Normalfaggots, even if they understand this, will never willingly stomach this or change their behaviour because putdowns, one-upping, status maintanence and clamoring for the most "alpha" position when foids are around is the lifeblood of their social interaction, but when you think about it trying to flex on people for them being piece of shit retard losers worse off than you is actually pretty pointless. It's always flung at people with the assumption that a person sucking is their fault attached to it, even though the vast majority of people who are pathetic losers are like that because of a mix of their genetics and their upbringing by people they didn't choose in an environment there was no difficulty selection stream for.
The guy who's poor? He's an idiot too stupid to learn a semi-coveted skill required for the maintanence of the system, with low conscientiousness and no connections (be it in the form of palm greasing skills or silver spoons in his mouth). All of these are almost certainly the result of things outside of his control and largely the result of genes governing his behaviour and cognition. The guy who has no girlfriend? He is a fucking ugly manlet framelet rat-faced incel who gets looked at women like a cockroach regardless of whether he works on himself by showering and gymcelling or not, his only hope for ascending is if he pays for it. Is it supposed to be his fault his parents were short and ugly, and he was probably bottlefed too much, maybe even had shitty nutrition as a child if he lived in a third world country and became a 5'3 turbomanlet?
The guy who's fat and kinda slow, and who got made fun of and ostracised by everyone in high school because he was annoying and didn't seem to "get it"? He's not me (although I had a similar level of social status, to be fair), but this is a real guy I used to know who makes me think of all this. I'm certain that, even though he makes a decent amount of money as a mechanic now, he still gets constant "ribbing" from people who will never truly take him seriously and will never ascend in social or economic status beyond a certain point. And guess what? His single mother is even fatter and stupider than him, go figure.
To make things worse, bad genes of all kinds and even shitty environments tend to come in packages, vice versa with good genes and environments.
When 115IQ trust fund lawyer Chad or somebody who's 60% of the way to being trust fund Chad because he's some "self made" Chadlite tries to pettily flex on some bald ugly incel janitor who lives in a hovel with his nice car and his girlfriend, what is he really proving? Especially when he does this over the fucking internet which I see CONSTANTLY (you'd think anonymity would make people less inclined to do this if there wasn't some innate urge to do it). The assumption that failures in life are at fault for the vast majority of their failure and that they could have avoided it by simply trying harder is demonstrably incorrect - the only thing smug assholes prove when they neg people worse off than them is that they are of higher genetic quality and were handed more resources which they now have at their disposal, largely as a result of innate characteristics.
This is like when Hitler pointed to low IQ shitskin races like gypsies and said that clearly Germans, with their prevailing nordid or subnordid phenotype and history of excelling in things that weren't crime, poverty and having 10 kids with their cousins, were superior to the subhuman gypsies. He didn't think that Germans were morally superior to them because they were decent human beings and pulled themselves up by their bootstraps, but because by virtue of their genetics the Germans weren't disgusting brown nigger monkeys incapable of creating anything noteworthy whatsoever. The herrenrasse is of better stock than subhumans, and the civilisation it produces is the result of the quality of its stock - both bragging normalfaggots and National Socialist racial logic share the same sentiment. The difference is that the latter is honest and has the courage (and arguably mercy) to put bullets in the heads of those who just suck, whereas normalfaggots keep losers around to dunk on so they can look better in comparison. This is the most gay shit ever.
Because rich handsome Chad has a hot gf and a Ferrari, does that make him a "better person"? In terms of his "quality" as a human being and his ability to improve the stock of the next generation, yes, but when you describe negging other men over things they have little control over as it actually is, it becomes clear that it should actually be morally repugnant according to normalfag slave morality programming. According to the moral code which these clowns claim to uphold, everyone who does this should be considered a giant asshole on the level of those who bully special ed kids and burn victims for their shortcomings (you should have just jumped out of the way of the fire faster bro!).
And yet despite this normalfags have an insatiable hunger for spouting narcissistic, status-maintaining putdowns that they need to feed in any social space they enter, even autistic shithole lookism discord servers like biv's one (if you're a cuckcord user you probably know what I mean) where narcissistic Chadlites flex on genetic failures with things they put almost no effort into achieving. This is another thing that made me think about this topic, not because I was dunked on myself but because others were constantly, I just got bored and the narc jannies banned me for posting scat porn and dog sex vids.
Obviously it's human nature, but the moralising we do to justify it is so fucking retarded. I can already sense that if this gets put on Inceltears (which it might be but I doubt they'll touch it right away if at all) or some other just worldist lysenkoist platform people will instantly go "nooooooooo you can't say that you're just minimising your own failures and the failures of others that come about as a lack of effort and pulling yourselves up by your bootstraps".
Most people never reach their full genetic potential, that can be conceded, but how could they? Maybe if I personally had the motivation I could be ripped and bump myself up half a looks point, read a bunch of books and become a sort of low-tier polymath with some inevitable usefulness, then still not be respected and be a complete loser because I am an aspie manlet, but that would require me being on fucking speed all the time and I'd die at 40 of heart failure. Even if I maxxed out my potential I still could never be Bill Gates or some shit without a ton of luck and factors outside of my control working in my favour. I just want to fucking lie down and rot for a reason. What was put into me, what was done to me and what happened to me that I had no control over, even beyond my genetics, is who I am now.
If I go and put myself out there my success in a society (because we live in one of those with lots of people who dictate whether an individual is high status or not, otherwise you are a hermit like Kaczynski whose main status to be looked at is the status of your physical health, whether you've broken your leg and are starving or whether you're in good shape and eating well) is decided by people whose actions, environment and innate characteristics I also have no control over. I am sure I just rot in my room because I am lazy and it's my fault, sure, I should go outside and "make the most" of my life now that I am a young adult and so much is now set in stone already, dumb shit bluepillers. I'd tell you to kill yourselves, but only a select few people have the special kind of bravery required to do that pretty much entirely as a result of things out of their conscious control.
Away from the tangent to finish with some venting that might resonate with some of you - watching this gay negging happen to other subhumans who try to put themselves out there in any setting and just get shat on so someone else can use them as a social footstool leaves a bad taste in my mouth and I don't enjoy it, I don't feel the urge to dominate those lower than me really. Especially when people (Knajjd is a good example lol) who already have a chip on their shoulder and something to prove do it, I just think it's gay. I think it's my Asperger's but I don't really care if I am "above" someone, people's attributes will speak for themselves and they don't need to be flossed on in a puerile manner beyond that (in an ideal situation). If I was a 150IQ Chad slayer or an almost friendless, completely gfless, quasi-NEET loser like I am now it wouldn't affect how other people should be treated by me, unless of course I wanted to signal my higher value to those around me by shitting on them like normalfags do constantly when they engage in this behaviour. I think people like soys who are of the same stock as us should be bullied for their insufferable behaviour until they become slightly more self-aware like us, but beyond that it's just kind of tiring and I find it hard to like or respect anyone who does it.
The guy who's poor? He's an idiot too stupid to learn a semi-coveted skill required for the maintanence of the system, with low conscientiousness and no connections (be it in the form of palm greasing skills or silver spoons in his mouth). All of these are almost certainly the result of things outside of his control and largely the result of genes governing his behaviour and cognition. The guy who has no girlfriend? He is a fucking ugly manlet framelet rat-faced incel who gets looked at women like a cockroach regardless of whether he works on himself by showering and gymcelling or not, his only hope for ascending is if he pays for it. Is it supposed to be his fault his parents were short and ugly, and he was probably bottlefed too much, maybe even had shitty nutrition as a child if he lived in a third world country and became a 5'3 turbomanlet?
The guy who's fat and kinda slow, and who got made fun of and ostracised by everyone in high school because he was annoying and didn't seem to "get it"? He's not me (although I had a similar level of social status, to be fair), but this is a real guy I used to know who makes me think of all this. I'm certain that, even though he makes a decent amount of money as a mechanic now, he still gets constant "ribbing" from people who will never truly take him seriously and will never ascend in social or economic status beyond a certain point. And guess what? His single mother is even fatter and stupider than him, go figure.
To make things worse, bad genes of all kinds and even shitty environments tend to come in packages, vice versa with good genes and environments.
When 115IQ trust fund lawyer Chad or somebody who's 60% of the way to being trust fund Chad because he's some "self made" Chadlite tries to pettily flex on some bald ugly incel janitor who lives in a hovel with his nice car and his girlfriend, what is he really proving? Especially when he does this over the fucking internet which I see CONSTANTLY (you'd think anonymity would make people less inclined to do this if there wasn't some innate urge to do it). The assumption that failures in life are at fault for the vast majority of their failure and that they could have avoided it by simply trying harder is demonstrably incorrect - the only thing smug assholes prove when they neg people worse off than them is that they are of higher genetic quality and were handed more resources which they now have at their disposal, largely as a result of innate characteristics.
This is like when Hitler pointed to low IQ shitskin races like gypsies and said that clearly Germans, with their prevailing nordid or subnordid phenotype and history of excelling in things that weren't crime, poverty and having 10 kids with their cousins, were superior to the subhuman gypsies. He didn't think that Germans were morally superior to them because they were decent human beings and pulled themselves up by their bootstraps, but because by virtue of their genetics the Germans weren't disgusting brown nigger monkeys incapable of creating anything noteworthy whatsoever. The herrenrasse is of better stock than subhumans, and the civilisation it produces is the result of the quality of its stock - both bragging normalfaggots and National Socialist racial logic share the same sentiment. The difference is that the latter is honest and has the courage (and arguably mercy) to put bullets in the heads of those who just suck, whereas normalfaggots keep losers around to dunk on so they can look better in comparison. This is the most gay shit ever.
Because rich handsome Chad has a hot gf and a Ferrari, does that make him a "better person"? In terms of his "quality" as a human being and his ability to improve the stock of the next generation, yes, but when you describe negging other men over things they have little control over as it actually is, it becomes clear that it should actually be morally repugnant according to normalfag slave morality programming. According to the moral code which these clowns claim to uphold, everyone who does this should be considered a giant asshole on the level of those who bully special ed kids and burn victims for their shortcomings (you should have just jumped out of the way of the fire faster bro!).
And yet despite this normalfags have an insatiable hunger for spouting narcissistic, status-maintaining putdowns that they need to feed in any social space they enter, even autistic shithole lookism discord servers like biv's one (if you're a cuckcord user you probably know what I mean) where narcissistic Chadlites flex on genetic failures with things they put almost no effort into achieving. This is another thing that made me think about this topic, not because I was dunked on myself but because others were constantly, I just got bored and the narc jannies banned me for posting scat porn and dog sex vids.
Obviously it's human nature, but the moralising we do to justify it is so fucking retarded. I can already sense that if this gets put on Inceltears (which it might be but I doubt they'll touch it right away if at all) or some other just worldist lysenkoist platform people will instantly go "nooooooooo you can't say that you're just minimising your own failures and the failures of others that come about as a lack of effort and pulling yourselves up by your bootstraps".
Most people never reach their full genetic potential, that can be conceded, but how could they? Maybe if I personally had the motivation I could be ripped and bump myself up half a looks point, read a bunch of books and become a sort of low-tier polymath with some inevitable usefulness, then still not be respected and be a complete loser because I am an aspie manlet, but that would require me being on fucking speed all the time and I'd die at 40 of heart failure. Even if I maxxed out my potential I still could never be Bill Gates or some shit without a ton of luck and factors outside of my control working in my favour. I just want to fucking lie down and rot for a reason. What was put into me, what was done to me and what happened to me that I had no control over, even beyond my genetics, is who I am now.
If I go and put myself out there my success in a society (because we live in one of those with lots of people who dictate whether an individual is high status or not, otherwise you are a hermit like Kaczynski whose main status to be looked at is the status of your physical health, whether you've broken your leg and are starving or whether you're in good shape and eating well) is decided by people whose actions, environment and innate characteristics I also have no control over. I am sure I just rot in my room because I am lazy and it's my fault, sure, I should go outside and "make the most" of my life now that I am a young adult and so much is now set in stone already, dumb shit bluepillers. I'd tell you to kill yourselves, but only a select few people have the special kind of bravery required to do that pretty much entirely as a result of things out of their conscious control.
Away from the tangent to finish with some venting that might resonate with some of you - watching this gay negging happen to other subhumans who try to put themselves out there in any setting and just get shat on so someone else can use them as a social footstool leaves a bad taste in my mouth and I don't enjoy it, I don't feel the urge to dominate those lower than me really. Especially when people (Knajjd is a good example lol) who already have a chip on their shoulder and something to prove do it, I just think it's gay. I think it's my Asperger's but I don't really care if I am "above" someone, people's attributes will speak for themselves and they don't need to be flossed on in a puerile manner beyond that (in an ideal situation). If I was a 150IQ Chad slayer or an almost friendless, completely gfless, quasi-NEET loser like I am now it wouldn't affect how other people should be treated by me, unless of course I wanted to signal my higher value to those around me by shitting on them like normalfags do constantly when they engage in this behaviour. I think people like soys who are of the same stock as us should be bullied for their insufferable behaviour until they become slightly more self-aware like us, but beyond that it's just kind of tiring and I find it hard to like or respect anyone who does it.
the way u speak to a tramp? Ur tone will obviously be different.
