key findings:

• Strongest predictor: Right-wing authoritarianism — massive positive link to both hostile sexism (β ≈ 0.61) and misogyny (β ≈ 0.56), explaining 29–35% unique variance.

• Attractiveness: Strong convex curvilinear relationship — highest hostility at extremes (very attractive and very unattractive self-ratings); lowest at average.

• Sexual partners: Moderate concave curvilinear — moderate numbers linked to slightly higher hostility.

• Other results: Rejection sensitivity weakly predicted misogyny; gaming addiction weakly predicted misogyny. No support for loneliness, romantic partners, or gaming hours as predictors in adjusted models.

• Models explained ~39–41% variance overall.

Conclusions: RWA and extreme self-perceived attractiveness are key drivers of hostility towards women even in general men, not just incels. Incel-specific factors like loneliness/rejection don’t generalize strongly.

Limitations: Cross-sectional (no causality), self-report bias, UK-only sample, no incel identifiers, potential unmeasured confounders.

Straight-up: The “very attractive and very unattractive men show highest hostility” headline comes from the attractiveness curvilinear effect. RWA dominates as the ideological driver.

The opposite extremes on the bell curve

 

[Karlicel]

Error - Cookies Turned Off

onlinelibrary.wiley.com

Key findings:

• Strongest predictor: Right-wing authoritarianism — massive positive link to both hostile sexism (β ≈ 0.61) and misogyny (β ≈ 0.56), explaining 29–35% unique variance.

• Attractiveness: Strong convex curvilinear relationship — highest hostility at extremes (very attractive and very unattractive self-ratings); lowest at average.

• Sexual partners: Moderate concave curvilinear — moderate numbers linked to slightly higher hostility.

• Other results: Rejection sensitivity weakly predicted misogyny; gaming addiction weakly predicted misogyny. No support for loneliness, romantic partners, or gaming hours as predictors in adjusted models.

• Models explained ~39–41% variance overall.

Conclusions: RWA and extreme self-perceived attractiveness are key drivers of hostility towards women even in general men, not just incels. Incel-specific factors like loneliness/rejection don’t generalize strongly.

Limitations: Cross-sectional (no causality), self-report bias, UK-only sample, no incel identifiers, potential unmeasured confounders.

Straight-up: The “very attractive and very unattractive men show highest hostility” headline comes from the attractiveness curvilinear effect. RWA dominates as the ideological driver.

Water:
Only chads and incels expierence the true natrue of woman but on opposite ends.
Sure there are some bluepilled chads but after you relaise all foids are literal hoes especially non virgin hoes and what the chad can do to them he i accepts the degeneracy but also is disgusted by them.
The normie expierences neither. As the save oofy doofy he will have very limited sex and sex positions in a relationship, be on a constant leash and have no power and belives that the woman should have the say in a relationship and they dont like sex

 

[VanGobbel]

us and chad, we are basically the same AMIRITE

 

[Karlicel]

us and chad, we are basically the same AMIRITE

 

[sirlancelot]

Interesting study will read later

 

[Man]

Interesting study will read later

TL;DR
just the title
A couple other interesting snippets though

View attachment 1692439