PPEcel
cope and seethe
-
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2018
- Posts
- 29,096
This week, the Department of Justice announced:
While the DOJ determined that, given the time elasped, it could not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the femoid committed perjury, they noted:
Just #BelieveWomen! Who cares about due process and the presumption of innocence?
I mean, you would have to be delusional to think that there isn't a racial aspect to false allegations of sexual assault or to (nebulously vague) descriptions of "creepiness", but Reddioters have all but forsaken the idea that men deserve due process.
This case is also a reminder that foid privilege has always existed .
As some of our users pointed out earlier:
The Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Mississippi announced today that it has closed its investigation into a witness’s alleged recantation of her account of the events leading up to the murder of Emmett Till. The investigation was conducted in conjunction with the Mississippi District Attorney’s Office, Fourth District. Till’s murder is one of the most infamous acts of racial violence in our country’s history.
In the early morning hours of Aug. 28, Roy Bryant, his half-brother John William (J.W.) Milam, and at least one other person abducted Till from the home of his relatives. Three days later, a teenager fishing in the Tallahatchie River discovered Till’s brutally beaten body floating in the river. Till’s assailants had weighed him down with a 75-pound cotton gin fan, which they tied to his body with barbed wire.
State officials charged Roy Bryant and J.W. Milam with murder; they were tried the following month and acquitted by an all-white jury. During the trial, the woman at the store testified under oath, but not in front of the jury, that Till had propositioned her and physically touched her hand, arm and waist while they were both inside the store. Following their acquittals, both Roy Bryant and J.W. Milam confessed to kidnapping and murdering Till in an account published in Look magazine in January 1956.
While the DOJ determined that, given the time elasped, it could not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the femoid committed perjury, they noted:
There remains considerable doubt as to the credibility of her version of events, which is contradicted by others who were with Till at the time, including the account of a living witness.
Just #BelieveWomen! Who cares about due process and the presumption of innocence?
I mean, you would have to be delusional to think that there isn't a racial aspect to false allegations of sexual assault or to (nebulously vague) descriptions of "creepiness", but Reddioters have all but forsaken the idea that men deserve due process.
This case is also a reminder that foid privilege has always existed .
As some of our users pointed out earlier:
Emmett Till wants to remind you to believe all wahmen.
Emmett Till was an early victim of the #MeToo movement
Emmett Till was not lynched just because he "attacked a white," as the liberals always say. He was lynched because he (supposedly) "sexually harassed" a white WOMAN. If Emmett Till had punched a white man in the face, he would not have been lynched. It was the worship of WOMYNHOOD that led to Till's lynching.
Fuck all liberal SJW swine
Fuck their intersectionality
Fuck their false, one-dimensional, black-and-white view of the world