Foids should be eradicated via laser fire
some of the top 50 men look HTN (a few normie tier)
Bottom 50 just look average. People you would see at a gas station
Yes but they all have chad-tier frame in common, if you also look at AI sites most of the male characters have the exact same body type with broad shoulders and hilariously ripped physiques.
A naturally thin dude is never going to get any attention.
All the niggas on the left look the same. No diverse features or characteristics.
They all want one type of man and it's this. Boring white chad with big muscles
They all want one type of man and it's this. Boring white chad with big muscles
That's what I'm sayin
utterly vicious JBW
The difference is brutal
fucking foids
All these "worst" men mog me
Same
For real
Very strange that people would engage with the male-rating side of the site
Not a single black or ethnic on the left. JBW always wins.
The left is a bunch of attractive dudes with staged photos ( implying extreme vanity, normal men don't do this )
The right is a bunch of utilitarian selfies because no one cares about them and they aren't vain enough to have someone else take photos of them.
I'm noticing (that women are retards who fall for marketing just like in the economy )
The right is a bunch of utilitarian selfies because no one cares about them and they aren't vain enough to have someone else take photos of them.
I'm noticing (that women are retards who fall for marketing just like in the economy )
ropefuel for ethnics, there is not one non-white man on the attractive sideThe Teaspill website lets you rank men from most attractive to least attractive using a competitive ELO algorithm.
And these are the results.
Top 50 Men Photos:Young White Gigachads with perfect bodies, outdoor photos, smiles, doing things with dogs.
Bottom 50 Men Photos: Indoor photos, selfies, sad faces, balds, feminine poses doing nothing.
The ELO algorithm is the same one used in games like chess, Counter-Strike, and League of Legends to rank players fairly accurately in direct comparisons.
So, now we have a list of the 50 best and worst men uploaded to the app.
That reminds me of something. Someone on here made a good post about it. The actualy average is Chad. Any sort of deviation from it, is not a good thing. This is why variety is not a good thing. I always hear about evolutionary biology and variety and that is the reason for variety but that does not add up. You do not find any variety in regards to animals. For example, penis size. All male donkeys have a big penis. Yet for men, there is someone who has 4 inches and the other one has 8 inches, which is twice the size. This also goes for looks and height. The explanation for this is then always "variety" when in reality, variety is not a good thing and it is always being filtered out. Variety should not even exist in humans. The question is, how did it even come into existence? There is no explanation for this.
I think @Kamanbert made a post about the actual average in regards to @GeckoBus
It was a good post.
Bro, isn't this explained by evolution? The DNA randomly mutates or sum shit and if you get stuff that don't work then you reproduce less whilst chad DNA spreads more copies. IIRC males also tend to have more mutation or whatever and get more variation, basically gambling to a greater extent since you have greater chance to get beneficial traits and have a harem and to not breed at all.
It is not fully explained by evolution. Ultimately, It is just a claim. "Random mutations". Those are all claims. How does a "random mutation" occur in the first place? German scientists disproved that many years ago. Prof. Siegfred Scherer talked about that as well . There is a whole documentation about it. Random mutations do not survive. Variety does not survive. More variation is not good and does not survive. It also exist mainly in humans. Such as looks, height and penis size. I made the example of comparing male donkeys to men. Male donkeys have a big penis, a penis size that is universal. Why is it not the same for us? What is the mechanism behind of it? What is the mechanism behind a variation in the first place? Specially when most variations or even all of them are not traits that are preferred? It does not make any sense whatsoever. How and why does it came into existence? It is not explained. Nobody explained it. There is no explanation for it. Or perhaps I am just too retarded. Perhaps there might be a missing link, that would explain it.
Have you studied evolution at all or just went straight to whatever conspiracy stuff?
Yes, I even pointed to Prof. Siegfred Scherer and the German documentation. It is also a somewhat old documentation. To be fair, it is a German documentation. Also, where is the "conspiracy" here?
That basically the entire biological scientific community can show evidence supporting evolution theory from different fields of science and shiet? People seeing it in the labs and shit. People breeding foxes or something and getting different traits, people domesticating crops so they become wheat or sum. I wish you could talk to an actual educated person instead of me, since I've been brainrotting from no pussy, but they can explain and actually answer yo questions bro. If this theory actually baseless all deez labcoat Nobel prize redditors are lying or ain't do real experiments and shiet, if I understand things correctly.
Probably the same post I thaught about, but I werent able to find it
The first thing is that there are many humans in the world.
The most attractive men aren't always available; what we're experiencing in modern times with dating apps is an anomaly in human history.
In addition, many marriages were forced or arranged.
Cults, diseases, and wars have deformed the pools of available men and women.
In addition, there are diseases like baldness that spread through women and later affect men.
In addition, many women prefer to play with the poor, handsome guy but end up going for the average guy who has resources.
In modern times, many relatively mediocre men have been able to establish relationships through moneymaxxing.
M
But it's dark triad and statusmaxxing. Nothing special.
No. I don't want to believe it. Maybe there's another explanation. He doesn't look like the kind of man who can collect hundreds of women. Even if he takes photos from different angles where his face isn't visible (i.e., the eye area), everyone will see his face on the first date. In fact, he has a link to his 50-dollar-per-month red pill course in his description. Maybe it's a fake (a scam) to sell the program more profitably and earn money?
Similar threads
Toxic Femininity
Girls Share How Differently They’re Treated With And Without Makeup
- InMemoriam
- Inceldom Discussion
INVERTER
Users who are viewing this thread
