Theory Unethical experiment?

[CEO of beta eyes]

I don’t know if this has ever been done before but they need to do an experiment where they get a bunch of newborn babies, all from different locations, put them in a completely isolated environment and just observe them.

Without teaching them anything, there won’t be any social rules and we’ll truly see the NATURE of humanity. Sometimes I can’t tell if certain traits are instinctual or taught.

Are women truly virtue signalers or were they taught to be this way? Are incels truly non-NT and naturally lack social skills or is it something they learned to become? This would truly show nature vs nurture.

This can also be played around with, we can add different social rules, different circumstances and see how the outcomes will be like. We can teach the women that they have to go hunt for food for the men and see if they’ll learn to stop being so damn egocentric and expecting to be treated like royalty.

This would totally debunk foid theories like “Omgg you only think you’re ugly because of society’s toxic beauty standards!!”

 

[THE TRUE DIGLET]

unethical experiment 2: do indian babies eat their own shit more than non indian babies?

 

[CEO of beta eyes]

unethical experiment 2: do indian babies eat their own shit more than non indian babies?

Curries being disgusting is entirely an environment thing. It has nothing to do with their genes

 

[downtoearth]

Every psychological trait is heritable. The environment nourishes our genes. And the environment can be a product of our genetic reality. One shapes the other in unexpected ways. Neurodivergence is mostly how your brain is wired. Studies of adoption and identical twins demonstrated that personality, temperament, and other characteristics that we relate to men and women are very heritable.

 

[CEO of beta eyes]

Every psychological trait is heritable. The environment nourishes our genes. And the environment can be a product of our genetic reality. One shapes the other in unexpected ways. Neurodivergence is mostly how your brain is wired. Studies of adoption and identical twins demonstrated that personality, temperament, and other characteristics that we relate to men and women are very heritable.

Then why are cultures so different from each other? Different traditions and values are taught so this must have an effect. Also back then they considered unibrows on women to be attractive jfl

 

[downtoearth]

Then why are cultures so different from each other?

Culture is a manifestation of a population's nature. It differs because people are not identical. But even in different cultures you can see a pattern. Women like stronger, taller, hotter, and richer men wherever you go. Men like younger and shorter women that are virgin. Nobody likes turncoats. Homosexuals are usually met with hostility. Everybody trusts people that are part of the in-group more. It's human nature.

Different traditions and values are taught so this must have an effect.

Of course. Environment is very important.

Also back then they considered unibrows on women to be attractive jfl

Yes. The standards change from time to time. But acne was never considered beautiful, nor were asymmetrical faces seen as the peak of beauty. Dry hair was never glorified. Bright eyes were always considered more appealing. Morbid obesity never had a space in beauty contests. You get the point.

 

[idiot_cel]

High iq idea

 

[CEO of beta eyes]

Culture is a manifestation of a population's nature. It differs because people are not identical. But even in different cultures you can see a pattern. Women like stronger, taller, hotter, and richer men wherever you go. Men like younger and shorter women that are virgin. Nobody likes turncoats. Homosexuals are usually met with hostility. Everybody trusts people that are part of the in-group more. It's human nature.


Of course. Environment is very important.


Yes. The standards change from time to time. But acne was never considered beautiful, nor were asymmetrical faces seen as the peak of beauty. Dry hair was never glorified. Bright eyes were always considered more appealing. Morbid obesity never had a space in beauty contests. You get the point.

Yea no shit, everybody knows obesity and acne are unattractive, this experiment is for things that are more subtle than that. Things that you can’t tell if they’re the result of instincts or if society reaches us to be that way

 

[juche necromancer]

There is no "true nature of humanity", human beings are largely the same genetically. What determined their culture and way of life was geographical determinism.

Now that the world is becoming one big village the human condition will largely monotonize

 

[downtoearth]

Yea no shit, everybody knows obesity and acne are unattractive, this experiment is for things that are more subtle than that. Things that you can’t tell if they’re the result of instincts or if society reaches us to be that way

I replied to your original post with the information that was available during my research.

We know that reading is not instinctual like speaking, which means our young must be taught how to read. Sociability is heavily influenced by the environment as well because some children that were forgotten by their parents in forests grew up with the animals and now behave much like them.

Speaking of animals, the closest ones to us are chimpanzees. They express jealously, envy, empathy, group preference, sociability, and even a desire for power. They demonstrate that much of our behavior is a product of DNA.

 

[CEO of beta eyes]

There is no "true nature of humanity", human beings are largely the same genetically. What determined their culture and way of life was genetic determinism.

Now that the world is becoming one big village the human condition will largely monotonize

We have a lot of similarities, that’s true. Which is why this study will focus on the DIFFERENCES, and understand whether they are the result of societal interference or actual genetic differences

 

[juche necromancer]

We have a lot of similarities, that’s true. Which is why this study will focus on the DIFFERENCES, and understand whether they are the result of societal interference or actual genetic differences

I wanted to type geographic not genetic determinism. Climate conditions are largely what determined the culture and success of each society.

 

[CEO of beta eyes]

I replied to your original post with the information that was available during my research.

We know that reading is not instinctual like speaking, which means our young must be taught how to read. Sociability is heavily influenced by the environment as well because some children that were forgotten by their parents in forests grew up with the animals and now behave much like them.

Speaking of animals, the closest ones to us are chimpanzees. They express jealously, envy, empathy, group preference, sociability, and even a desire for power. They demonstrate that much of our behavior is a product of DNA.

This test is supposed to about “instincts” battling with taught behaviors. We all know there’s an instinct for women to not hunt, so what would happen if we taught them to do that? Who would win, their instincts or what they were raised to do? That’s the more interesting question.

 

[CEO of beta eyes]

I wanted to type geographic not genetic determinism. Climate conditions are largely what determined the culture and success of each society.

There are different cultures within the same regions with same climates

 

[juche necromancer]

There are different cultures within the same regions with same climates

Do they have the same ancestry, were they influenced by the same more dominant cultures if they were influenced at all, how isolated are they from other cultures. Those all play a key role, but the beginning of a culture boils down to it's geographic and genetic predisposition.

The most relevant aspects for the success of society - it's economic and familial relations - boil down to those two factors.

 

[downtoearth]

This test is supposed to about “instincts” battling with taught behaviors. We all know there’s an instinct for women to not hunt, so what would happen if we taught them to do that? Who would win, their instincts or what they were raised to do? That’s the more interesting question.

Your experiment would be very helpful. This subject is a heavy interest of mine, hence my excitement towards it.

One study tested baby primates in a transparent box where they could look down and learn that they were very distant from the ground. All of them got scared and agitated, except baby sloths. These guys are naturally used to being meters away from the ground, so why would they be scared of falling?

Remember that they are our cousins. We share many instincts.

 

[CEO of beta eyes]

Your experiment would be very helpful. This subject is a heavy interest of mine, hence my excitement towards it.

One study tested baby primates in a transparent box where they could look down and learn that they were very distant from the ground. All of them got scared and agitated, except baby sloths. These guys are naturally used to being meters away from the ground, so why would they be scared of falling?

Remember that they are our cousins. We share many instincts.

Very interesting