L
Lebensmüder
Soon to be deleted account
★★★
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2018
- Posts
- 5,202
Accelerationism (e.g. deliberately making the situation worse) will only do one thing: Make the situation worse/more unbearable. But this won't give anyone (especially not the average man) an impetus to strive towards social change - humanity is far too cucked/domesticated for it. Outlawing prostitution will only make it worse for us - because then we will never get any form of sexual release. But something like that would never push a normal man over the edge where he then would be in a state where he wants to force change. Crimes of certain individuals won't matter in the long-term context - apart from more restrictions being made for the freedom of speech (something that the ordinary person/the eternal soy will celebrate).
Accelerationism is a cope, the only thing effective would be longer scale social change. Therefore we would need metapolitics - something that is nearly impossible for us to achieve because most of the media/education system is in leftist-liberal hands, setting up own platforms with relevance is nearly impossible too due to the monopolies of Big Tech and its consequent attacks on anything remotely anti-feminist.
The only thing we can hope for is hopping on a more popular train and deliberately trying to direct it into a situation more suitable for us (for example by deliberately trying to turn normal right-wing policies - that are more aligned with us because most leftists hate men and worship women while right-wingers at least advocate for equal responsibilities or a traditional system of "simpdom" where the roll of a provider is more important than individual, sexual attraction that only benefits chads- more in the direction of mens' rights and anti-feminism). Infiltration of popular counter-movements and gradual mainstreaming of certain views as well as actively blocking even more detrimental changes (like outlawing prostitution, removing student loans or prohibiting hate speech) would guarantee us a remotely improved life quality and hurt our enemies (feminists, chads, etc.) - of course many will say that politics are a cope and they mostly are, but a remotely improved life quality for us and a remotely diminished life quality for the opposition is worth it.
A total reversal of the policies of the last years (and the associated social changes) is impossible, the Box Of Pandora has been opened and most men were turned irreversibly into simps, a movement towards a cope society/a marginally improved life quality for men is the only thing with a slight chance of success.
Some minor goals that could contribute to an increased life quality:
Blocking things that benefit our opposition like hate speech laws (we have no institutional power, therefore we cannot define what hate is and what isn't, therefore these laws have the potential to be used against us), public broadcasting (most journalists are leftists, you would cuck yourself by giving them your money to make propaganda against you, at least in the free market you can choose not to pay for them, but especially in Europe you are forced to do so) and universities (mostly women go there, when student loans are removed they will have the potential to become even more hypergamous, the last disadvantage of it would disappear, you would pay to improve the life quality of something that hates you, even more women could then acquire education and therefore become more hypergmaous due to more options, furthermore universities are in the hands of ideologically not with us aligned people and therefore reducing the amount of influence they have reduces the power of our enemy).
For whitecels especially: Blocking easier migration (less skewed up gender ratio and less people voting leftists and therefore less feminism, also good for ricecels so that whites have to remain where they are and cannot JBWmaxx anymore).
Now for things that we could support: Easier access to assisted suicide (for those who want to end it), less social freedom (social freedom is like all freedom associated with once consequence: darwinism, when everything is socially unlimited there is no need for even associating with below average or even average people, whoredom never helps you because it only helps chads, women have sex in the highest amount possible and sex was never more advocated for in movies/advertisement/etc., but ironically people have less sex than ever, social freedom benefits the A-class/implies survival of the most well adapted/fittest - in this case the most beautiful/NT, religion/nationalism/etc. all bring people together by giving them a common core again), easier access to prostitution (like in certain European countries where disabled/mentally ill/deformed people get whores for free), depending on whether you are a STEMcel/NEETcel more or less social welfare programmes, more mental health programmes (mental health is mostly a scam, but for some autistcels/other mentalcels it might help them to get over bullying in younger years and it might help them to acquire the necessary skills to pass as NT and therefore get regular accension or friends, so that people that were bullied and had their social capacities destroyed or just never had any might be able to acquire them instead of just being left to rot), etc.
Accelerationism is a cope, the only thing effective would be longer scale social change. Therefore we would need metapolitics - something that is nearly impossible for us to achieve because most of the media/education system is in leftist-liberal hands, setting up own platforms with relevance is nearly impossible too due to the monopolies of Big Tech and its consequent attacks on anything remotely anti-feminist.
The only thing we can hope for is hopping on a more popular train and deliberately trying to direct it into a situation more suitable for us (for example by deliberately trying to turn normal right-wing policies - that are more aligned with us because most leftists hate men and worship women while right-wingers at least advocate for equal responsibilities or a traditional system of "simpdom" where the roll of a provider is more important than individual, sexual attraction that only benefits chads- more in the direction of mens' rights and anti-feminism). Infiltration of popular counter-movements and gradual mainstreaming of certain views as well as actively blocking even more detrimental changes (like outlawing prostitution, removing student loans or prohibiting hate speech) would guarantee us a remotely improved life quality and hurt our enemies (feminists, chads, etc.) - of course many will say that politics are a cope and they mostly are, but a remotely improved life quality for us and a remotely diminished life quality for the opposition is worth it.
A total reversal of the policies of the last years (and the associated social changes) is impossible, the Box Of Pandora has been opened and most men were turned irreversibly into simps, a movement towards a cope society/a marginally improved life quality for men is the only thing with a slight chance of success.
Some minor goals that could contribute to an increased life quality:
Blocking things that benefit our opposition like hate speech laws (we have no institutional power, therefore we cannot define what hate is and what isn't, therefore these laws have the potential to be used against us), public broadcasting (most journalists are leftists, you would cuck yourself by giving them your money to make propaganda against you, at least in the free market you can choose not to pay for them, but especially in Europe you are forced to do so) and universities (mostly women go there, when student loans are removed they will have the potential to become even more hypergamous, the last disadvantage of it would disappear, you would pay to improve the life quality of something that hates you, even more women could then acquire education and therefore become more hypergmaous due to more options, furthermore universities are in the hands of ideologically not with us aligned people and therefore reducing the amount of influence they have reduces the power of our enemy).
For whitecels especially: Blocking easier migration (less skewed up gender ratio and less people voting leftists and therefore less feminism, also good for ricecels so that whites have to remain where they are and cannot JBWmaxx anymore).
Now for things that we could support: Easier access to assisted suicide (for those who want to end it), less social freedom (social freedom is like all freedom associated with once consequence: darwinism, when everything is socially unlimited there is no need for even associating with below average or even average people, whoredom never helps you because it only helps chads, women have sex in the highest amount possible and sex was never more advocated for in movies/advertisement/etc., but ironically people have less sex than ever, social freedom benefits the A-class/implies survival of the most well adapted/fittest - in this case the most beautiful/NT, religion/nationalism/etc. all bring people together by giving them a common core again), easier access to prostitution (like in certain European countries where disabled/mentally ill/deformed people get whores for free), depending on whether you are a STEMcel/NEETcel more or less social welfare programmes, more mental health programmes (mental health is mostly a scam, but for some autistcels/other mentalcels it might help them to get over bullying in younger years and it might help them to acquire the necessary skills to pass as NT and therefore get regular accension or friends, so that people that were bullied and had their social capacities destroyed or just never had any might be able to acquire them instead of just being left to rot), etc.
Last edited: