PM_ME_STRIPPERS
IYAIYAI
★★★★★
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2017
- Posts
- 15,813
go.
If you voted anti - vax. why? would like to see peoples views on this
If you voted anti - vax. why? would like to see peoples views on this
Is it moral to let anti vaxer's kids into public schools? Ever since this movement started there has been an increase of death via diseases, some of which had been eradicated completely. These fucks don't just put their life on the line, they place everyone around them in danger. Fuck them and fuck this "they can do what they want" mentality. If they want to remain unvaccinated then they can go far away from everyone who knows the facts of medical science.I'm pro vax, but I'm against forcing people to get them as I find it to be unconstitutional and immoral.
People aren't entitled to be safe from others. I'd sooner support people's individual rights to be sickly and make others sick then to force them to do things unwillingly. BTW, be careful with that science god (coming from a guy with an engineering degree). Science is just the new religion of the masses, like the priests and the church of the old days.Is it moral to let anti vaxer's kids into public schools? Ever since this movement started there has been an increase of death via diseases, some of which had been eradicated completely. These fucks don't just put their life on the line, they place everyone around them in danger. Fuck them and fuck this "they can do what they want" mentality. If they want to remain unvaccinated then they can go far away from everyone who knows the facts of medical science.
No it's not the new religion. Religion is based on faith while science is based on experiment. Science does something that religion can never do: predict. With science you can predict at what temperature an element changes it's composition, how many Newtons a structure can hold, how much current an component can withhold, etc. What can religion predict? Now, whether people are entitled to be safe is out of the question, they aren't. We aren't entitled to living. Go out to the African Sahara and see if your entitlement to life matters to nature, it doesn't. The question of safety from others is a question answered by society. We, as a nation, decide what we should be safe from. The stupidity of others should not affect those around them! If it should then it would only be just as reasonable for me to defend myself; civilization would crumble under these conditions.People aren't entitled to be safe from others. I'd sooner support people's individual rights to be sickly and make others sick then to force them to do things unwillingly. BTW, be careful with that science god (coming from a guy with an engineering degree). Science is just the new religion of the masses, like the priests and the church of the old days.
There's some shit that you can't risk but most vaccines are fucked, especially here in Brazil.
Science disagrees with it self though. For example, there are two understandings of quantum mechanics (Schrodinger and Heisenburg models). I encourage science, as it can figure things out, but many things have been entirely wrong. In the 1960s, dinosaurs were reptile like, now, they have feathers. I'm sure it will be something new in the next 20 years. Science is also compromised by politics (global warming is essentially a fraud propagated by democrats for votes). Religion is a well, so I guess that's fine.No it's not the new religion. Religion is based on faith while science is based on experiment. Science does something that religion can never do: predict. With science you can predict at what temperature an element changes it's composition, how many Newtons a structure can hold, how much current an component can withhold, etc. What can religion predict? Now, whether people are entitled to be safe is out of the question, they aren't.
You are right in a certain sense that we are not entitled to life, but we are also not entitled to protect others lives. If someone believes that vaccines cause diseases, then they should have the freedom to avoid them. That's free will, which is the truest form or freedom achievable, which is part of the ideal society. If you want to get rid of anti-vaxxers and promote your idea, then promote education instead of forcing people.We aren't entitled to living. Go out to the African Sahara and see if your entitlement to life matters to nature, it doesn't. The question of safety from others is a question answered by society. We, as a nation, decide what we should be safe from. The stupidity of others should not affect those around them! If it should then it would only be just as reasonable for me to defend myself; civilization would crumble under these conditions.
I don't know the technicalities of it but basically a lot of substances that shouldn't be there were because of poor filtering, maintenance, etc.Yes, you can't risk disease from destroying civilization, see the black plague for reference. Could you list these irregularities?
KEK, that's wishful thinking, not prediction. There is no real god.Lastly, God (the real god, the Christian God) can predict. The entire Old Testament predicts the coming of Christ and then the Gospel happens. There is predicted a second coming and it will happen.
Science disagrees with it self though. For example, there are two understandings of quantum mechanics (Schrodinger and Heisenburg models). I encourage science, as it can figure things out, but many things have been entirely wrong. In the 1960s, dinosaurs were reptile like, now, they have feathers. I'm sure it will be something new in the next 20 years. Science is also compromised by politics (global warming is essentially a fraud propagated by democrats for votes). Religion is a well, so I guess that's fine.
Lastly, God (the real god, the Christian God) can predict. The entire Old Testament predicts the coming of Christ and then the Gospel happens. There is predicted a second coming and it will happen.
You are right in a certain sense that we are not entitled to life, but we are also not entitled to protect others lives. If someone believes that vaccines cause diseases, then they should have the freedom to avoid them. That's free will, which is the truest form or freedom achievable, which is part of the ideal society. If you want to get rid of anti-vaxxers and promote your idea, then promote education instead of forcing people.
kekanti-vax because it would reduce my lifespan.
I wonder if the rich and powerful have their kids and themselves vaccinated with the same vaccine that is supplied to the poor.go.
If you voted anti - vax. why? would like to see peoples views on this
I'm pro vax, but I'm against forcing people to get them as I find it to be unconstitutional and immoral.
yeA FAIR enoughAnti. No reason to believe medical jews have my best interests in mind.
> (((pro vax)))