Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Too tall is bad too

  • Thread starter CEO of beta eyes
  • Start date
CEO of beta eyes

CEO of beta eyes

Officer
★★★
Joined
Oct 23, 2022
Posts
706
We all know how important height is in the blackpill community, but it’s actually deeper than that. Not only do you have to be tall, you also need to have good proportions which means longer legs and shorter torso. If you’re 6’2 but your legs are short and your torso is long, your body won’t be attractive to foids. Also, being a lanklet is bad too. You need to be tall + have a big masculine frame + long legs.

Another reason why I believe being in the 6’0-6’3 is always best because most men in that range tent to have a bigger frame and compact mid faces. Anything taller than 6’4, the chances of you having a small lanky frame and long face are higher
 

Attachments

  • C2C5D226-FD60-4C77-8265-CF6DC27C91C8.jpeg
    C2C5D226-FD60-4C77-8265-CF6DC27C91C8.jpeg
    110.7 KB · Views: 95
You get diminishing and eventually negative (compared to the ideal height) returns at above ~6'5, you can still have fine proportions most of the time under that. Still always better than being a manlet, though. :feelsohgod:
 
You get diminishing and eventually negative (compared to the ideal height) returns at above ~6'5, you can still have fine proportions most of the time under that. Still always better than being a manlet, though. :feelsohgod:
I’d rather be 5’9 with a masculine frame than be a 6’4 lanklet, but I know many will disagree
 
No such thing as too tall. Tall foids will gladly fight each other to the death for you.
 
We all know how important height is in the blackpill community, but it’s actually deeper than that. Not only do you have to be tall, you also need to have good proportions which means longer legs and shorter torso. If you’re 6’2 but your legs are short and your torso is long, your body won’t be attractive to foids. Also, being a lanklet is bad too. You need to be tall + have a big masculine frame + long legs.

Another reason why I believe being in the 6’0-6’3 is always best because most men in that range tent to have a bigger frame and compact mid faces. Anything taller than 6’4, the chances of you having a small lanky frame and long face are higher
nigga you can scam your frame with baggy clothes and tall zoomers and gen alpha have good proportions and no horsefaces they mog this forum till the end of the universe
 
even if lanky , you will always find a petite worshiping whore that will kiss the ground under your feet
 
Better than being 5‘6 tbh. 6/6‘1-6‘2 is the ideal male height. 6‘3 is good too but i feel like 6‘4 and above is too tall.
 
I'd rather be too tall than too short any day of the week
 
You get diminishing and eventually negative (compared to the ideal height) returns at above ~6'5, you can still have fine proportions most of the time under that. Still always better than being a manlet, though. :feelsohgod:
Ideal height is 190-193 cm, you are considered tall by men and women in place on Earth
 
Freakishly Tall > anything below 5'10
 
No one cares about too tall
 
We all know how important height is in the blackpill community, but it’s actually deeper than that. Not only do you have to be tall, you also need to have good proportions which means longer legs and shorter torso. If you’re 6’2 but your legs are short and your torso is long, your body won’t be attractive to foids. Also, being a lanklet is bad too. You need to be tall + have a big masculine frame + long legs.

Another reason why I believe being in the 6’0-6’3 is always best because most men in that range tent to have a bigger frame and compact mid faces. Anything taller than 6’4, the chances of you having a small lanky frame and long face are higher
You’ve got it backwards. A long, broad torso is dimorphic in men and seen as more attractive. Super long legs and a short torso looks feminine. That’s how most tall women look.

>t. Torsolet with long legs and arms despite being manlet
 
Blackpill is realizing the dude on the left actually mogs the dude on the right in the eyes of women.

He’s effortlessly much taller. Anyone can gymcel, but the dude of the right will never be taller.
 
You’ve got it backwards. A long, broad torso is dimorphic in men and seen as more attractive. Super long legs and a short torso looks feminine. That’s how most tall women look.

>t. Torsolet with long legs and arms despite being manlet
How are long legs feminine when men on average have longer legs than women?
 
There's no such thing as too rich or too tall. Womens hypergamy knows no bounds.
 
You get diminishing and eventually negative (compared to the ideal height) returns at above ~6'5, you can still have fine proportions most of the time under that. Still always better than being a manlet, though. :feelsohgod:
That's way too low. Plenty of basketball players top that and they're no worse for it. Shaq, Jordan, Charles Barkley are all above 6'5 and they're better off for it. Lebron is 6'9 and this is how beyonce looks at him.
 

Similar threads

edgelordcel
Replies
19
Views
267
ItsovERfucks
ItsovERfucks
Nordicel94
Replies
4
Views
130
K1ng N0th1ng
K1ng N0th1ng
Masquerade
Replies
25
Views
336
Friezacel
Friezacel
late20scel
Replies
7
Views
175
ItsovERfucks
ItsovERfucks
Q
Replies
47
Views
999
HeOweGoreWrath
HeOweGoreWrath

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top