Undead chronic replies to cucked argument whores and cucks often use about inceldom

[Robtical]

In this video he responds to these arguments you often see low t cucks and foids comment with against incels.

He brings this study up

View: https://youtu.be/LzBALylSVSw

 

[IncelWithHate]

I haven't watched the video yet, but the first obvious refutation to the 'naturalistic' rationale many people use to justify inceldom is contradicted by the fact many ugly, short and otherwise 'genetically inferior' women reproduce opposed to their male counterparts. These women obviously contribute to the perpetuation of low value stock (if not more so since women tend to reproduce at a higher rate than males for obvious reasons) but the IT crowd and foids are predictably silent on this point.

They can't justify eugenics while defending concepts like hypergamy or female oriented sexual selection because the notion of a woman wanting a 'superior man' to herself necessarily is disadvantageous to the mate and ultimately the Übermensch society they're advocating for. Of course, these people don't care; its all about gynocentrism to them but it's nauseating how inconsistent and contradictory their arguments are.

Another obvious fault is that human society in modern age is not 'natural' to begin with. The majority of people only survive due to heavy technological development and massive interdependency. This is even before we consider things like social media which has affected hypergamy and social interactions.

In the end, its simply making excuses for women having their cake, eating it too while somehow having the high moral ground to mock disenfranchised, incelibate men. Hell, even if their arguments held any merit than that still wouldn't justify their obsession with attacking unattractive males.

 

[Robtical]

I haven't watched the video yet, but the first obvious refutation to the 'naturalistic' rationale many people use to justify inceldom is contradicted by the fact many ugly, short and otherwise 'genetically inferior' women reproduce opposed to their male counterparts. These women obviously contribute to the perpetuation of low value stock (if not more so since women tend to reproduce at a higher rate than males for obvious reasons) but the IT crowd and foids are predictably silent on this point.

They can't justify eugenics while defending concepts like hypergamy or female oriented sexual selection because the notion of a woman wanting a 'superior man' to herself necessarily is disadvantageous to the mate and ultimately the Übermensch society they're advocating for. Of course, these people don't care; its all about gynocentrism to them but it's nauseating how inconsistent and contradictory their arguments are.

Another obvious fault is that human society in modern age is not 'natural' to begin with. The majority of people only survive due to heavy technological development and massive interdependency. This is even before we consider things like social media which has affected hypergamy and social interactions.

In the end, its simply making excuses for women having their cake, eating it too while somehow having the high moral ground to mock disenfranchised, incelibate men. Hell, even if they're arguments held any merit than that still wouldn't justify their obsession with attacking unattractive males.

One of the highest iq comments I seen on the site. He hasn't touched on hypergamous ugly foids ruining the genepool, thanks for bringing it up.

 

[TheDarkEnigma]

When IT realizes that we were right all along.

 

[the.oracle]

sounds like another tradcuck trying to discuss how "we" should engineer soyciety when the only say in this should be the men's

 

[Robtical]

When IT realizes that we were right all along.

If they have any dignity they'd rope after watching this.

sounds like another tradcuck trying to discuss how "we" should engineer soyciety when the only say in this should be the men's

The whore he's responding to is an old tradwhore with no kids.

 

[SteveyStevey]

I have a small amount of respect for these women who actually seem to be more conscious than the average female. However, they are both wrong. Female hypergamy =/= eugenics.
First of all, eugenics is when the most desirable women are matched with the most desirable men and everyone else is not allowed to reproduce. Eugenics would also involve removing female choice.
Just think about it:

short foids are always attracted to tall chads for whatever reason, but with eugenics, short women wouldn't even have the option to produce with tall chads.
I shouldn't have to even explain why female hypergamy =/= eugenics tbh.

See this pic? it's a fucking specie of wild pig that literally impales itself because roastie pigs like the way it looks.

Female hypergamy is just 5/10s thinking they deserve 8/10s with no constraints which has obviously been fucking disastrous for soysciety.

 

[Robtical]

I have a small amount of respect for these women who actually seem to be more conscious than the average female. However, they are both wrong. Female hypergamy =/= eugenics.
First of all, eugenics is when the most desirable women are matched with the most desirable men and everyone else is not allowed to reproduce. Eugenics would also involve removing female choice.
Just think about it:

short foids are always attracted to tall chads for whatever reason, but with eugenics, short women wouldn't even have the option to produce with tall chads.
I shouldn't have to even explain why female hypergamy =/= eugenics tbh.

See this pic? it's a fucking specie of wild pig that literally impales itself because roastie pigs like the way it looks.

Female hypergamy is just 5/10s thinking they deserve 8/10s with no constraints which has obviously been fucking disastrous for soysciety.

He talked about this in the video. Foid's sexual selection =/= best survival genes, like in the bird graph posted above the video.

 

[bigantennaemay1]

That's funny, because it's single mothers, and foids in general, that are an economic drain, so the uselessness she accuses us of is just projection.

Nice vid.

 

[Robtical]

That's funny, because it's single mothers, and foids in general, that are an economic drain, so the uselessness she accuses us of is just projection.

Nice vid.

High iq. The biggest leeches and dead weight of society talking about how we're useless.

 

[bigantennaemay1]

See this pic? it's a fucking specie of wild pig that literally impales itself because roastie pigs like the way it looks.

Pictures speak a thousand words. This is what happens to your species when you allow females to select their mates. Well, how 'bout that: females are awful at selecting mates.

 

[IncelWithHate]

Pictures speak a thousand words. This is what happens to your species when you allow females to select their mates. Well, how 'bout that: females are awful at selecting mates.

Ur example of female selection causing extinction.

 

[bigantennaemay1]

View attachment 596539

Ur example of female selection causing extinction.

What does that have to do with the boar I quoted?

 

[IncelWithHate]

What does that have to do with the boar I quoted?

I have to explain to you the relevance of male peacock plumage/ Irish Elk's extinction and how they relate to Fisherian runaway? Really?

 

[bigantennaemay1]

I have to explain to you the relevance of male peacock plumage/ Irish Elk's extinction and how they relate to Fisherian runaway? Really?

Yeah, man. I'm high af rn!

 

[Robtical]

Undead Chronic is becoming more BASED!

He has a good argument.... the Romans who practiced monogamy were more powerful than their Germanic tribal neighbors.

He's more high iq than I thought for knowing about that. I don't know if he's blackpilled or not, but it seems like it.

 

[BrettyBoy]

It pisses me off when women who aren’t on model level looks themselves refer to groups of men as subhumans, well, the femoid in the second screenshot didn’t exactly use that wording but she did still basically call groups of men subhumans yet the femoid looks like no damn model herself and only has it easy because of her gender yet has the nerve to behave like this.

The female ego is ragefuel.

 

[Robtical]

It pisses me off when women who aren’t on model level looks themselves refer to groups of men as subhumans, well, the femoid in the second screenshot didn’t exactly use that wording but she did still basically call groups of men subhumans yet the femoid looks like no damn model herself and only has it easy because of her gender yet has the nerve to behave like this.

The female ego is ragefuel.

I know, it would be a little less ragefuel if a gigastacy was saying this, not dirty old hoebags 50+ years past their expiration date talking down to all young and old non chad men. It's even impossible for those cunts to reproduce anymore, so their opinions belong immediately in the trash.

 

[JayGoptri]

Wisses me off when women who aren’t on model level looks themselves refer to groups of men as subhumans, well, the femoid in the second screenshot didn’t exactly use that wording but she did still basically call groups of men subhumans yet the femoid looks like no damn model herself and only has it easy because of her gender yet has the nerve to behave like this.

The female ego is ragefuel.

So what you are saying is that you prefer to be put down and insulted by only mega hotties, otherwise its not acceptable?

Basically - I know and understand this feeling. And it's a form of Stacy worship and wanting to be whipped by the gods one worships. It's bad to think this way. Very bad.

Yes it's annoying when ugly ass bitches behave like Stacy class pieces of ass, but it's equally as annoying when people like us express this sentiment because it's a way of pretending to be Chad in our heads. Ersatz Chad !

 

[JayGoptri]

So what you are saying is that you prefer to be put down and insulted by only mega hotties, otherwise its not acceptable?

Basically - I know and understand this feeling. And it's a form of Stacy worship and wanting to be whipped by the gods one worships. It's bad to think this way. Very bad.

Yes it's annoying when ugly ass bitches behave like Stacy class pieces of ass, but it's equally as annoying when people like us express this sentiment because it's a way of pretending to be Chad in our heads. Ersatz Chad !

And brownbilled.

No offense meant @-BrettyBoy- , just pointing it out like it is.

 

[BrettyBoy]

So what you are saying is that you prefer to be put down and insulted by only mega hotties, otherwise its not acceptable?

Basically - I know and understand this feeling. And it's a form of Stacy worship and wanting to be whipped by the gods one worships. It's bad to think this way. Very bad.

Yes it's annoying when ugly ass bitches behave like Stacy class pieces of ass, but it's equally as annoying when people like us express this sentiment because it's a way of pretending to be Chad in our heads. Ersatz Chad !

No but I just hate how through the roof the female ego is.

 

[JayGoptri]

I know, it would be a little less ragefuel if a gigastacy was saying this, not dirty old hoebags 50+ years past their expiration date talking down to all young and old non chad men. It's even impossible for those cunts to reproduce anymore, so their opinions belong immediately in the trash.

Hope you don't take this the wrong way but I gotta say the same thing I said to Brettyboy. Its bad for us to think this way. I used to do it also. See my post to him please.

 

[Robtical]

So what you are saying is that you prefer to be put down and insulted by only mega hotties, otherwise its not acceptable?

Basically - I know and understand this feeling. And it's a form of Stacy worship and wanting to be whipped by the gods one worships. It's bad to think this way. Very bad.

Yes it's annoying when ugly ass bitches behave like Stacy class pieces of ass, but it's equally as annoying when people like us express this sentiment because it's a way of pretending to be Chad in our heads. Ersatz Chad !

It's both ragefuel, but even more ragefuel when an expired ugly foid does it, because it really shows how retarded they are.

 

[BlackPilledOverdose]

I seriously fucking hate Tradcucks and Tradthots so fucking much. They are just as bad as leftists and feminists with their shaming tactics.

 

[BrettyBoy]

Hope you don't take this the wrong way but I gotta say the same thing I said to Brettyboy. Its bad for us to think this way. I used to do it also. See my post to him please.

The point is that women who are our looks matches have egos that are through the roof WHILE we don‘t even have any options.

 

[JayGoptri]

No but I just hate how through the roof the female ego is.

Yes but almost all female ego is "through the roof". The distinction you are making here is that it is more acceptable to take shit from uber sexy woman than from an average, fat or ugly woman. I know why this feels appealing. I'm a man after all, with all the same needs, and I felt this was for a long time. In fact, it's like training, we are so trained to feel this way that even after you realize what your doing and that it's in fact all the same, we'll do it anyway.

Yes fat bitch and ugly or average bitches acting above their aesthetic level is disgusting, but it's only disgusting BECAUSE we are worshipping the behavior of the Gigastacy/Stacy. Yes they might be better behaved than trash whores cause their positive reinforcement in life is a much higher level. But it's the same error for us to make.

 

[BrettyBoy]

Yes but almost all female ego is "through the roof". The distinction you are making here is that it is more acceptable to take shit from uber sexy woman than from an average, fat or ugly woman. I know why this feels appealing. I'm a man after all, with all the same needs, and I felt this was for a long time. In fact, it's like training, we are so trained to feel this way that even after you realize what your doing and that it's in fact all the same, we'll do it anyway.

Yes fat bitch and ugly or average bitches acting above their aesthetic level is disgusting, but it's only disgusting BECAUSE we are worshipping the behavior of the Gigastacy/Stacy. Yes they might be better behaved than trash whores cause their positive reinforcement in life is a much higher level. But it's the same error for us to make.

Both are obviously bad but it’s just a natural reaction for me to be especially annoyed when it’s a woman who is of my looks level or below my looks level acting that way due to the fact of knowing they live on easy mode while I suffer.

 

[JayGoptri]

The point is that women who are our looks matches have egos that are through the roof WHILE we don‘t even have any options.

Yes this is true. But that's probably also a result of hidden worshipping Chad/Stacy in almost every aspect our our culture. Naturally, they also think "we deserve BETTER"

Its just that we end up getting the short end of the stick because the rest of the population agrees with women who says "we are diamond worthy baby, we deserve better".

 

[BrettyBoy]

Yes this is true. But that's probably also a result of hidden worshipping Chad/Stacy in almost every aspect our our culture. Naturally, they also think "we deserve BETTER"

Its just that we end up getting the short end of the stick because the rest of the population agrees with women who says "we are diamond worthy baby, we deserve better".

I don’t worship any type of women.

 

[JayGoptri]

Both are obviously bad but it’s just a natural reaction for me to be especially annoyed when it’s a woman who is of my looks level or below my looks level acting that way due to the fact of knowing they live on easy mode while I suffer.

They live on medium-easy mode. We live on death mode. We are all annoyed by it, trust me. It's even worse when a stupid liberal curry-American foid does it pretending like she is a above average white foid, when in fact she is a below average foid in general.

 

[Massimo The Lonecel]

Undead Chronic Is A Fag Who Hates Virgins.

 

[JayGoptri]

They live on medium-easy mode. We live on death mode. We are all annoyed by it, trust me. It's even worse when a stupid liberal curry-American foid does it pretending like she is a above average white foid, when in fact she is a below average foid in general.

Food = foid. Damit.

 

[JayGoptri]

Undead Chronic is becoming more BASED!

Now I know who Undead Chronic is.

 

[Robtical]

Food = foid. Damit.

I didn't know you were intentionally spelling it wrong.

 

[JestER]

Yet another reason why foids shouldn't have rights, this should be stickied

 

[Robtical]

Yet another reason why foids shouldn't have rights, this should be stickied

Ok

 

[JayGoptri]

I haven't watched the video yet, but the first obvious refutation to the 'naturalistic' rationale many people use to justify inceldom is contradicted by the fact many ugly, short and otherwise 'genetically inferior' women reproduce opposed to their male counterparts. These women obviously contribute to the perpetuation of low value stock (if not more so since women tend to reproduce at a higher rate than males for obvious reasons) but the IT crowd and foids are predictably silent on this point.

They can't justify eugenics while defending concepts like hypergamy or female oriented sexual selection because the notion of a woman wanting a 'superior man' to herself necessarily is disadvantageous to the mate and ultimately the Übermensch society they're advocating for. Of course, these people don't care; its all about gynocentrism to them but it's nauseating how inconsistent and contradictory their arguments are.

Another obvious fault is that human society in modern age is not 'natural' to begin with. The majority of people only survive due to heavy technological development and massive interdependency. This is even before we consider things like social media which has affected hypergamy and social interactions.

In the end, its simply making excuses for women having their cake, eating it too while somehow having the high moral ground to mock disenfranchised, incelibate men. Hell, even if their arguments held any merit than that still wouldn't justify their obsession with attacking unattractive males.

Well said overall. There is definitely a double standard, but it's not going to be recognised as a double standard while soyciety is busy elevating "womanliness" to the status of God-like ability and devine rights. The Chads and Stacys can afford to live in this world by being inconsistent so long as they keep their gene pools pure in one way or the other (i.e. they generally tend to reproduce more of themselves as a rule and at worst case scenario a high tier normie pops out every now and then). Leftism is always surface level thinking which is protected by a sort of casual "rules from God" unspoken deep seated belief. None of the shit they say with their mouths has to actually work for them to keep believing it. So infact, the only real rule they have created is that; one is not allowed to attempt the debunking of our beliefs. (Despite the fact they don't know what they believe in the first place). This is how they are able to say and do things which are ultimately sabotage of concepts like hypergamy or female oriented sexual selection.

 

[JayGoptri]

I didn't know you were intentionally spelling it wrong.

You mean unintentionally? Of course man. When I'm typing on my mobile or tablet, it always changes foid into "food" after spacebar even if it's added to the dictionary.

 

[Robtical]

You mean unintentionally? Of course man. When I'm typing on my mobile or tablet, it always changes foid into "food" after spacebar even if it's added to the dictionary.

Phones are stupid if the don't understand you use "foid" a lot more than food by now.

 

[FlyFace]

They can't justify eugenics while defending concepts like hypergamy or female oriented sexual selection because the notion of a woman wanting a 'superior man' to herself necessarily is disadvantageous to the mate and ultimately the Übermensch society they're advocating for. Of course, these people don't care; its all about gynocentrism to them but it's nauseating how inconsistent and contradictory their arguments are.

All of society is built upon a pack of lies.. point the lies out and everyone shits their pants. It's literally as easy as just pointing slowly towards a problem and society will nearly rip your arm off.

 

[Robtical]

I appreciate your thread Rob, they are consistently high quality.

Thanks a lot bro. These days I've been coming up on things that I always wanted to be talked about more.

This foid's entire argument is just one big exposition on the natural fallacy. Just because something applies to nature does not mean it applies to us. Why would women's evolved sexual preferences, which developed in an environment where 80% of men slaughtered each other to secure exclusive reproductive access to women, have anything to do with the maintenance and development of modern civilization? We live in a completely different environment that demands totally different things than the one we evolved under. Being a big stupid ogre in no way helps us cure cancer, fight global warming, or improve global economic conditions for the world's poorest. We don't need ogres, we need people who can build bridges, program, or do any of the other innumerable tasks that are necessary to keep our civilization going.

An nba or NFL player would be working at mcdonalds or hard labor if foids didn't want them and they didn't have their sport to play and make millions. Foids do mental gymnastics and say "these chads are the men we need to preserve for the future, and you're selfish if you try to get in the way." When in reality they're the selfish ones and care more about what gets their pussy wet than men who will actually contribute hundreds of times more positively for the future.

Tbh, these types of arguments are what I like to call genetically driven smokescreen. Regardless of how the argument is framed, all foids reach the same conclusion no matter where they start. It doesn't matter if a woman is a communist, fascist, hippy, libtard, traditionalist, or conservative - all of them want to fuck Chad, and they will perform whatever mental gymnastics to justify that. They do not want to fuck YOU. So to me these kinds of self serving arguments can be rejected outright with no qualms. The intellectual framing is just meant to distract you from what is really happening.

Remember, we're the selfish ones for trying to get in the way of them being continually granted access to men who get them the most turned on, even though they've been doing this to us for the past 70 years with no care for the development of future generations.

 

[Deleted member 36576]

If we let women's pussies decide the gene pool we'd have an apocalipse.

 

[JayGoptri]

Phones are stupid if the don't understand you use "foid" a lot more than food by now.

Usually I'm on my desktop or laptop when writing on here. But yeah, the software is weak.

 

[JayGoptri]

I appreciate your thread Rob, they are consistently high quality.

This foid's entire argument is just one big exposition on the natural fallacy. Just because something applies to nature does not mean it applies to us. Why would women's evolved sexual preferences, which developed in an environment where 80% of men slaughtered each other to secure exclusive reproductive access to women, have anything to do with the maintenance and development of modern civilization? We live in a completely different environment that demands totally different things than the one we evolved under. Being a big stupid ogre in no way helps us cure cancer, fight global warming, or improve global economic conditions for the world's poorest. We don't need ogres, we need people who can build bridges, program, or do any of the other innumerable tasks that are necessary to keep our civilization going.

Tbh, these types of arguments are what I like to call genetically driven smokescreen. Regardless of how the argument is framed, all foids reach the same conclusion no matter where they start. It doesn't matter if a woman is a communist, fascist, hippy, libtard, traditionalist, or conservative - all of them want to fuck Chad, and they will perform whatever mental gymnastics to justify that. They do not want to fuck YOU. So to me these kinds of self serving arguments can be rejected outright with no qualms. The intellectual framing is just meant to distract you from what is really happening.

Speaking of "natural fallacy, you believe that "global warming" is actually something which warrents the type of classifications and attentions that it get?

 

[FinnCel]

Ugly women have ugly children.
The genepool is not getting any better

 

[Robtical]

Ugly women have ugly children.
The genepool is not getting any better

 

[JayGoptri]

@Komesarj89

Still waiting on your answer to my question. Global warming !

Speaking of "natural fallacy, you believe that "global warming" is actually something which warrents the type of classifications and attentions that it get?

 

[InMinecraft]

translation: I support hypergamy cause it benefits my ass

 

[Robtical]

translation: I support hypergamy cause it benefits my ass

And they tell us we're selfish for just wanting our looksmatches.

 

[InMinecraft]

And they tell us we're selfish for just wanting our looksmatches.

nope, we're fine with 4/10 + girls probably